It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Oxidative stress (OS) is associated with the onset of prostate cancer (PCa). The aims of this study are to examine whether OS biomarkers may be employed as external validating criteria for the diagnosis PCa. This case-control study recruited 204 subjects, 73 patients with PCa, 67 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and 64 healthy controls (HC) and assayed plasma prostate-specific antigen (PSA), protein thiol (−SH) groups, lipid hydroperoxides, carbonyl proteins (PCB), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP). -SH groups were significantly and inversely associated with PSA levels. PCa was characterized by lowered -SH groups and red blood cell TRAP levels, and higher PSA, AOPP and PCB levels as compared with BPH and HC. Support vector machine with 10-fold cross-validation showed that PSA values together with -SH groups, PCB and AOPP yielded a cross-validation accuracy of 96.34% for the differentiation of PCa from BPH and HC. The area under the ROC curve using PSA and -SH differentiating PCa from BPH and controls was 0.945. Moreover, lowered -SH, but not PSA, are associated with PCa metastasis and progression. Inflammatory biomarkers were not associated with PCa or BPH. PCa, its progression and metastatic PCa are characterized by lowered antioxidant defenses, especially lowered thiol groups, and increased oxidative stress toxicity, suggesting that these processes play a key role in the pathophysiology of PCa. An algorithm based on -SH and PSA values may be used to differentiate patients with PCa from those with BPH and controls.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Londrina, Cancer Institute of Londrina, Laboratory of Research in Applied Immunology, Londrina, Brazil (GRID:grid.411400.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 3537)
2 University of Londrina, Laboratory of Research in Applied Immunology, Londrina, Brazil (GRID:grid.411400.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 3537)
3 University of Londrina, Department of Pathology, Clinical Analysis and Toxicology, Laboratory of Research in Applied Immunology, Londrina, Brazil (GRID:grid.411400.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 3537)
4 University of Londrina, Department of Internal Medicine, Londrina, Brazil (GRID:grid.411400.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 3537)
5 Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia (GRID:grid.1021.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 7079)
6 University of Londrina, Department of Pathology Sciences, Londrina, Brazil (GRID:grid.411400.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 3537)