It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Habitat degradation and hunting have caused the widespread loss of larger vertebrate species (defaunation) from tropical biodiversity hotspots. However, these defaunation drivers impact vertebrate biodiversity in different ways and, therefore, require different conservation interventions. We conducted landscape-scale camera-trap surveys across six study sites in Southeast Asia to assess how moderate degradation and intensive, indiscriminate hunting differentially impact tropical terrestrial mammals and birds. We found that functional extinction rates were higher in hunted compared to degraded sites. Species found in both sites had lower occupancies in the hunted sites. Canopy closure was the main predictor of occurrence in the degraded sites, while village density primarily influenced occurrence in the hunted sites. Our findings suggest that intensive, indiscriminate hunting may be a more immediate threat than moderate habitat degradation for tropical faunal communities, and that conservation stakeholders should focus as much on overhunting as on habitat conservation to address the defaunation crisis.
Andrew Tilker, Jesse F. Abrams et al. assessed habitat degradation and hunting on tropical terrestrial mammals and birds in Southeast Asia. They find higher levels of functional extinction and consistently lower animal occupancy in hunted sites, suggesting that indiscriminate hunting is a more immediate threat for tropical animal communities.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.418779.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0708 0355); Global Wildlife Conservation, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.418779.4)
2 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.418779.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0708 0355)
3 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.418779.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0708 0355); World Wide Fund for Nature, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia (GRID:grid.418779.4)
4 University of California Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684)
5 Wildlife Alliance, Broadway, USA (GRID:grid.418779.4)
6 World Wide Fund for Nature, Hanoi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.418779.4)
7 World Wide Fund for Nature, Vientiane, Lao PDR (GRID:grid.418779.4)
8 Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, Malaysia (GRID:grid.452475.5)
9 University of Würzburg, Department of Remote Sensing, Würzburg, Germany (GRID:grid.8379.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 8658)