Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Globally, multiple strategies have been applied to reduce the disease burden of BC. Along with the promotion of BC screening and treatment, the incidence and mortality of BC in the United States have been decreasing in recent years [1]. However, the prognosis of cancer patients combined with BC was still concerning. Besides, the improvement of early detection and treatment technology could extend the life of cancer patients to a great extent in the future. The number of cancer survivors is estimated to reach 20.3 million by 2026 in the United States [2]. As survival improves, the accumulated first primary cancer patients may heighten the time interval needed for the development of second primary breast cancer (SPBC), which is becoming a growing obstacle to BC control [3, 4].
Considering the elevated risk of SPBC among female survivors with primary BC [5, 6], the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend that women undergoing a unilateral mastectomy or lumpectomy should be followed with annual mammography [7]. Besides BC, previous studies have observed elevated risks of SPBC among female patients with initial skin melanoma [8], thyroid cancer [9, 10], and ovarian cancer [11]. However, national guidelines on SPBC prevention or screening for cancer survivors remain limited. And the links between other primary cancers and the risk of subsequent SPBC is limited and controversial [12, 13]. Furthermore, this disparity of ethnicities and sex on subsequent risk of SPBC is still unknown.
Since the risk of developing SPBC in primary cancer survivors has not been well studied, we sought to investigate the trends of SPBC incidence over time and to explore the risk of developing SPBC among various site-specific cancer survivors stratified by sex, race, age, latency period, and treatment in the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Materials and methods
Study site and population
The National Cancer Institute’s SEER 13 database, a wildly used open-access cancer registry, covering approximately 13.4% of the US population from San Francisco-Oakland, Connecticut, Metropolitan Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Seattle/Puget Sound, Utah, Metropolitan Atlanta, San Jose-Monterey, Los Angeles, and rural Georgia was used in this study [14]. Site-specific invasive cancer cases were identified according to the International Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3rd Revision. Among the first primary cancer cases (3,798,691), those with a death certificate only (44,518), zero follow-up time (17,972) or missing follow-up time (15,503), and those survived less than 6 months (623,525) were excluded. Then, ductal or invasive SPBC diagnosed within 6 months of first primary cancer diagnosis (601) were further excluded as these were likely to be preexisting or synchronous cancers. The end of the follow-up was the date of the second primary cancer diagnosis, death, or most updated date of the dataset (December 31, 2015), whichever occurred first. Finally, a total of 1,566,538 female and 1,530,034 male initial primary cancer cases at risk for an SPBC were registered in SEER 13 between 1992 and 2015. The 20 most common first primary cancer sites in the United States in 2018 were selected, including oral cavity and pharynx, stomach, colon and rectum, liver and intrahepatic duct, pancreas, lung and bronchus, melanoma of the skin, breast, cervix uterus, corpus uteri, ovary, prostate, testis, bladder, kidney, central nervous system, thyroid, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), myeloma, and leukemia [15].
Statistical analysis
We compared the demographic characteristics of first primary breast cancer (FPBC) patients and SPBC patients, including age, race, stage, grade, size, the status of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), radiotherapy, and survival rates. Stage of BC was defined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th staging system. Survival rates were classified by the proportion of cancer patients survived ≤1 year, 1–5 years, 5–10 years, and >10 years. The difference between patient characteristics of FPBC and SPBC was computed by Chi-square tests.
The age-standardized incidence rates of SPBC and FPBC were calculated by direct standardization, using the standard population revealed by the World Health Organization (WHO 2000–2025). Trends in incidence of SPBC were calculated using the Joinpoint regression analysis which was proposed by Kim et al (Joinpoint Regression Software, Version 4.0.4-May 2013; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute) [16]. The average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were further estimated.
Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the corresponding 95% CI were used to compare the incidence rates of the observed cases of SPBC in cancer survivors over the expected cases in the general population [17]. The observed cases of SPBC were those developed BC after at least 6 months of the diagnosis of first primary cancer. The expected cases of SPBC were numbers in FPBC survivors calculated by BC risk in the general population with no cancer history. The subgroups analyses of SIR were further stratified by sites of first primary cancer, sex (female, male), age at diagnosis of first primary cancer (<50, ≥50 years), race [White, Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API)], latency period after first primary cancer diagnosis (6–11, 12–59, 60–119, ≥120 months), and treatment (with radiotherapy, without radiotherapy). The SIRs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated by the software of SEER*Stat MP-SIR, developed by the National Center for Health Statistics and the Census Bureau (https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/). Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
There were 49,587 female and 546 male SPBC cases observed during 1992–2015, accounting for 3.17% and 0.04% of the first primary cancer survivors, respectively. The characteristics of FPBC and SPBC are shown in Table 1. Compared with FPBC patients, SPBC patients were more likely to be White race, older (≥50 years), localized, better differentiated, hormone receptor-positive, and to have a smaller tumor size. However, the 10-year survival rate was significantly lower in SPBC patients than FPBC patients (17.18% vs 36.63%, P<0.0001).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Considering the small number of SPBC cases attributable to the short-latency in the first two years, the trend analyses of SPBC in both sexes started in 1994. The trends of FPBS and SPBC between 1994 and 2015 are presented as Fig 1A and 1B. The incidence of SPBC significantly increased during 1994–2015 in female and male cancer survivors, with AAPCs of 9.2% (95% CI: 8.0%-10.4%) and 5.4% (95% CI: 3.4%-7.5%), respectively. When stratified by age and ethnicity, all of the subgroups showed upward trends, with AAPCs ranging from 6.3% to 9.4% (Fig 1C and 1D).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Abbreviations: AAPC: average annual percentage change; API: Asian/Pacific Islander; FPBC: first primary breast cancer; SPBC: second primary breast cancer. Age-standardized rates of first primary per 100,000 and second primary breast cancer per 1,000,000 for female (A) and male (B), and age-standardized rates of second primary breast cancer per 1,000,000 for women stratified by age (C) and race (D).
Furthermore, the trends in age-standardized incidence of first primary cancers of both sexes stratified by ethnicity were provided in S1–S4 Figs. And the trend analyses of first primary cancers during 1992–2015 were showed in S1 Table. In the male population, the incidence of oral cavity and pharynx, stomach, colorectal, lung and bronchus, prostate, bladder, central nervous system, NHL, and leukemia presented significant downward trends, with AAPCs ranging from -0.7% to -3.8%. However, the incidence of liver and intrahepatic duct, pancreas, melanoma of the skin, testis, kidney, thyroid, and myeloma showed significant increasing trends, with AAPCs ranging from 0.3% to 3.0%. For Female patients, downward trends were observed in the incidence of oral cavity and pharynx, stomach, colorectal, lung and bronchus, cervix uterus, ovary, bladder, central nervous system, and leukemia, with AAPCs ranging from -0.3% to -1.8%. Additionally, significant upward trends were observed in the incidence of liver and intrahepatic duct, pancreas, melanoma of the skin, kidney, and thyroid cancer, with AAPCs ranging from 0.3% to 4.5%.
Overall, initial cancer survivors had significantly elevated risks of developing SPBC in both sexes (SIR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.34–1.36; SIR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.26, respectively) compared with the general population (Table 2). Significant differences of the subsequent SPBC were found between patients with or without breast initial cancer. BC in females (61.85%) and prostate cancer in males (43.33%) were the most common first primary cancers for subsequent SPBC, respectively. Further analyses by cancer sites revealed that patients with BC, thyroid cancer, melanoma of the skin, and corpus uteri cancer presented significantly elevated risks of SPBC when compared with the general population, with SIRs of 1.74 (95% CI: 1.72–1.76), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10–1.23), 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04–1.12) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01–1.09), respectively. Male survivors with initial BC or leukemia were at higher risk of developing SPBC when compared with the general male population, with SIRs of 34.86 (95% CI: 25.23–46.95) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.20–3.29), respectively.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The SIRs for female SPBC stratified by age are presented in Fig 2. Compared with older cancer patients (≥50 years), the younger ones (<50 years) harbored a higher risk of developing SPBC. Female patients with BC or thyroid cancer harbored elevated risk of subsequent SPBC in both age groups, with SIRs of 2.98 (95% CI: 2.92–3.04) and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10–1.30) in younger age group, and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.44–1.48) and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.06–1.23) in older age group, respectively. In addition, the risk of developing SPBC was significantly higher in older female patients with previous melanoma of the skin (SIR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.16), or corpus uteri cancer (SIR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05–1.13) compared with the general population.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Stratified analyses by race (White, Black, and API) showed elevated risks of SPBC among female cancer survivors across the three populations (Fig 3). The SIRs of developing SPBC in female FPBC patients ranged from 1.61 to 2.65 in the three ethnicities. In addition, the white women with primary skin melanoma or thyroid cancer were at elevated risk of developing SPBC (SIR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07–1.16; SIR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.21, respectively). Elevated risk of subsequent SPBC was also observed in API female patients with non-breast primary cancer (SIR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.28), especially among patients with corpus uteri cancer (SIR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.42–1.82), ovarian cancer (SIR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08–1.67), bladder cancer (SIR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.05–2.03), kidney cancer (SIR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.26–2.24), or thyroid cancer (1.53, 95% CI: 1.26–2.24).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The risk of SPBC among female cancer patients by follow-up period is shown in S2 Table. Elevated SIRs were observed in all four latency periods among FPBC patients, and the SIRs increased with latency periods. For female patients with skin melanoma, increased risk of SPBC was noticed within 1–10 years after primary diagnosis. Elevated SIRs were also found among female patients with corpus uteri cancer during the follow-up period between 6 months and 10 years. After a 1-year latency of thyroid diagnosis, the observed risk of SPBC was higher than expected. The risk of SPBC increased after 10 years of primary diagnosis of NHL.
Increased SIRs were found among female patients with FPBC or thyroid cancer regardless of radiation treatment (S3 Table). Besides, female patients with primary skin melanoma or corpus uteri cancer receiving no radiation therapy were at higher risk of developing SPBC when compared with the general population.
Discussion
During 1994–2015, the incidence of female and male SPBC in the United States increased by 9.2% and 5.4% per year, respectively. Compared with the general population, the sex-specific risk of developing SPBC among female and male cancer survivors rose by 35% and 16%, respectively. In addition, female patients with FPBC, skin melanoma, thyroid cancer, corpus uteri cancer; and male patients with FPBC, leukemia were at elevated risk of developing SPBC. On the other hand, female patients with stomach, colon and rectum, liver and intrahepatic duct, lung and bronchus, cervix uterus, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, myeloma, and leukemia were at lower risk of SPBC. Furthermore, younger cancer survivors had a higher risk of subsequent SPBC compared with the elders. Besides, compared with the API general population, the non-breast primary female patients were also at an elevated risk of developing SPBC. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study that identified various site-specific cancer survivors at elevated risk of SPBC, which could offer convincible evidence for further BC prevention and screening practice on targeted first primary cancer survivors with elevated risks of SPBC.
The higher than expected incidence of SPBC might be partly explained by the greater medical surveillance among cancer survivors than the general population. It is worth noting that the risk of developing SPBC is much elevated in male FPBC patients than female FPBC cases. FPBC has been confirmed as a risk indicator for SPBC in women [6, 18]. Besides, previous studies have reported a 30%-52% increased risk of developing SPBC in male primary BC survivors when compared with the general population [19–21]. Prolonged survival associated with early diagnosis and definitive surgery and therapy plays a role in the increased risk of SPBC in both sexes. Apart for the shared similar risk factors such as hormonal, familial, and genetic risk factors in female and male BC patients [22], additional risk factors such as Klinefelter syndrome, gynaecomastia, and testicular disease might have partly contributed to the profound elevated risk for SPBC in male BC patients [23, 24]. Also, this might be a function of the impact of hormonal therapy interacting with the androgen/estrogen profile in men versus women. Moreover, men are more prone to have drinking or smoking behavior than women, which might partly have contributed to the sharp increase trend of SPBC in men.
In accordance with the present results, previous studies have reported an elevated incidence of SPBC in thyroid cancer survivors [9, 10]. Potential mechanisms for the association between thyroid cancer and subsequent BC include the shared common risk factors of hormone, genetics, and environment. One of the molecular pathogenesis of the elevated risk of SPBC in thyroid cancer patients could be the high ER levels in thyroid cancer patients compared with the general population in whom sex steroid receptors are present in human thyroid tissue [25, 26]. It should be noted that the incidence of first primary thyroid cancer showed significantly increasing trends. Thus, the SPBC control among thyroid cancer survivors should be strengthened.
The significantly increased risk of SPBC (SIR = 1.08) among female skin melanoma patients is consistent with previous findings (SIRs from 1.07 to 4.10) [27–30]. Cutaneous melanoma and BC share common mutations at susceptibility genes, like BRCA2 and CDKN2A [31]. Besides, both melanoma and BC cells exhibit ERs. It is possible that hormonal factors in melanoma cancer survivors promote the development of SPBC [32]. In addition, melanoma and BC frequently happened among women with high socioeconomic status, which might be another reason for the increased risk of SPBC in melanoma survivors [33]. Race stratified analysis revealed that only white patients with melanoma were at increased risk of SPBC, which could be due to the high incidence of skin melanoma in white women but less often in the other two races. Moreover, the increasing incidence of skin melanoma also might be partly attributed to the upward trend of the following SPBC. Besides, the elevated risk of SPBC among female melanoma was only observed in older patients but not in younger ones. Although the mechanism is not well known, it is referred that later menopausal (≥50 years) melanoma patients might have an increased risk of developing BC, and postmenopausal estrogen therapy for melanoma survivors may also lead to a higher risk of SPBC than the general population.
This study found close associations between primary gynecological cancers and SPBC, especially in the API population. API women with a previous history of ovarian or corpus uteri cancer presented an elevated risk of SPBC, which is in agreement with previous studies conducted in the Asian population from Taiwan [11, 13]. It might be partly explained by the higher survival rate among API ovarian or corpus uteri cancer patients. Several of the underlying mechanisms of the ovary-breast link have been addressed previously. Patients carrying mutations in BRCA or TP53 have significantly increased lifetime risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer [34, 35]. Nonetheless, due to the lack of optimal genetic testing in Asian ovarian cancer patients [36], much less is known regarding the mechanisms of the race effect on the ovary-breast link. Further research is needed to clarify the biological and environmental mechanisms on the monotonically elevated risk of SPBC following corpus uteri or ovary cancer among the API population.
Furthermore, the elevated risk of SPBC in previous kidney or bladder cancer patients was also observed in API women. The kidney-breast cancer link was inconsistent in previous publications. Murray et al recently found a lower than expected rate of BC in renal cortical neoplasms using a 90 day of latency [37]. While a study based on the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort indicated the kidney-breast association by revealing an excessive risk of kidney cancer among BC survivors [38]. However, no study has reported the increased risk of SPBC in patients with kidney cancer until now. For bladder cancer, this study is in line with a previous study that observed an elevated risk of BC in female patients with first primary bladder cancer in Korea [39]. It was hypothesized that fumarate hydratase germline mutations in bladder and BC patients might partly contribute to the phenomenon [40]. Additionally, the upward trends in the incidence of first primary bladder and kidney cancer reinforced the benefit to lower first primary cancers in BC control. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms of increased risk of SPBC among API female patients with kidney or bladder cancer.
The risk of SPBC significantly elevated after 10 years of primary NHL diagnosis, which is in agreement with a study conducted by Bluhm et al [41]. It might be attributable to the long-term effects of radiotherapy, or the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy of NHL.
As for male cancer survivors, leukemia survivors had an elevated risk of SPBC. This finding is novel, as BC has not been reported to occur more frequently after the first primary leukemia diagnosis in the previous studies. This could potentially highlight the similarity in disease biology in male leukemia and BC.
Our study is based on the SEER database, which is one of the largest cancer registries and enables adequate analysis of multiple malignancies during the long-term follow-up period. Our study is of importance since we supplied the specific initial cancers with elevated risks of SPBC by using the most recent data with a large number of cases. This study is novel because many previous studies did not stratify according to race and we revealed that API cancer patients possessed a higher risk of developing SPBC when compared with other ethnicities in the United States. Moreover, this study combined the trends in incidence of site-specific first primary cancers with the expected risk of SPBC, which could offer more evidence for the identification of high-risk groups on SPBC prevention and control.
The present study has several limitations. First, first primary cancer patients of different ages with different types and severity of cancer could have varying life expectancy to develop SPBC, which might undermine the generalization of the results. However, with the development of medical treatment, the prolonging life-span of all kinds of cancer patients may increase the risk of developing SPBC. Thus, the result of this study still emphasized the SPBC control of specific cancer survivors. Second, the first primary cancer patients who have moved out of the 13 SEER registry areas before the confirmation of SPBC could be missed. Third, this study lack of detailed clinical treatments to support the association of initial cancer and SPBC. Forth, we could not adjust for some potential confounding risk factors for cancer, such as the family history of cancer, and reproductive or lifestyle factors of the patients in the present work. Also, individual genetic factors were not available; therefore, further mechanisms between primary cancers and SPBC cannot be addressed.
Conclusions
Although cancer history has been considered as a risk factor for SPBC, further exploration reveals that the risk of developing SPBC varies by sex (female: breast, skin melanoma, thyroid, and corpus uteri; male: breast, and leukemia), age at onset of primary cancer (<50 years: breast, and thyroid; ≥50 years: breast, skin melanoma, thyroid, and corpus uteri), and race (White: breast, skin melanoma, and thyroid; Black: breast; API: breast, corpus uteri, ovary, bladder, and kidney). Our study suggests that more detailed recommendations are needed in the prevention and screening of SPBC among site-specific cancer survivors. Further studies are also needed to address the molecular/genomic and common epidemiological etiologies affecting the development of SPBC among patients with initial cancers.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. The age-standardized incidence of site-specific first primary cancers in the whole population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s001
(PNG)
S2 Fig. The age-standardized incidence of site-specific first primary cancers in White population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s002
(PNG)
S3 Fig. The age-standardized incidence of site-specific first primary cancers in Black population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s003
(PNG)
S4 Fig. The age-standardized incidence of site-specific first primary cancers in Asian/Pacific Islander population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s004
(PNG)
S1 Table. Trends in age-standardized rates of site-specific first primary cancer patients.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s005
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Risk of female second primary breast cancer after previous malignancy stratified by initial primary site and latency period.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s006
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Risk of female second primary breast cancer after previous malignancy stratified by initial primary site and radiation.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s007
(DOCX)
S1 Data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800.s008
(ZIP)
Citation: Cheng Y, Huang Z, Liao Q, Yu X, Jiang H, He Y, et al. (2020) Risk of second primary breast cancer among cancer survivors: Implications for prevention and screening practice. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0232800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232800
About the Authors:
Yao Cheng
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Ziming Huang
Roles: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Qing Liao
Roles: Investigation, Resources, Software
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Xingchen Yu
Roles: Data curation, Software, Validation
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Hongyu Jiang
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Yangting He
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Software
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Shuang Yao
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Shaofa Nie
Contributed equally to this work with: Shaofa Nie, Li Liu
Roles: Supervision, Validation, Visualization
E-mail: [email protected] (LL); [email protected] (SN)
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Li Liu
Contributed equally to this work with: Shaofa Nie, Li Liu
Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation
E-mail: [email protected] (LL); [email protected] (SN)
Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
1. Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018.
2. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA-Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–289. pmid:27253694
3. Sadler C, Goldfarb M. Comparison of Primary and Secondary Breast Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults. Cancer. 2015;121(8):1295–1302. pmid:25537724
4. Keegan THM, Bleyer A, Rosenberg AS, Li Q, Goldfarb M. Second Primary Malignant Neoplasms and Survival in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(11):1554–1557. pmid:28426850
5. Moskowitz CS, Chou JF, Wolden SL, Bernstein JL, Malhotra J, Friedman DN, et al. Breast Cancer After Chest Radiation Therapy for Childhood Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(21): 2217–2223. pmid:24752044
6. Soerjomataram I, Louwman WJ, Lemmens V, de Vries E, Klokman WJ, Coebergh JWW. Risks of second primary breast and urogenital cancer following female breast cancer in the south of The Netherlands, 1972–2001. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(15):2331–2337. pmid:16140007
7. Bevers TB, Helvie M, Bonaccio E, Calhoun KE, Daly MB, Farrar WB, et al. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2018;16(11):1362–1389. pmid:30442736
8. Caini S, Boniol M, Botteri E, Tosti G, Bazolli B, Russell-Edu W, et al. The risk of developing a second primary cancer in melanoma patients: A comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;75(1):3–9. pmid:24680127
9. Joseph KR, Edirimanne S, Eslick GD. The association between breast cancer and thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;152(1):173–181. pmid:26058757
10. Nielsen SM, White MG, Hong SS, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Kaplan EL, Angelos P, et al. The Breast-Thyroid Cancer Link: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(2):231–238. pmid:26908594
11. Hung YP, Liu CJ, Hu YW, Chen MH, Li CP, Yeh CM, et al. Secondary Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients with Ovarian Cancer in Taiwan a Nationwide Population-Based Study. Medicine. 2015;94(38):e1626. pmid:26402833
12. Bergfeldt K, Einhorn S, Rosendahl I, Hall P. Increased risk of second primary malignancies in patients with gynecological cancer: A Swedish record-linkage study. Acta Oncologica (Stockholm). 1995;34(6):771–777. pmid:7576744
13. Lee KD, Chen CY, Huang HJ, Wang TY, Teng D, Huang SH, et al. Increased risk of second primary malignancies following uterine cancer: a population-based study in Taiwan over a 30-year period. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:393. pmid:25957789
14. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat database. https://seer.cancer.gov/data-software/documentation/seerstat/nov2017/. Accessed January 1, 2018.
15. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://gco.iarc.fr/. Accessed January 1, 2018.
16. Kim HJ, Yu B, Feuer EJ. Inference in segmented line regression: a simulation study. J Stat Comput Simul. 2008;78(11):1087–1103.
17. Utada M, Ohno Y, Hori M, Soda M. Incidence of Multiple Primary Cancers and Interval Between First and Second Primary Cancers. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(7):890–896. pmid:24814518
18. Murakami R, Hiyama T, Hanai A, Fujimoto I. Second primary cancers following female breast cancer in Osaka, Japan—a population-based cohort study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1987;17(4):293–302. pmid:3694826
19. Farr DE, Thomas A, Khan SA, Schroeder MC. Male Breast Cancer as a Second Primary Cancer: Increased Risk Following Lymphoma. Oncologist. 2017;22(8):895–900. pmid:28487463
20. Auvinen A, Curtis RE, Ron E. Risk of subsequent cancer following breast cancer in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(17):1330–1332. pmid:12208898
21. Satram-Hoang S, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Risk of second primary cancer in men with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(1):R10. pmid:17254323
22. Gao Y, Heller SL, Moy L. Male Breast Cancer in the Age of Genetic Testing: An Opportunity for Early Detection, Tailored Therapy, and Surveillance. Radiographics. 2018;38(5):1289–1311. pmid:30074858
23. Hultborn R, Hanson C, Kopf I, Verbiene I, Warnhammar E, Weimarck A. Prevalence of Klinefelter's syndrome in male breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1997;17(6D):4293–4297. pmid:9494523
24. Lynch HT, Watson P, Narod SA. The genetic epidemiology of male breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86(5):744–746. pmid:10463967
25. Manole D, Schildknecht B, Gosnell B, Adams E, Derwahl M. Estrogen promotes growth of human thyroid tumor cells by different molecular mechanisms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(3):1072–1077. pmid:11238488
26. Saraiva PP, Figueiredo NB, Padovani CR, Brentani MM, Nogueira CR. Profile of thyroid hormones in breast cancer patients. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2005;38(5):761–765.
