It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the brain, the semantic system is thought to store concepts. However, little is known about how it connects different concepts and infers semantic relations. To address this question, we collected hours of functional magnetic resonance imaging data from human subjects listening to natural stories. We developed a predictive model of the voxel-wise response and further applied it to thousands of new words. Our results suggest that both semantic categories and relations are represented by spatially overlapping cortical patterns, instead of anatomically segregated regions. Semantic relations that reflect conceptual progression from concreteness to abstractness are represented by cortical patterns of activation in the default mode network and deactivation in the frontoparietal attention network. We conclude that the human brain uses distributed networks to encode not only concepts but also relationships between concepts. In particular, the default mode network plays a central role in semantic processing for abstraction of concepts.
Researchers leverage advances in machine learning to study the brain’s mechanism for natural language processing. Results suggest that the brain represents a continuous semantic space and uses distributed cortical networks for differential coding of semantic relations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
2 Indiana University–Purdue University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Indianapolis, USA (GRID:grid.257413.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 3919)
3 University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); Purdue University, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197); Purdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197)