It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Accurate quantification of biodiversity is fundamental to understanding ecosystem function and for environmental assessment. Molecular methods using environmental DNA (eDNA) offer a non-invasive, rapid, and cost-effective alternative to traditional biodiversity assessments, which require high levels of expertise. While eDNA analyses are increasingly being utilized, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the dynamics of multispecies eDNA, especially in variable systems such as rivers. Here, we utilize four sets of upland stream mesocosms, across an acid–base gradient, to assess the temporal and environmental degradation of multispecies eDNA. Sampling included water column and biofilm sampling over time with eDNA quantified using qPCR. Our findings show that the persistence of lotic multispecies eDNA, sampled from water and biofilm, decays to non-detectable levels within 2 days and that acidic environments accelerate the degradation process. Collectively, the results provide the basis for a predictive framework for the relationship between lotic eDNA degradation dynamics in spatio-temporally dynamic river ecosystems.
Mathew Seymour et al. investigate the persistence of environmental DNA (eDNA) in river systems in environments of varying pH. Using four sets of upland stream mesocosms, they find that eDNA degrades to non-detectable levels within two days and this degradation is accelerated in acidic environments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Bangor University, Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
2 Water Research Institute and Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff, UK (GRID:grid.5600.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0807 5670)
3 NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.8682.4) (ISNI:0000000094781573)
4 Bangor University, School of Biological Sciences and Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
5 Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
6 University of Birmingham, School of Biosciences, Edgbaston, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
7 Bangor University, Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937); The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)
8 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK (GRID:grid.8682.4) (ISNI:0000000094781573)
9 University of California–Riverside, Department of Nematology, Riverside, USA (GRID:grid.266097.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 1582)