It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Astrocytes support the energy demands of synaptic transmission and plasticity. Enduring changes in synaptic efficacy are highly sensitive to stress, yet whether changes to astrocyte bioenergetic control of synapses contributes to stress-impaired plasticity is unclear. Here we show in mice that stress constrains the shuttling of glucose and lactate through astrocyte networks, creating a barrier for neuronal access to an astrocytic energy reservoir in the hippocampus and neocortex, compromising long-term potentiation. Impairing astrocytic delivery of energy substrates by reducing astrocyte gap junction coupling with dominant negative connexin 43 or by disrupting lactate efflux was sufficient to mimic the effects of stress on long-term potentiation. Furthermore, direct restoration of the astrocyte lactate supply alone rescued stress-impaired synaptic plasticity, which was blocked by inhibiting neural lactate uptake. This gating of synaptic plasticity in stress by astrocytic metabolic networks indicates a broader role of astrocyte bioenergetics in determining how experience-dependent information is controlled.
Enduring changes in synaptic efficacy are highly sensitive to stress. Here, the authors show that astrocytic delivery of metabolites has an important role in the stress-mediated impairment of synaptic plasticity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Johnston, April D 2 ; Boyce Andrew K J 1 ; Diaz-Castro, Blanca 2 ; Institoris Adam 1 ; Peringod Govind 1 ; Zhang, Oliver 1 ; Stout, Randy F 3 ; Spray, David C 4 ; Thompson, Roger J 1 ; Khakh, Baljit S 2 ; Bains, Jaideep S 1
; Gordon, Grant R 1
1 University of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Calgary, Canada (GRID:grid.22072.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7697)
2 University of California Los Angeles, UCLA, Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718)
3 New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Old Westbury, USA (GRID:grid.260914.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 1832)
4 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Bronx, USA (GRID:grid.251993.5) (ISNI:0000000121791997)




