It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Volcanoes with multiple summit vents present a methodological challenge for determining vent-specific gas emissions. Here, using a novel approach combining multiple ultraviolet cameras with synchronous aerial measurements, we calculate vent-specific gas compositions and fluxes for Stromboli volcano. Emissions from vent areas are spatially heterogeneous in composition and emission rate, with the central vent area dominating passive emissions, despite exhibiting the least explosive behaviour. Vents exhibiting Strombolian explosions emit low to negligible passive fluxes and are CO2-dominated, even during passive degassing. We propose a model for the conduit system based on contrasting rheological properties between vent areas. Our methodology has advantages for resolving contrasting outgassing dynamics given that measured bulk plume compositions are often intermediate between those of the distinct vent areas. We therefore emphasise the need for a vent-specific approach at multi-vent volcanoes and suggest that our approach could provide a transformative advance in volcano monitoring applications.
Combining multiple ultraviolet cameras with synchronous aerial measurements, the authors here present vent-specific gas compositions and fluxes for Stromboli volcano. The results show that gas compositions vary between different vents, mirroring differences in eruptive behavior.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262)
2 University College London, Department of Earth Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 University of Bristol, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
4 DiSTeM, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy (GRID:grid.10776.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 5517)
5 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)
6 University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262); the University of Sydney, School of Geosciences, Camperdown, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X); University of Southern Queensland, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, Toowoomba, Australia (GRID:grid.1048.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0473 0844)