It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Image-based high-throughput screening strategies for quantifying morphological phenotypes have proven widely successful. Here we describe a combined experimental and multivariate image analysis approach for systematic large-scale phenotyping of morphological dynamics in bacteria. Using off-the-shelf components and software, we established a workflow for high-throughput time-resolved microscopy. We then screened the single‐gene deletion collection of Escherichia coli for antibiotic-induced morphological changes. Using single-cell quantitative descriptors and supervised classification methods, we measured how different cell morphologies developed over time for all strains in response to the β-lactam antibiotic cefsulodin. 191 strains exhibit significant variations under antibiotic treatment. Phenotypic clustering provided insights into processes that alter the antibiotic response. Mutants with stable bulges show delayed lysis, contributing to antibiotic tolerance. Lipopolysaccharides play a crucial role in bulge stability. This study demonstrates how multiparametric phenotyping by high-throughput time-resolved imaging and computer-aided cell classification can be used for comprehensively studying dynamic morphological transitions in bacteria.
In a high-throughput time-resolved microscopy screen, Taiyeb Zahir et al identify bacterial genes mediating morphological changes to antibiotics. An image analysis workflow enables the classification of single cells and deletion strains according to morphological changes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); VIB-KU Leuven Center of Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f)
2 KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Department of Chemistry, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
3 KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Department of Chemistry, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); Université de Lille, LASIR CNRS, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780)
4 Université de Lille, LASIR CNRS, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780)
5 KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884); VIB-KU Leuven Center of Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f); imec, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.15762.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2215 0390)