It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus (SBWMV) causes a serious viral disease that can significantly reduce grain yield in winter wheat worldwide. Using resistant cultivars is the only feasible strategy to reduce the losses caused by SBWMV. To fine map the resistance gene Sbwm1, 205 wheat accessions was genotyped using wheat Infinium iSelect Beadchips with 90 K SNPs. Association analysis identified 35 SNPs in 12 wheat genes and one intergenic SNP in the Sbwm1 region that showed a significant association with SBWMV resistance. Those SNPs were converted into Kompetitive Allele-Specific Polymerase assays (KASP) and analyzed in two F6-derived recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations derived from the crosses between two resistant cultivars ‘Wesley’ and ‘Deliver’ and a susceptible line ‘OK03825-5403-6’. Linkage analysis mapped this gene on chromosome 5D at intervals of 5.1 cM and 3.4 cM in the two populations, respectively. The two flanking markers in both populations delimited the gene to a 620 kb region where 19 genes were annotated. Comparative analysis identified a syntenic region of 660 kb in Ae. tauschii with 18 annotated genes and a syntenic region in chromosome 1 of B. distachyon. The candidate region includes several disease resistance related genes and we identified a PTI1-like tyrosine-protein kinase 1 gene as a putative candidate gene for Sbwm1. The two flanking SNPs for Sbwm1 can effectively separate the resistant and susceptible lines in a new diversity panel of 159 wheat germplasm. The results from this study lay a solid foundation for the cloning, functional characterization and marker-assisted selection of Sbwm1.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China (GRID:grid.440622.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9482 4676)
2 USDA-ARS, Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit, 4008 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, USA (GRID:grid.463419.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0946 3608); Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, USA (GRID:grid.36567.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0737 1259)
3 Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, USA (GRID:grid.36567.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0737 1259)
4 University of California- Davis, Department of Plant Science, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684)
5 Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, USA (GRID:grid.36567.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0737 1259); Chengdu Donnees Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.36567.31)
6 Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Manhattan, USA (GRID:grid.36567.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0737 1259)
7 Oklahoma State University, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Stillwater, USA (GRID:grid.65519.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0721 7331)