It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Driving range and fast charge capability of electric vehicles are heavily dependent on the 3D microstructure of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) and substantial fundamental research is required to optimise electrode design for specific operating conditions. Here we have developed a full microstructure-resolved 3D model using a novel X-ray nano-computed tomography (CT) dual-scan superimposition technique that captures features of the carbon-binder domain. This elucidates how LiB performance is markedly affected by microstructural heterogeneities, particularly under high rate conditions. The elongated shape and wide size distribution of the active particles not only affect the lithium-ion transport but also lead to a heterogeneous current distribution and non-uniform lithiation between particles and along the through-thickness direction. Building on these insights, we propose and compare potential graded-microstructure designs for next-generation battery electrodes. To guide manufacturing of electrode architectures, in-situ X-ray CT is shown to reliably reveal the porosity and tortuosity changes with incremental calendering steps.
The 3D microstructure of the electrode predominantly determines the electrochemical performance of Li-ion batteries. Here, the authors show that the microstructural heterogeneities lead to non-uniform Li insertion and current distribution while graded-microstructures improve the performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University College London, Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349); The Faraday Institution, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.502947.d)
2 University of Pisa, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Pisa, Italy (GRID:grid.5395.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3729)
3 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, USA (GRID:grid.419357.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2199 3636)
4 University College London, Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); The Faraday Institution, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.502947.d)
5 University College London, Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
6 The Faraday Institution, Didcot, UK (GRID:grid.502947.d); University of Birmingham, School of Metallurgy and Materials, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
7 National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349)