It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fast acquisition MRI in suspected cases of paediatric appendicitis presenting to a tertiary referral hospital.
Materials and methods
A prospective study was undertaken between May and October 2017 of 52 children who presented with suspected appendicitis and were referred for an abdominal ultrasound. All patients included in this study received both an abdominal ultrasound and five-sequence MRI consisting of axial and coronal gradient echo T2 scans, fat-saturated SSFSE and a diffusion-weighted scan. Participants were randomised into groups of MRI with breath-holds or MRI with free breathing. A patient satisfaction survey was also carried out. Histopathology findings, where available, were used as a gold standard for the purposes of data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity of 25% and 92.9%, respectively. MRI with breath-hold had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 66.7%, respectively, whilst MRI with free breathing was superior with sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 84.2%, respectively. MRI with free breathing was also more time efficient (p < 0.0001). Group statistics were comparable (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The use of fast acquisition MRI protocols, particularly free breathing sequences, for patients admitted with suspected appendicitis can result in faster diagnosis, treatment and discharge. It also has a statistically significant diagnostic advantage over ultrasound. Additionally, the higher specificity of MR can reduce the number of negative appendectomies performed in tertiary centres.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Cork University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.411916.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0617 6269)
2 Cork University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.411916.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0617 6269); University College Cork, Department of Radiology, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
3 University College Cork, Department of Radiology, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
4 University College Cork, School of Medicine, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
5 Cork University Hospital, PET/CT-MRI Unit, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.411916.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0617 6269)
6 Cork University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.411916.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0617 6269)
7 University College Cork, Department of Radiography, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)