It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The fundamental aspects related to the mechanisms of action of C60 fullerene nanoparticles on the level of the central nervous system in different experimental conditions are still unclear. Electrophysiological investigation and immunohistochemical techniques of c-fos expression were combined to determine which neural elements within the lumbar segments and in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) are activated under skeletal muscle fatigue development with prior application of C60 fullerenes (dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and in distilled water, FDS). After high-frequency electrical stimulation of the triceps surae muscle, the main fatigue-related increases in the c-Fos expression level were registered ipsilaterally within lamina 1 and 5 of the lumbar segments and within the contralateral capsular part of the CeA. C60 fullerene pretreatment in animals with subsequent electrical stimulation induced a distinct (2–4 times) decrease in the level of Fos immunoreactivity in the observed structures in comparison with only fatigue-induced rats. It can be supposed that FDS, as antioxidant compound, can decrease the concentration of free radicals in fatigued tissue and reduce the transmission intensity of nociceptive information from muscles to the spinal cord and amygdala, thereby changing the level of c-Fos expression within the lumbar segments and CeA.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Department of Movement Physiology, Kyiv, Ukraine (GRID:grid.417551.3); Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Physical Education, Gdansk, Poland (GRID:grid.445131.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1359 8636)
2 Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Department of Movement Physiology, Kyiv, Ukraine (GRID:grid.417551.3)
3 Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Department of Physical Education, Gdansk, Poland (GRID:grid.445131.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1359 8636)
4 Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology UG-MUG, Laboratory of Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland (GRID:grid.8585.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2370 4076)
5 Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Department of Cytology, Kyiv, Ukraine (GRID:grid.417551.3)
6 Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Department of Hypoxic States Investigation, Kyiv, Ukraine (GRID:grid.417551.3)