It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Energy circulation in geospace lies at the heart of space weather research. In the inner magnetosphere, the steep plasmapause boundary separates the cold dense plasmasphere, which corotates with the planet, from the hot ring current/plasma sheet outside. Theoretical studies suggested that plasmapause surface waves related to the sharp inhomogeneity exist and act as a source of geomagnetic pulsations, but direct evidence of the waves and their role in magnetospheric dynamics have not yet been detected. Here, we show direct observations of a plasmapause surface wave and its impacts during a geomagnetic storm using multi-satellite and ground-based measurements. The wave oscillates the plasmapause in the afternoon-dusk sector, triggers sawtooth auroral displays, and drives outward-propagating ultra-low frequency waves. We also show that the surface-wave-driven sawtooth auroras occurred in more than 90% of geomagnetic storms during 2014–2018, indicating that they are a systematic and crucial process in driving space energy dissipation.
Theoretical studies suggested that plasmapause surface waves related to the sharp inhomogeneity exist and act as a source of geomagnetic pulsations. Here, the authors show direct observations of a plasmapause surface wave and its impacts during a geomagnetic storm using multi-satellite and ground-based observations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Key Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.458476.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0605 1722); Innovation Academy of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
2 Université de Liège, Laboratoire de Physique Atmosphérique et Planétaire, STAR Institute, Liège, Belgium (GRID:grid.4861.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0805 7253)
3 University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Department of Space and Climate Physics, Dorking, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
4 Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.418809.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9563 2481)
5 Peking University, Institute of Space Physics and Applied Technology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
6 Shandong University, School of Space Science and Physics, Weihai, China (GRID:grid.27255.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 1174)
7 University of California, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718)
8 Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Center for Space Weather, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.8658.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2234 550X)
9 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, USA (GRID:grid.474430.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0630 1170)