Abstract

Soil fungi can help improve ecosystem restoration, yet our understanding of how they reassemble in degraded land is limited. Here, we studied fungal community structure using DNA metabarcoding in reforested sites following agricultural abandonment and overgrazing. Two treatments, namely 'reforestation using different numbers of tree species' and 'deer exclusion,' have been applied for multiple decades in the study sites. We found that local fungal richness (alpha diversity) and total fungal richness (gamma diversity) were 1.9-2.9 and 1.3-1.9 times greater, respectively, in reforested stands than in natural forests. These results were regardless of the number of tree species planted in the reforested stands. Conversely, reforested stands had a spatially homogenized community structure with relatively lower degrees of compositional dissimilarity among sites within each stand (beta diversity). These findings were attributable to lower environmental heterogeneity, stronger dispersal limitation, and a comparatively shorter time since the onset of community assembly in reforested stands. Deer exclosures had no detectable effect on fungal community structure. Overall, the agricultural legacy in fungal community structure appears to have persisted for decades, even under proactive restoration of aboveground vegetation. Direct human intervention belowground may therefore be necessary for the recovery of soil biota once altered.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Details

Title
Prolonged impacts of past agriculture and overgrazing on soil fungal communities in restored forests
Author
Tatsumi, Shinichi; Matsuoka, Shunsuke; Fujii, Saori; Kobayashi Makoto; Osono, Takashi; Isbell, Forest; Mori, Akira S
University/institution
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Section
New Results
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Mar 29, 2021
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
ISSN
2692-8205
Source type
Working Paper
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2400238813
Copyright
© 2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (“the License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.