It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Invasive species present a major conservation threat globally and nowhere are their affects more pronounced than in island ecosystems. Determining how native island populations respond demographically to invasive species can provide information to mitigate the negative effects of invasive species. Using 20 years of mark-recapture data from three sympatric species of albatrosses (black-browed Thalassarche melanophris, grey-headed T. chrysostoma, and light-mantled albatrosses Phoebetria palpebrata), we quantified the influence of invasive European rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus and extreme weather patterns on breeding probability and success. Temporal variability in rabbit density explained 33–76% of the variability in breeding probability for all three species, with severe decreases in breeding probability observed after a lag period following highest rabbit numbers. For black-browed albatrosses, the combination of extreme rainfall and high rabbit density explained 33% of total trait variability and dramatically reduced breeding success. We showed that invasive rabbits and extreme weather events reduce reproductive output in albatrosses and that eliminating rabbits had a positive effect on albatross reproduction. This illustrates how active animal management at a local breeding site can result in positive population outcomes even for wide ranging animals like albatrosses where influencing vital rates during their at-sea migrations is more challenging.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 0263)
2 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.478592.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0598 3800)
3 Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 0263)
4 Parks, Water and Environment, Department of Primary Industries, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2)
5 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, Australia (GRID:grid.493042.8)
6 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)