It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Sustainable inland waterways should meet the needs of navigation without compromising the health of riverine ecosystems. Here we propose a hierarchical model to describe sustainable development of the Golden Inland Waterways (GIWs) which are characterized by great bearing capacity and transport need. Based on datasets from 66 large rivers (basin area > 100,000 km2) worldwide, we identify 34 GIWs, mostly distributed in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America, typically following a three-stage development path from the initial, through to the developing and on to the developed stage. For most GIWs, the exploitation ratio, defined as the ratio of actual to idealized bearing capacity, should be less than 80% due to ecological considerations. Combined with the indices of regional development, GIWs exploitation, and riverine ecosystem, we reveal the global diversity and evolution of GIWs’ sustainability from 2015 to 2050, which highlights the importance of river-specific strategies for waterway exploitation worldwide.
The exploitation of rivers has been at the detriment of river ecosystems. Here the authors propose a concept of Golden Inland Waterways (GIWs) to represent large waterways and find that the exploitation ratio threshold around the turning point for most GIWs appear to be less than 80%, subject to ecological constraints.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Peking University, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Beijing, P. R. China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319); Peking University, Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advanced Technology, Beijing, P. R. China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
2 Peking University, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Beijing, P. R. China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
3 The University of Edinburgh, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
4 National Inland Waterway Regulation Engineering Technology Research Center, Wuhan, P. R. China (GRID:grid.11135.37)
5 Chongqing Jiaotong University, National Inland Waterway Regulation Engineering Technology Research Center, Chongqing, P. R. China (GRID:grid.440679.8)
6 Southern University of Science and Technology, Center for Global Large Rivers, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shenzhen, P. R. China (GRID:grid.263817.9)
7 Peking University, Department of Environmental Management, Beijing, P. R. China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)