It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The evolution of Sr2IrO4 upon carrier doping has been a subject of intense interest, due to its similarities to the parent cuprates, yet the intrinsic behaviour of Sr2IrO4 upon hole doping remains enigmatic. Here, we synthesize and investigate hole-doped Sr2−xKxIrO4 utilizing a combination of reactive oxide molecular-beam epitaxy, substitutional diffusion and in-situ angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Upon hole doping, we observe the formation of a coherent, two-band Fermi surface, consisting of both hole pockets centred at (π, 0) and electron pockets centred at (π/2, π/2). In particular, the strong similarities between the Fermi surface topology and quasiparticle band structure of hole- and electron-doped Sr2IrO4 are striking given the different internal structure of doped electrons versus holes.
Doped Sr2IrO4 is of interest because of its close similarities to La2CuO4, a parent compound of the cuprates. Nelson et al. reveal the intrinsic evolution of its electronic structure with hole doping by avoiding the strong in-plane disorder introduced by previously used chemical substitutions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Cornell University, Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Department of Physics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
2 Cornell University, Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Department of Physics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); University of Wisconsin, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.28803.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0701 8607)
3 Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
4 Cornell University, Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Department of Physics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)