It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Pesticides residue poses serious concerns to human health. The present study was carried out to determine the pesticide residues of peri-urban bovine milk (n = 1183) from five different sites (Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Guwahati, Ludhiana and Udaipur) in India and dietary exposure risk assessment to adults and children. Pesticide residues were estimated using gas chromatography with flame thermionic and electron capture detectors followed by confirmation on gas chromatography-mass spectrometer. The results noticed the contamination of milk with hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), dichloro-diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), endosulfan, cypermethrin, cyhalothrin, permethrin, chlorpyrifos, ethion and profenophos pesticides. The residue levels in some of the milk samples were observed to be higher than the respective maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticide. Milk samples contamination was found highest in Bhubaneswar (11.2%) followed by Bangalore (9.3%), Ludhiana (6.9%), Udaipur (6.4%) and Guwahati (6.3%). The dietary risk assessment of pesticides under two scenarios i.e. lower-bound scenario (LB) and upper-bound (UB) revealed that daily intake of pesticides was substantially below the prescribed acceptable daily intake except for fipronil in children at UB. The non-cancer risk by estimation of hazard index (HI) was found to be below the target value of one in adults at all five sites in India. However, for children at the UB level, the HI for lindane, DDT and ethion exceeded the value of one in Ludhiana and Udaipur. Cancer risk for adults was found to be in the recommended range of United States environment protection agency (USEPA), while it exceeded the USEPA values for children.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, School of Public Health and Zoonoses, Ludhiana, India (GRID:grid.411890.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1808 3035)
2 Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nandinagar, Karnataka Veterinary, Bidar, India (GRID:grid.411890.5)
3 Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, India (GRID:grid.411459.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9205 417X)
4 Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Veterinary University Road, Near Deen Dayal Upadhyay Circle, Bikaner, India (GRID:grid.464655.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1768 5915)
5 KIIT School of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, India (GRID:grid.464655.0)
6 Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India (GRID:grid.415361.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 0198)
7 International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya (GRID:grid.419369.0); Uppsala University, Zoonosis Science Centre, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.8993.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9457); Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.6341.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 8578 2742)
8 International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya (GRID:grid.419369.0)




