Fig 5a is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Fig 5. Combination of MEK and ERK inhibitors results in stronger suppression of KRAS mutant tumor growth due to improved suppression of MAPK output.
(a) Combination of cobimetinib and GDC-0994 demonstrates significantly greater anti-tumor activity in multiple KRAS mutant tumor models A549 and NCI-H2122 (cobimetinib at 5 mg/kg, PO, QD + GDC-0994 at 60 mg/kg, PO, QD) compared to single agent (upper panels). Mean tumor volume is plotted ± SEM (n = 10 mice per group). Study was terminated on day 20. All treatments were tolerated with minimal body weight loss (lower panels), One way ANOVA, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.005, ****p<0.001. (b) A549 (NSCLC, KRASG12S) tumor-bearing mice (n = 3 per time point) were treated with GDC-0994 (60 mg/kg, PO, QDx4), cobimetinib (GDC-0994; 5 mg/kg, PO, QDx4) or the combination and then MAPK target genes expression was assessed in tumor samples (Nanostring®) and the quantified results are plotted for each individual gene over time. The combination results in deeper, more prolonged suppression of multiple MAPK target genes, including DUSP4, DUSP6, SPRY2, SPRY4, ETV4, and ETV5. Student’s t test at the 24 hr time point, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.005, ****p<0.001. (c) The combination of cobimetinib and GDC-0994 results in stronger and more prolonged suppression of p-p90RSK/total p90RSK phosphorylation (as determined by quantitative western blot), cyclin D1 and Ki-67, as well as increased induction of cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) (as determined by IHC) in A549 xenograft tumors treated for 4 days (values were quantified from n = 4 mice/time point). Student’s t test at the 24 hr time point, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.005.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192059.g001
1. Merchant M, Moffat J, Schaefer G, Chan J, Wang X, Orr C, et al. (2017) Combined MEK and ERK inhibition overcomes therapy-mediated pathway reactivation in RAS mutant tumors. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0185862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185862 pmid:28982154
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018 Merchant et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.