Abstract

Invasive species present a major conservation threat globally and nowhere are their affects more pronounced than in island ecosystems. Determining how native island populations respond demographically to invasive species can provide information to mitigate the negative effects of invasive species. Using 20 years of mark-recapture data from three sympatric species of albatrosses (black-browed Thalassarche melanophris, grey-headed T. chrysostoma, and light-mantled albatrosses Phoebetria palpebrata), we quantified the influence of invasive European rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus and extreme weather patterns on breeding probability and success. Temporal variability in rabbit density explained 33–76% of the variability in breeding probability for all three species, with severe decreases in breeding probability observed after a lag period following highest rabbit numbers. For black-browed albatrosses, the combination of extreme rainfall and high rabbit density explained 33% of total trait variability and dramatically reduced breeding success. We showed that invasive rabbits and extreme weather events reduce reproductive output in albatrosses and that eliminating rabbits had a positive effect on albatross reproduction. This illustrates how active animal management at a local breeding site can result in positive population outcomes even for wide ranging animals like albatrosses where influencing vital rates during their at-sea migrations is more challenging.

Details

Title
Introduced species and extreme weather as key drivers of reproductive output in three sympatric albatrosses
Author
Cleeland, Jaimie B 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Pardo, Deborah 2 ; Raymond, Ben 1 ; Terauds Aleks 3 ; Alderman, Rachael 4 ; McMahon, Clive R 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Phillips, Richard A 2 ; Mary-Anne, Lea 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Hindell, Mark A 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 0263) 
 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.478592.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0598 3800) 
 Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 0263) 
 Parks, Water and Environment, Department of Primary Industries, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) 
 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, Australia (GRID:grid.493042.8) 
 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X) 
Publication year
2020
Publication date
2020
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2404348259
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.