It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
All lunar swirls are known to be co-located with crustal magnetic anomalies (LMAs). Not all LMAs can be associated with albedo markings, making swirls, and their possible connection with the former, an intriguing puzzle yet to be solved. By coupling fully kinetic simulations with a Surface Vector Mapping model, we show that solar wind standoff, an ion–electron kinetic interaction mechanism that locally prevents weathering by solar wind ions, reproduces the shape of the Reiner Gamma albedo pattern. Our method reveals why not every magnetic anomaly forms a distinct albedo marking. A qualitative match between optical remote observations and in situ particle measurements of the back-scattered ions is simultaneously achieved, demonstrating the importance of a kinetic approach to describe the solar wind interaction with LMAs. The anti-correlation between the predicted amount of surface weathering and the surface reflectance is strongest when evaluating the proton energy flux.
Since the Renaissance, the Reiner Gamma formation was identified as a peculiar lunar feature. By combining magnetic field topology based on satellite observations with a full-kinetic plasma model, the authors successfully reproduced the shape of the surface albedo pattern beneath the magnetic anomaly.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Colorado Boulder, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564); NASA/SSERVI, Institute for Modeling Plasma, Atmospheres and Cosmic Dust, Moffett Field, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a); Université de Versailles à Saint Quentin, Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales, Guyancourt, France (GRID:grid.494619.7)
2 St. Petersburg State University, Physics Department, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897); Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.425140.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0706 1867)
3 University of Iowa, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa City, USA (GRID:grid.214572.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8294); Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden (GRID:grid.425140.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0706 1867)
4 St. Petersburg State University, Physics Department, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.15447.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2289 6897)
5 University of Colorado Boulder, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564); NASA/SSERVI, Institute for Modeling Plasma, Atmospheres and Cosmic Dust, Moffett Field, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a)