This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
The generating functions for polygonal figurative numbers (see [1–8]) as well as the generating functions for polyhedral figurative numbers (see [1, 9, 10]) have been the subject of research in the past period. Among polyhedral numbers, the authors of this paper find particularly interesting tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral figurative numbers. Their geometric representation is displayed by regular polyhedron: tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron (Figure 1).
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Back in the 3rd century BC, Euclid proved that there exist only 5 regular polyhedrons (see [11, 12]). This is the reason why the polyhedron numbers are so special and that is why they deserve a special place in the set of figurative numbers.
The fact that octahedral and icosahedral numbers and their models exist in many scientific areas also contributes to this research. Icosahedral-hexagonal grid is the basis of the global numerical weather prediction model (GME). This grid was first introduced in meteorological modeling in 1968 and it has been gaining interest among researchers in recent years (see [13]). Icosahedral structures are also present in metals, such as gold (see [14]), copper (see [15]), and metal glasses (see [16]). Octahedral forms are present in virus structures (see [17, 18]), as well as in the atomic nucleus (see [19, 20]).
The procedure for determining the generating function of tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral numbers is based on the differences between the members of the series of objective numbers. The differences between the two adjacent figurative numbers, as well as the differences between these differences, provide great opportunities for determining many equivalents in the field of figurative numbers. Applying these principles, we are able to determine the generating functions of mentioned numbers which is the main result of this paper.
2. Materials and Methods
It is known that (see [1, 21])
Tetrahedral numbers: 1, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, ….
Hexahedral numbers: 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, ….
Octahedral numbers: 1, 6, 19, 44, 85, 146, ….
Dodecahedral numbers: 1, 20, 84, 220, 455, 816, ….
Icosahedral numbers: 1, 12, 48, 124, 255, 456, ….
We denote by Δ1 the difference between two adjacent members in a series of figurative numbers, by Δ2 the difference between two adjacent differences Δ1, and by Δ3 the difference between adjacent differences Δ2.
Tetrahedral numbers: 1, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, …
Δ1: 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, …
Δ2: 3, 4, 5, 6, …
Δ3: 1, 1, 1, …
Hexahedral numbers: 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, …
Δ1: 7, 19, 37, 61, 91, …
Δ2: 12, 18, 24, 30, …
Δ3: 6, 6, 6, …
Octahedral numbers: 1, 6, 19, 44, 85, 146, …
Δ1: 5, 13, 25, 41, 61, …
Δ2: 8, 12, 16, 20, …
Δ3: 4, 4, 4, …
Dodecahedral numbers: 1, 20, 84, 220, 455, 816, …
Δ1: 19, 64, 136, 235, 361, …
Δ2: 45, 72, 99, 126, …
Δ3: 27, 27, 27, …
Icosahedral numbers: 1, 12, 48, 124, 255, 456, …
Δ1: 11, 36, 76, 131, 201, …
Δ2: 25, 40, 55, 70, …
Δ3: 15, 15, 15, …
Figure 2 shows the formation of a series of tetrahedral numbers using the differences Δ1. The second tetrahedral number 4 is created by adding the first difference Δ1 = 3 to the first tetrahedral number 1. Adding the following difference Δ1 = 6, a third tetrahedral number was formed 10 = 1 + 3 + 6. Adding the following difference Δ1 = 10, we get the fourth tetrahedral number 20 = 1 + 3 + 6 + 10, etc. Hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral numbers are formed analogously.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The generating functions for polygonal figurative numbers (see [1]) are also known:
The starting point for most generating functions (see [1]) is the geometric sequence:
The direct multiplication gives
3. Results and Discussion
Denote by S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 the sets of tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral figurative numbers, respectively.
Theorem 1.
The generating function for tetrahedral figurative numbers is
Proof.
This theorem actually states that
To prove (9), we use the following notation:
We can rewrite previous expression as
By applying differences Δ1 for tetrahedral numbers, the following holds:
Applying representation (1), we get
Further on
Taking the value x = 0.01, we get
In the result obtained, separating by two decimal places, we obtain tetrahedral numbers: 1, 4, 10, ...
That is,
Note that for value x = 0.01, tetrahedral numbers greater than 100 cannot be easily observed. In order to obtain better transparency, a value x = 0.001, or less, should be taken. This also holds in the following examples.
Theorem 2.
The generating function for hexahedral figurative numbers is
Proof.
This theorem states that
We prove this identity similarly as in the previous case.
Let
Then,
By applying the differences Δ1 for hexahedral numbers, the following holds:
From the equality (6), we obtain
Taking equality (7) leads to
By arranging this expression, we easily get the hexahedral figurative number generating function representation:
Taking the value x = 0.01, we get
In the result obtained, separating by two decimal places, we obtain hexahedral numbers: 1, 8, 27, 64, …
Theorem 3.