27. Wassberg C, Thorn M, Yuen J, Hakulinen T, Ringborg U. Cancer risk in patients with earlier diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in situ. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(3):314–317. pmid:10495422
28. Spanogle JP, Clarke CA, Aroner S, Swetter SM. Risk of second primary malignancies following cutaneous melanoma diagnosis: A population-based study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(5):757–767. pmid:20223559
29. Levi F, Randimbison L, Te VC, Conconi MM, La Vecchia C. Risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer after skin cancer diagnosis. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(12):2899–2901. pmid:18770862
30. Soerjomataram I, Louwman WJ, Lemmens V, Coebergh JWW, de Vries E. Are patients with skin cancer at lower risk of developing colorectal or breast cancer? Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(12):1421–1429. pmid:18424428
31. Borg A, Sandberg T, Nilsson K, Johannsson O, Klinker M, Masback A, et al. High frequency of multiple melanomas and breast and pancreas carcinomas in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(15):1260–1266. pmid:10922411
32. Stedman KE, Moore GE, Morgan RT. Estrogen receptor proteins in diverse human tumors. Arch Surg. 1980;115(3):244–248. pmid:7356378
33. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):417–435. pmid:19002764
34. Antoniou A, Pharoah PDP, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–1130. pmid:12677558
35. Daly MB, Pilarski R, Axilbund JE, Buys SS, Crawford B, Friedman S, et al. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12(9):1326–1338.
36. Shanmughapriya S, Nachiappan V, Natarajaseenivasan K. BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in the Ovarian Cancer Population across Race and Ethnicity: Special Reference to Asia. Oncology. 2013;84(4):226–232. pmid:23364291
37. Murray KS, Zabor EC, Spaliviero M, Russo P, Bazzi WM, Musser JE, et al. Second primary malignancies in renal cortical neoplasms: an updated evaluation from a single institution. World J Urol. 2016;34(12):1667–1672. pmid:27106493
38. Ricceri F, Fasanelli F, Giraudo MT, Sieri S, Tumino R, Mattiello A, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies in women with breast cancer: Results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer. 2015;137(4):940–948. pmid:25650288
39. Kwon WA, Joung JY, Lim J, Oh CM, Jung KW, Kim SH, et al. Risk of second primary Cancer among bladder Cancer patients: a population-based cohort study in Korea. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):617. pmid:29855390
40. Lehtonen HJ, Kiuru M, Ylisaukko-oja SK, Salovaara R, Herva R, Koivisto PA, et al. Increased risk of cancer in patients with fumarate hydratase germline mutation. J Med Genet. 2006;43(6):523–526. pmid:16155190
41. Bluhm EC, Ronckers C, Hayashi RJ, Neglia JP, Mertens AC, Stovall M, et al. Cause-specific mortality and second cancer incidence after non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood. 2008;111(8):4014–4021. pmid:18258798
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020 Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Second primary breast cancer (SPBC) is becoming one of the major obstacles to breast cancer (BC) control. This study was aimed to determine the trend of SPBC incidence over time and the risk of developing SPBC in site-specific primary cancer survivors in the United States. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 13 registry (1992–2015) was used to identify SPBC patients with previous malignancies. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was computed to compare the incidence rates of the observed cases of SPBC in cancer survivors over the expected cases in the general population. Elevated risk of SPBC was observed in women with previous BC (SIR = 1.74) or thyroid cancer (SIR = 1.17). Women with initial skin melanoma in older age (≥50 years) (SIR = 1.11), or White race (SIR = 1.11) presented an elevated incidence of SPBC than the general female population. Besides, Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women with cancer of corpus uteri, ovary, bladder, or kidney were prone to developing SPBC when compared with the general population, with SIRs of 1.61, 1.35, 1.48, and 1.70, respectively. Male BC patients showed profound risk of developing SPBC (SIR = 34.86). Male leukemia patients also presented elevated risk of developing SPBC (SIR = 2.06). Our study suggests significant increase of SPBC in both sexes in the United States. Elevated risk of SPBC exists in survivors with primary BC, female thyroid cancer, male leukemia, and API female cancer patients with primary genitourinary cancer. Our study is helpful in developing strategies for BC control and prevention on specific first primary cancer survivors with an elevated risk of SPBC.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer