It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Inflationary scenarios in string theory often involve a large number of light scalar fields, whose presence can enrich the post-inflationary evolution of primordial fluctuations generated during the inflationary epoch. We provide a simple example of such post-inflationary processing within an explicit string-inflationary construction, using a Kähler modulus as the inflaton within the framework of LARGE Volume Type-IIB string flux compactifications. We argue that inflationary models within this broad category often have a selection of scalars that are light enough to be cosmologically relevant, whose contributions to the primordial fluctuation spectrum can compete with those generated in the standard way by the inflaton. These models consequently often predict nongaussianity at a level, , potentially observable by the Planck satellite, with a bi-spectrum maximized by triangles with squeezed shape in a string realization of the curvaton scenario. We argue that the observation of such a signal would robustly prefer string cosmologies such as these that predict a multi-field dynamics during the very early universe.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 McMaster University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Hamilton, Canada (GRID:grid.25073.33) (ISNI:0000000419368227); Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.420198.6) (ISNI:0000000086580851)
2 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7683.a) (ISNI:0000000404920453)
3 CERN, Theory Division, Genève 23, Switzerland (GRID:grid.9132.9) (ISNI:0000000095478293); University of Oviedo, Department of Physics, Oviedo, Spain (GRID:grid.10863.3c) (ISNI:0000000121646351)
4 University of Cambridge, DAMTP/CMS, Cambridge, U.K. (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); Abdus Salam ICTP, Strada Costiera 11, Trieste, Italy (GRID:grid.419330.c) (ISNI:0000000121849917)
5 Universität Heidelberg, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000000121904373)
6 Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics and Physikalisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000000122403300)