It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Juhugeng Sag, located in northwest of the Muli Basin, Tibetan Plateau, has been investigated for coal and petroleum resources during the past several decades. There have been successful recoveries of gas hydrates during recent years from the Middle Jurassic Yaojie Formation that offer insight into the origin of the hydrocarbon gases from the complex sag feature. This study examines the organic geochemical and stable carbon isotopic characteristics of shale and coal samples from the Middle Jurassic Yaojie Formation of the Juhugeng Sag, as well as compares with carbon isotopes, gas amounts and components of hydrate-bound gas. A total of 19 samples from surface mining, including 12 samples of black shale and 7 samples of coal, were analysed using a micro-photometer, a gas chromatograph, Rock–Eval and isotope methods. All the shale samples contained 100% type I kerogen, and the random vitrinite reflectance values vary from 0.65% to 1.32% and achieve thermal pyrolysis phase. Isotope values of methane (δ13C ranging from − 52.6‰ to − 39.5‰ and δD ranging from − 285‰ to − 227‰) in the hydrate bound gases suggest that the methane originates mainly from thermogenic contributions. It is proposed that ethane from the gas hydrate is thermogenic-produced, and this conjecture is supported by the fact that most of the gas hydrate also contains more than 30% of thermogenic C2+ hydrocarbons and is similar to structure II hydrate. Carbon isotope data from the gas hydrates show a positive carbon isotope series (δ13C1 < δ13C2 < δ13C3), with ethane δ13C values being lighter than − 28.5‰, as high consistency with source rocks from the Jurassic period indicate thermal oil-prone gas. A model of the accumulation of gas hydrate is plotted. However, the gaseous sources of gas hydrates may be a subject for more research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 China University of Geosciences, School of Energy Resource, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.162107.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 409X); Qinghai Institute of Coal Geological Prospecting, Xining, China (GRID:grid.162107.3)
2 China National Administration of Coal Geology, Aerial Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Center, Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.467890.4)
3 Qinghai Institute of Coal Geological Prospecting, Xining, China (GRID:grid.467890.4)
4 China University of Geosciences, School of Energy Resource, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.162107.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 409X)
5 The Second Exploration Institute of Geology in Qinghai Province, Xining, China (GRID:grid.162107.3)
6 The Fourth Exploration Institute of Geology in Qinghai Province, Xining, China (GRID:grid.162107.3)