It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cancer cells differ in size from those of their host tissue and are known to change in size during the processes of cell death. A noninvasive method for monitoring cell size would be highly advantageous as a potential biomarker of malignancy and early therapeutic response. This need is particularly acute in brain tumours where biopsy is a highly invasive procedure. Here, diffusion MRI data were acquired in a GL261 glioma mouse model before and during treatment with Temozolomide. The biophysical model VERDICT (Vascular Extracellular and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumours) was applied to the MRI data to quantify multi-compartmental parameters connected to the underlying tissue microstructure, which could potentially be useful clinical biomarkers. These parameters were compared to ADC and kurtosis diffusion models, and, measures from histology and optical projection tomography. MRI data was also acquired in patients to assess the feasibility of applying VERDICT in a range of different glioma subtypes. In the GL261 gliomas, cellular changes were detected according to the VERDICT model in advance of gross tumour volume changes as well as ADC and kurtosis models. VERDICT parameters in glioblastoma patients were most consistent with the GL261 mouse model, whilst displaying additional regions of localised tissue heterogeneity. The present VERDICT model was less appropriate for modelling more diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, but could be tuned to improve the representation of these tumour types. Biophysical modelling of the diffusion MRI signal permits monitoring of brain tumours without invasive intervention. VERDICT responds to microstructural changes induced by chemotherapy, is feasible within clinical scan times and could provide useful biomarkers of treatment response.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, University College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
2 Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
4 Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
5 Division of Neuropathology, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
6 National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK (GRID:grid.436283.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 2631)