It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Downsizing of animal communities due to defaunation is prevalent in many ecosystems. Yet, we know little about its consequences for ecosystem functions such as seed dispersal. Here, we use eight seed-dispersal networks sampled across the Andes and simulate how downsizing of avian frugivores impacts structural network robustness and seed dispersal. We use a trait-based modeling framework to quantify the consequences of downsizing—relative to random extinctions—for the number of interactions and secondary plant extinctions (as measures of structural robustness) and for long-distance seed dispersal (as a measure of ecosystem function). We find that downsizing leads to stronger functional than structural losses. For instance, 10% size-structured loss of bird species results in almost 40% decline of long-distance seed dispersal, but in less than 10% of structural loss. Our simulations reveal that measures of the structural robustness of ecological networks underestimate the consequences of animal extinction and downsizing for ecosystem functioning.
Species loss from ecological networks can impair network stability and ecosystem function. Here the authors simulate animal extinctions in interaction networks between plants and avian frugivores, showing that frugivore extinctions have comparatively weak effects on network structure, but strongly reduce seed-dispersal distance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany; University of Guelph, Department of Integrative Biology, Ontario, Canada (GRID:grid.34429.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8198); Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Biological Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721)
3 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Instituto de Ecología Regional, Tucumán, Argentina (GRID:grid.108162.c) (ISNI:0000000121496664)
4 University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262)
5 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7177.6)
6 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7177.6); Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Biological Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721)
7 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5)