The generating function for octahedral figurative numbers is
Proof.
We need to prove that
For
From the equality (7), we obtain
By arranging this expression, we get that
Taking the value x = 0.01, we get
Separating by two decimal places, we obtain octahedral numbers:
Theorem 4.
The generating function for dodecahedral figurative numbers is
Proof.
We will prove this theorem by confirming that
We denote by
Then,
From the equality (6) and (7), we obtain
Taking the value x = 0.001, we get
Separating by 3 decimal places, we obtain dodecahedral numbers: 1, 20, 84, ….
Theorem 5.
The generating function for icosahedral figurative numbers is
Proof.
Let us show that the following identity is true:
Then,
Taking the value
Separating by 3 decimal places, we obtain icosahedral numbers: 1, 12, 48, ….
The obtained results can be reached in a different way. The authors of this paper chose the presented method because of its simplicity and obviousness.
4. Main Text
Polyhedron figurative numbers with their models exist in many scientific fields. In this paper, we presented a procedure for determining the generating function of tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral figurative numbers.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we determined tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral generating functions’ representation:
Applying the generating functions, we can generate strings of appropriate figurative numbers and apply them in further studies.
[1] M. M. Deza, E. Deza, Figurate Numbers, 2012.
[2] E. W. Weisstein, Triangular Numbers, 2002.
[3] E. W. Weisstein, Polygonal Number, 2002.
[4] A. S. Garge, S. A. Shirali, "Triangular numbers," Resonance, vol. 17 no. 7, pp. 672-681, DOI: 10.1007/s12045-012-0074-z, 2012.
[5] N. J. Sloane, S. Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, 1995.
[6] J. J. Tattersall, Elementary Number Theory in Nine Chapters, 2005.
[7] R. C. Castillo, "A survey on triangular number, factorial and some associated numbers," Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9 no. 41,DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/85182, 2016.
[8] M. A. M. Johari, K. A. M. Atan, S. H. Sapar, "Relation between square and centered pentagonal numbers," Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 6 no. 2, pp. 165-175, 2012.
[9] M. Kauers, P. Paule, The Concrete Tetrahedron: Symbolic Sums, Recurrence Equations, Generating Functions, Asymptotic Estimates, 2011.
[10] A. Barvinok, "The complexity of generating functions for integer points in polyhedra and beyond," Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians Madrid, vol. 3, pp. 763-787, .
[11] R. Fitzpatrick, Euclid’s Elements of Geometry, 2008.
[12] T. L. Heath, The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, 1956.
[13] D. Majewski, D. Liermann, P. Prohl, "The operational global icosahedral–hexagonal gridpoint model GME: description and high-resolution tests," Monthly Weather Review, vol. 130 no. 2, pp. 319-338, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0319:togihg>2.0.co;2, 2002.
[14] Y. Wang, S. Teitel, C. Dellago, "Melting of icosahedral gold nanoclusters from molecular dynamics simulations," The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 122 no. 21,DOI: 10.1063/1.1917756, 2005.
[15] P. Ganesh, M. Widom, "Signature of nearly icosahedral structures in liquid and supercooled liquid copper," Physical Review B, vol. 74 no. 13,DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.134205, 2006.
[16] R. Soklaski, Z. Nussinov, Z. Markow, F. Kelton, L. Yang, "Connectivity of icosahedral network and a dramatically growing static length scale in Cu-Zr binary metallic glasses," Physical Review B, vol. 87 no. 18,DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.184203, 2013.
[17] R. J. C. Gilbert, L. Beales, D. Blond, "Hepatitis B small surface antigen particles are octahedral," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102 no. 41, pp. 14783-14788, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505062102, 2005.
[18] R. Zandi, D. Reguera, R. F. Bruinsma, W. M. Gelbart, J. Rudnick, "Origin of icosahdral symmetry in viruses," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101 no. 44, pp. 15556-15560, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405844101, 2004.
[19] J. Dudek, A. Gózdz, N. Schunck, "Atomic nuclei with tetrahedral and octahedral symmetries," 2003. https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0303001
[20] K. Mazurek, J. Dudek, A. Góźdź, D. Curien, M. Kmiecik, A. Maj, "New nuclear stability islands of octahedral and tetrahedral shapes," Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 40 no. 3, 2009.
[21] L. E. Dickson, History of the Theory of Numbers: Diophantine Analysis, vol. 2, 2013.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2020 Miroslava Mihajlov Carević et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
In this paper, we are going to demonstrate a method for determining the generating functions of tetrahedral, hexahedral, octahedral, dodecahedral, and icosahedral figurative numbers. The method is based on the differences between the members of the series of the mentioned figurative numbers, as well as on the previously specified generating functions for the sequence
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer