Introduction
Biogeochemical cycling and functioning of marine coastal and shelf sea
systems crucially relies on particle transport. Vertical fluxes of suspended
particulate matter (SPM) are determined by sinking velocity and
indirectly affect the horizontal transport. In coastal systems, SPM is
composed of living and nonliving particulate organic matter (POM) and fine
cohesive and non-cohesive resuspended minerals. Fine-grained minerals of
sizes typically up to 8 m and POM can undergo
aggregation and fragmentation processes that change sinking velocity and thus
transport properties. As a consequence of flocculation, SPM aggregates
ubiquitously possess a broad spectrum of size and composition
. This heterogeneity between flocs increases the
methodological effort required to analyze in situ
. On larger scales, SPM concentration (SPMC) and
composition additionally exhibit strong spatiotemporal variability that is the result of manifold interplaying processes. Tidal and wind-induced
currents are the major driver for resuspension and subsequent horizontal
transport, while biological processes, such as algae growth and bio-induced
sediment stabilization , interfere and thus
shape the complex distribution of SPM in coastal and estuarine systems.
Typically, SPMC and composition show cross-shore gradients
. In shallow waters near the coast,
where turbulence and thus resuspension are high, SPMC consists of flocs that
are mainly composed of mineral particles with high densities. By contrast, in
deeper offshore regions, SPMC is lower and the flocs are looser and more
organic. This general pattern of changing SPMC and composition from coast to
open waters is typical for our research area, the German Bight
, and is observed worldwide in estuaries
The sinking velocity of SPM is determined by floc size and density, both resulting from a complex interplay of processes. Particle size distribution is locally governed by restructuring , aggregation and processes mainly driven by turbulence-induced shear, . This turbulence is generated by energy dissipation with kinematic viscosity . Under a given shear regime, aggregation is controlled by floc volume concentration and the adhesion properties of the primary particles of mineral and organic origin that form the floc. The higher the volume concentration of flocs, the higher is the encounter rate. Subsequently, adhesion forces of the particles involved eventually determine the probability of the particles sticking together. In addition, adhesive forces limit the intrusion of particles during clustering and loosen the floc structure . This leads to a floc morphology that shows self-similar fractal scaling . As a result, aggregates possess decreased density compared to the aggregates comprising primary particles. In addition, adhesion forces between the particles within a floc strengthen the resistance of aggregates to fragmentation , while the smallest eddies, with sizes on the Kolmogorov microscale , potentially limit the maximum particle size . In sum, is locally governed by turbulence-driven processes whose rates depend on the physicochemical properties and volume concentration of particles.
To date, there is still a lack of understanding of how environmental conditions and especially biological processes affect physicochemical properties and thus of cohesive SPM. Typically, a power law relation between median and SPMC is postulated and found at local measurements . However, these relations vary considerably in their power factor among different systems as summarized by for various estuaries. This variation can be attributed to different shear stresses and physicochemical properties of the particles involved. They are particularly subjected to algae and microbial extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) excretions such as transparent exopolymer particles (TEPs) that are known to mediate aggregation processes. TEPs bridge and glue mineral particles together and potentially increase resistance to particle fragmentation . By these mechanisms, TEPs are hypothesized to enable phytoplankton to clear the water column of suspended sediments . Such clearing ability may contribute to spatial variability of , which would affect biogeochemical cycles. So far, knowledge on spatial variations of on a system scale is rare. A study on a transect in San Francisco Bay has been carried out , but generally, there is no systematic understanding of the relevance of sedimentation variability for biogeochemical cycles in coastal ecosystems. Such knowledge, though, is needed to understand and model coastal shelf biogeochemistry and sedimentology. For example, it is still an ongoing scientific discussion which processes are involved and to what extent they sustain the net sediment transport towards the Dutch, German and Danish coast into the Wadden Sea . We therefore aim at a reconstruction and analysis of the of SPM for the German Bight, North Sea. We develop a new approach to retrieve from high-resolution turbidity profiles in combination with vertical mixing rates estimated by a hydrodynamical model. Our findings are discussed particularly in light of their relevance for biogeochemical cycling of matter in coastal waters.
Methods
In the following section, the study area, sampling and preprocessing of observational data are described. We further explain the procedure for extracting sinking velocities from observations with the aid of hydrodynamical model results.
Study area
The surveyed area of the German Bight (Fig. ) is located in the southeast of the North Sea and features a typical depth of about 30 to a maximum of 50 . The North Sea is a shallow shelf sea with an average depth of 80 and is connected to the North Atlantic via the English Channel in the southwest and opens towards the north, spanning the European continental shelf. The North Sea is exposed to tides whose tidal range is between approximately 1.8 and 3.4 in the southeastern German Bight. The main North Sea tidal wave turns counterclockwise and drives the large-scale current system . SPM originating from the British coast is transported eastwards by the East Anglian Plume and occasionally reaches the surveyed area . In the southern North Sea, SPM and dissolved nutrients that enter through the River Rhine are transported eastward along the Dutch and German East Frisian shore by this large-scale current system. In addition, the German rivers Ems, Weser and Elbe discharge into the German Bight. As a result of the riverine nutrient input, the German Bight features a generally high primary productivity while it possesses pronounced heterogeneity with strong cross-shore gradients in (i) nutrients and (ii) SPMC and composition . The near-coastal waters of the German Bight are characterized by relatively high SPMC of few to several hundred grams per cubic meter in near-bottom regions. SPMC possesses a pronounced seasonality, showing higher values in winter than in summer. In the shallow parts of the tidal back barriers of the Wadden Sea, this seasonal pattern is reflected by the bottom fraction of fine, cohesive sediments accumulating during spring and summer due to aggregation and subsequent increased sedimentation . The sediment catchment area for the Dutch and East Frisian Wadden Sea system, an area sheltered from the North Sea by a chain of islands, is hypothesized to be defined by a line of no return located alongshore off the coast . The line of no return is conceptually described as an imaginary line beyond which particles escape coastal trapping mechanisms such as density gradient-driven undercurrents .
Map of water depth in the German Bight. Gray lines indicate the ScanFish sampling transects. The inset shows the North Sea and in red the region in the larger drawing. For East and North Frisian subregions, see Fig. .
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Sampling and processing of observational data
Measurements were carried out as part of the “Coastal Observing System for
Northern and Arctic Seas” project
Data processing and sinking velocity extraction
Sinking velocities were obtained by fitting an analytical solution of the
vertical distribution of SPMC to observations. Assuming steady state and
neglecting horizontal advection, the SPM transport equation in time for
concentration reduces to
This describes the balance between fluxes in the positively downward pointing
vertical direction due to sinking and turbulent eddy diffusivity
. If we assume that the sinking timescale is larger than the
tidal period, we can simplify Eq. () by
using the vertically averaged of a profile. This assumes a
rather homogeneous turbulence intensity which we account for in the data
processing described below. If we further allow fluxes across profiles
borders, which cancel out under steady state, we can derive an analytical
model () for depth-dependent SPMC:
Here, represents the profile height and , where
is the depth at which the profile starts. The application of the
analytical solution to observed SPMC profiles requires information on
corresponding values. These and energy dissipation rate
and water density were obtained from
hydrodynamical simulations of , based on a 1 nmi
numerical model of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. In the vertical, 42
terrain-following levels were used. Vertical mixing was parametrized by means
of a two-equation turbulence model coupled to an algebraic
second-moment closure . The implementation of the
turbulence module was done via the General Ocean Turbulence Model
Hydrodynamic model results for , and were linearly interpolated in space and time to extract a corresponding value for every measured data point. Even though state-of-the-art hydrodynamical models generally perform very well, they may locally exhibit discrepancies with observations. To discriminate between profile congruency or the lack thereof, both observed and modeled were interpolated on a common vertical grid of and filtered by applying a least-square straight line fit to the data and a “natural” cubic spline interpolant. The latter had a weight of 80 % to produce a smooth interpolation curve . Subtracting the respective vertical mean resulted in profiles for both observed and modeled data. We further constrained our analysis to casts that satisfy two criteria. First, after the subtraction of modeled from observed data, the standard deviation should not exceed . Second, the density gradients defined as , where represents the mean of a variable and specifically, in this case, the vertical mean, should not exceed a difference of between observed and modeled data. Both limits for and were applied to select similar vertically structured observed and modeled density profiles. The chosen values, however, were somewhat arbitrary and therefore considered in a Monte Carlo-type sensitivity simulation (see below).
ScanFish cruises covered well-mixed coastal but partly also stratified waters in the inner German Bight. A consistent approach to retrieve was required to meet both conditions. When needed, we chose to split casts into subprofiles and to fit the single analytical solution, Eq. (), to (sub-) profiles. If observed , the whole profile was used for fitting, otherwise the cast was split. Since the critical value was set by visual inspection, sensitivity of this critical value was also considered in the Monte Carlo-type simulation described below. Strong gradients in are typically considered to indicate dampening of turbulent mixing. The squared buoyancy frequency () where denotes the gravitational acceleration constant, is related to the vertical eddy diffusivity by : with the current standard value for . A strong vertical sea water density gradient thus reflects low turbulent diffusion, which would imply spliting profiles in stratified waters at the maximum density gradient(s). However, as recently discussed by , mixed layer depths defined by density gradients are a rather inadequate proxy for turbulence intensity. Since particle properties such as size and density are a function of shear rate and SPM components, it is reasonable to expect them to differ with vertical turbulence intensity, thus leading to different sinking velocities. For example, reported vertically varying mean aggregate sizes for the Baltic Sea. While we generally expect vertical gradients in SPMC, strong vertical gradients in SPMC potentially reflect weak mixing and are thus a possible indication for changes in turbulence intensities. The co-occurrence of strong gradients in and SPMC can thus signal changes in turbulence intensity and particle property. Splitting at these points allowed us to apply the analytical SPMC model (Eq. ), where we assumed a rather homogeneous turbulent diffusion by using the vertically averaged . Thus, end points of subprofiles were set, where regions in the profile with occur and reach their maximum. Here, denotes the vertical average and is the SPMC smoothing spline-interpolated analogously to . Start points of the subprofiles were either the first data point from the surface or where regions defined by Eq. () end with increasing depth. Only subprofiles longer than 4 were considered for further analysis.
Example for the (a) spline-fitted profiles, (b) comparison between observed and modeled spline-fitted , (c–g) the splitting and subsequent fitting of the analytical model to vertical SPMC subprofiles; derived and analytical model errors (Eq. ) are given by the corresponding numbers. (h) Turbulence model-calculated (green) and (magenta) profile. For (a–g) lines in black: raw observations; red: spline fits; magenta: hydrodynamical spline fits; blue dashed line in (f) critical depth-averaged value (right-hand side of Eq. ); green: analytical model fit; red dots: derived split points from Eq. ().
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The analytical model, Eq. (), was fitted to the original observation of each (sub-) profile with data points, and the cost function was calculated accordingly. and represent the variance in concentration of a profile and in a region, respectively. The latter was defined as the variance for measurements around the profile within min to account for higher variability in coastal than in open-water regions found in a pre-analysis of the data. Only profiles below a cost function value of 0.05, chosen by visual inspection, were considered for the analysis. The splitting and subsequent fitting of the analytical model is visualized in Fig. . The variables SPMC and fluorescence-to-SPMC ratio (F SPMC) were vertically averaged for the respective (sub-) profiles. Afterward, variables were binned with respect to modeled and eventually averaged bin-wise, resulting in respective bin-wise ensemble means , , and . To test for significant changes in binned with , we applied a Mann–Whitney test with a significance level of for each binned against each other. In summary, approximately 67 % of the profiles initially measured passed the congruency check with modeled ones. After the application of the cost function threshold, this resulted in about 12 260 values.
All applied threshold values were carefully selected by visual inspection during each filtering step. To quantify their influence on the result, we performed a Monte Carlo-type simulation with a variation of % for the following parameters: , , and the cost function error. The analysis was repeated for variations of all parameters against each other. For each parameter variation, binned mean values for vs. were calculated and are then averaged and their standard deviation quantified (see Fig. c).
Conceptual cross-coastal sinking velocity model
We introduce and apply a conceptual model for the cross-shore variation of as a tool to interpret our results. According to , of a particle of diameter can be described by where is the dynamic viscosity, is the water density and the gravitational acceleration constant. The floc density is strongly related to the particles' composition and structure. The latter can be described as fractal dimension according to , who derived the excess floc density for a particle composed of primary particles of diameter and density : Following the approach of and assuming equally sized primary particles of diameter , derived the excess floc density for an aggregate composed of mineral and organic particles with density and , respectively: For of an aggregate, it follows where and and are the number of mineral and organic primary particles, respectively.
This simple model, Eq. (), allows the calculation of trends in on a cross-shore transect. Based on observations, we presume the general following parameter changes from coastal to open waters: (i) average primary particle size and aggregate size increase, (ii) particles become more organic, and (iii) particles become more porous; thus, decreases. Based on a first-order approach, we assume a linear decrease or increase in parameters with distance from coast. For boundary conditions in coastal waters, we therefore assume an average due to the dominance of cohesive sediment , , to account for a loss on ignition (LoI) of and as an average coastal fractal dimension . By contrast, for open waters we presume the following: for algae-dominated particles; since we assume similar trends as in for the Irish Sea; , to parallel a LoI0.89 ; and as a typical value for fluffy aggregates . The densities of primary particles are set to and , which is computed as an average of the range given in . The water density and the dynamic viscosity are set to and , respectively. The sensitivity of to changes in each parameter is assessed by varying each parameter separately while keeping the other parameters at their typical values for coastal waters; e.g., for an organic-rich aggregate with an assumed diameter of and , and .
Map of hydrodynamic model-calculated time- and depth-averaged energy dissipation rate for the times of the cruises.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Results
Cross-coastal gradients
Energy dissipation rates generally possess spatiotemporal variability. Most relevant for this study, vertically and temporally averaged model-derived exhibits a cross-shore gradient from the inner German Bight towards the coast. The temporal averaging is carried out for the time of the cruises while accounting for the length of the tidal cycle. Values range between and (Fig. ).
In this range, mean SPMC first increases from values below 1 to approximately 10 . Above , mean SPMC moderately decreases to approximately 6 and increases again to 10 with a further increase in (Fig. a) towards the coast.
Under the assumption that fluorescence can be applied as a proxy for POM, the potential significance of algae and their products for particle composition is depicted by the mean ratio between measured fluorescence and SPMC. High F SPMC ratios indicate rather organic-rich particles, while low F SPMC ratios indicate rather mineral particle-dominated flocs. The F SPMC ratio shows rather high variability for (Fig. b). With a further increase in , the ratio drops and levels at approximately a fourth of the open German Bight value for .
Average sinking velocities show very low values of the order of 10 to 10 in regions of (Fig. c). At higher , increases significantly reaching a maximum of about around . This maximum around coincides with an increase in SPMC and a drop in fluorescence to SPMC ratio. By further increasing , decreases again to values of . The Monte Carlo-type simulation to estimate parameter uncertainties exhibits the same pattern, expressed as and confidence levels (68 % and 95 %, respectively; Fig. c) around their ensemble mean and thus underpins the results of along .
(a) , (b) ratio and (c) vs. . Gray error bars represent the standard deviation and red error bars represent the confidence intervals () for the averages in each bin. Average values for the bins were used for the color coding. In (c) and represent the confidence levels of 68 and 95 %, respectively, for the Monte Carlo-type parameter variation.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Conceptual model
The sinking velocity of an average particle (as parametrized in Sect. ) changes almost linearly with variations of single parameters from open to coastal waters (Fig. , upper four panels). Flocs would sink less rapidly because of the decreasing diameter of the aggregate or primary particles in the coastal region. By contrast, increasing amounts of mineral particles and fractal dimension would both lead to increased . As an overall effect, when considering all parameters, reaches a maximum in between the nearshore and open waters (lowest panel of Fig. ).
Schematic view of potential influences on sinking velocity (red lines) from open waters (left) to coastal waters (right) and the changing parameters' total impact on the resulting sinking velocity (lowest panel) calculated according to Eq. (). The sinking velocities shown in the upper four panels are based on a particle of , , and , while the respective parameter shown in the panel is varied (blue lines) (constant parameters are , , and ).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Discussion
Sinking velocity on a gradient of prevailing energy dissipation rate
Sinking velocities were determined along a cross-shore transect in the German
Bight defined by the prevailing . For the reconstruction of
, we had to assume congruency between in situ
measurements and hydrodynamic model results within a range defined by the
applied filters. The estimated of the order of
to in low- and
high-energy dissipation regions, respectively (Fig. ), compare very well with previous in situ
studies in the German Bight and adjacent areas. found
to
for the open German Bight, a low- region, and
reported median of to
for the Rømø and Højer Dyb, Danish
Wadden Sea, where is comparably high. Our estimated is also well within the range found in other regions, e.g., in
Chesapeake Bay or at the Belgian coast
. In agreement with previous studies
Scatterplot of and . Error bars represent the confidence intervals () for the averages in each bin. The rather poor correlation can be attributed to the heterogeneity of the German Bight system. See text for discussion.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Sinking velocity as a result of SPMC, composition and a turbulence gradient
Our study additionally suggests a change in particle composition, with
as proxied by the fluorescence-to-SPMC ratio. With ,
SPMC increases towards the coast and the mineral fraction becomes dominant
compared to organic particles at low . Hence,
density and other physicochemical properties of primary particles such as
size and adhesion can change accordingly and thus influence
along a cross-shore transect. Our conceptual model illustrates the effect of
varying particle properties on independent of the observations
used in our data analysis. However, the course of the parameters implicitly
presumes certain environmental conditions, such as particle size being, among
other factors, a function of SPMC and shear. Single-parameter changes in the
conceptual model result in mostly linear responses in , while
considering all parameters leads to a maximum in on the
conceptual cross-shore transect, in agreement with our findings in the data
analysis. The assumption of linearly changing parameters is a first-order
approximation. Different and nonlinear changes in parameters would lead to a
transformation of the maximum sinking velocity zone such as a shifting and/or
stretching (not shown). Previous model studies show that for a given shear
regime, varying particle properties such as particle adhesion can lead to a
change in particle size and thus sinking velocity
Implications of a cross-coastal maximum of sinking velocity for biogeochemical cycling in the coastal zone
The region of with highest coincides with a zone located off the coast at a depth of about 15 to 20 . It is accompanied by a strong gradient in SPMC and SPM composition that is depicted by the F SPMC ratio. This suggests that the region can be considered a transition zone, hindering mineral particles from escaping further offshore. To simplify this, consider the course from the coast to open waters. Once formed, relatively dense fast-sinking flocs, whose properties are adapted to the transition zone turbulence level, would easily settle out of the water column when transported offshore. This is because turbulence becomes too weak to break those aggregates apart and to retain them in suspension. Thus, only loose, organic-rich particles are kept suspended in the water column while mineral-rich particles tend to settle out of the water column. Such trapping is previously described conceptually for other regions, e.g., by and for river plumes. High in the transition zone thus implies an enhanced link between pelagic and near-bottom processes. Among them, different transport mechanisms are discussed in the literature that potentially lead, on average, to a net transport of fine sediments shorewards into the tidal back barriers. Settling lag is caused by the different time durations for particles to sediment in different water depths after the bottom shear stress for erosion falls below the critical stress . Another process is scour lag, which potentially arises from needing lower bottom shear stresses to keep particles in suspension than for their erosion in combination with an asymmetry in the flow . These effects are investigated under different topographical settings , and the authors concluded that in the range of 0.5 and 1 leads to the highest deposition rates and underlined the necessity of fine mineral particle flocculation for the buildup of tidal flat systems. Recently, another potential major driver, the estuarine circulation, has been suggested for sediment accumulation in the Wadden Sea. Residual currents of the estuarine circulation are driven by density gradients that can be caused by (i) horizontal temperature gradients, (ii) differential precipitation, (iii) river discharges and (iv) all possible superpositions. Residual currents of the estuarine circulation flow shorewards in near-bottom waters and offshore in surface waters . This probably causes a net SPM flux into the Wadden Sea . The Wadden Sea is hypothesized to act as bioreactor, where organic components of SPM become remineralized and are exported in dissolved form by the offshore-directed component of the estuarine circulation. Along this pathway, dissolved nutrients are assimilated by phytoplankton and thus transferred to bio particulates. This is likely to happen particularly within the region of prevailing , where phytoplankton experience favorable growth conditions as found by for different places on the northern European continental shelf. Algae exude EPSs like TEPs that can undergo and mediate flocculation by bridging and embedding minerals. The mineral particles ballast the organic matrix and lead to enhanced sinking velocities, as previously described for the deep ocean , which again links pelagic processes to the residual near-bottom currents of the estuarine circulation. In summary, this would imply that the transition zone characterized by its high accompanied with strong SPMC gradients acts as an important off-coastal feature for closing the nearshore nutrient and mineral cycle. Such a biologically mediated trapping mechanism would retain nutrients and minerals in the coastal zone and inside the Wadden Sea back barriers.
Spatial biogeochemical implications of a coastal transition zone
Typically, spatial information on biochemical variables are needed to better understand system-wide cycling and the fate of matter. Unfortunately, averaging of over bins of means a possible loss of direct spatial reference. However, our approach made it possible to identify a general pattern of with a defined maximum along prevailing energy dissipation rates. Even though we neither resolve tidal cycles nor consider potential seasonal variation of along , a map of allows insights into the spatial distribution and variability of . It is reconstructed by mapping the bin-wise relationship found between and (Fig. c) onto the respective spatial (Fig. ). It must be highlighted that local, short-term in situ measurements would most likely deviate from the obtained averaged picture (Fig. ) that would be challenging to derive by in situ measurements. Nevertheless, strong spatial variability is visible with a pronounced cross-shore gradient of featuring a maximum of sinking velocities along the coastline as indicated before. However, this maximum varies locally and is particularly less pronounced at the northern German and southern Danish coast, where declines to values that are in the range of in deeper waters in the southern German Bight. Applying the aforementioned concept of the transition zone as an off-coastal closing mechanism for nutrient cycling to the two contrasting German Wadden sea regions – East Frisian Wadden Sea and North Frisian Wadden Sea (particularly the Sylt–Rømø Bight) – may help to better understand regional differences in nutrient concentrations. Lower nutrient concentrations and thus lower eutrophication levels in the Sylt–Rømø Bight compared to the East Frisian Wadden Sea are regularly observed . In this case, the maximal calculated in front of the Sylt–Rømø tidal inlet amounts only to , about half the magnitude found off the other Wadden Sea regions. Hence, the ability to retain nutrients is diminished and would contribute to the lower nutrient concentrations compared to other Wadden Sea regions. By contrast, the potentially pronounced retention capacity of the transition zone, as predicted for the Dutch coast and German East Frisian islands, may contribute to the phenomenologically described line of no return , expected further off the coast and characterized by low SPMC. The spatial distribution of is probably also reflected in the SPMC and their cross-coastal gradients (Fig. ). Flocs with high are likely mineral-dominated and would rapidly sink out of the water column and thus lead to strong cross-coastal diminishing of SPMC. Generally, dilution of SPMC occurs due to cross-shore wise increasing water depth and local currents parallel to the coast potentially confining horizontal SPMC distribution to the near-coast region . Nevertheless, on average, lower accompanied by lower SPMC and smaller horizontal gradients is found along the North Frisian than along the Dutch and East Frisian coast (Figs. and ). In combination, these conditions, in particular along the Sylt–Rømø islands, suppress the establishing of a defined transition zone. Hence, lower should be found as implied by Fig. . As a result, retention efficiency is likely reduced and potentially contributes to the observed lower nutrient concentrations compared to the East Frisian Wadden Sea .
Map of spatial distribution of in the German Bight. Results for from Fig. were mapped onto the modeled shown in Fig. to provide spatial information on potentially prevailing . Areas of water depth smaller than are not considered.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Top: MERIS-derived temporally averaged SPMC in the German Bight. Averaging of available MERIS scenes was carried out for the times of the cruises. Regions of water depths smaller than 5 were whited out. Bottom: pixel-wise gradients of SPMC calculated by , where and are east–west and south–north pixel directions, respectively. A Wiener filter of three by three pixels was subsequently applied. Notice the stronger gradients along the Dutch and East Frisian coastline compared to the North Frisian coast with the Sylt–Rømø Bight at 55 N. For regions, see also Fig. .
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Other concepts are presented to explain the observed spatial heterogeneity of eutrophication levels along the Wadden Sea coast. These explanations are categorized into two main groups by : either according to (i) regional differences in organic matter import or (ii) differences in the size of the tidal basins. Potential differences of the import amount were attributed to different (i) regional offshore primary production, (ii) orientation of the coastline with respect to dominant wave and current directions, and (iii) intensity of shoreward bottom currents. The eutrophication status can be related to the tidal basin width, where narrow tidal basins have a higher eutrophication status than wider ones . While the general buildup of nutrient gradients towards the coast is attributed to the above discussed processes of settling and scour lag in combination with the estuarine circulation, no clear mechanistic explanation is given as to why the size of the tidal basins lead to the relation found. suggested that POM imported into the tidal basins would be either distributed over a larger area for wide basins, which would lead to gentle nutrient gradients compared to steeper nutrient gradients in narrower basins. However, other explanations cannot be ruled out, e.g., those linked to differences in water exchange times . It is likely that a multitude of processes interact, and detailed modeling studies are required to disentangle their relative contributions to the observed spatial heterogeneity of the Wadden Sea eutrophication status. Noticeably, the Sylt basin exhibits exceptionally low eutrophication status in the study of , which would fit into the picture that the import of POM is reduced due to the rather weakly established transition zone in this area.
Since the driving mechanisms behind the transition zone are probably ubiquitous for coastal marine systems with sufficiently strong cross-shore water density gradients generated by freshwater runoff, precipitation–evaporation balance or heat fluxes, local hydrodynamics will determine its eventual formation. This implies that the concept of the transition zone with its retention capacity for nutrients may be applicable to other coastal marine and estuarine systems in general and will help to better understand different nutrient cycling behavior among those systems.
Biological modulation of the transition zone?
There is increasing evidence that sticky algae excretions such as transparent exopolymer particles mediate aggregation and increase shear resistance of particles to fragmentation, potentially enabling algae to clear the water column from mineral load . As shown in the conceptual model (Sect. ), high occurs due to the interplay of shear-driven flocculation and primary particle density and size. Similarly, found a nonlinear effect of the ratio of mineral–organic weight to weight content on sinking velocity showing first an increasing for increasing mineral load but a stagnation or even converse effect when exceeding a certain threshold. To hypothesize, a high concentration of SPM with an optimal ratio between dense mineral and sticky bio particles might exist in the transition zone under favorable turbulent conditions to form larger flocs compared to near-coast regions and denser flocs compared to open waters. In sum, this could lead to the high found. This raises the important question as to what extent algae can affect the transition zone and its seasonal location to sustain the effective coastal nutrient cycle that is driven by the estuarine circulation. By sustaining the nutrient cycle, algae potentially support the development of the pronounced nutrient gradients towards the Wadden Sea. As a consequence, 3-D biogeochemical models require a representation of the tight coupling between sediment dynamics and biogeochemical, potentially even adaptive phytoplankton physiological processes to improve models' capability to estimate particulate matter fluxes.
Conclusions
The present study provides a strong indication of a maximum of sinking velocities along a cross-shore transect that is defined by a gradient of prevailing energy dissipation rates. Towards the offshore areas, the enhanced sinking velocities are accompanied by a strong decline in SPMC and an increasing F SPMC ratio. The interplay of processes leading to the observed features defines the region as a coastal transition zone. In turn, processes feed back to SPMC and composition.
The transition zone is probably an important feature on the course from the coast to the continental shelf. Predominantly driven by turbulent shear generated by energy dissipation, the transition zone with the highest sinking velocities potentially acts as a retention zone for dissolved nutrients leaking from nearshore waters by providing favorable conditions for algae growth. Phytoplankton take up nutrients and excrete EPSs that mediate flocculation processes. Embedding minerals in the organic matrix leads to enhanced sinking velocities. Algae thus seem to possess the ability to clear the water column and link the offshore dissolved nutrient fluxes to residual landward bottom fluxes. Consequently, these interlinked processes would have the potential to retain fine sediments and nutrients in coastal areas. The strength of the links eventually affects the eutrophication state of the coastal region.
It is scarcely understood what relevance individual processes have in forming the transition zone. Besides favoring energy dissipation rates of about , algae and their extracellular polymeric excretions are potentially important in forming the transition zone as EPSs are known to enhance collision efficiency and resistance to fragmentation. Since primary production in the studied area features a pronounced seasonal cycle, further studies are thus needed to investigate the temporal and spatial extension of the transition zone. Long-term or repeated spatial in situ measurements, including SPMC, profiles and particle properties such as size, and (volume) composition, are required to underpin the enhanced sinking velocities found indirectly as a feature of the transition zone. Additionally, modeling approaches are required to gain a deeper process-based understanding and to disentangle the closely linked processes among other eutrophication-state-affecting environmental factors. This also implies the necessity of incorporating biological–mineral interactions in models, especially when system-wide studies are carried out.
Data availability
Observational and model data and related material are available for scientific use upon request to the corresponding author.
Data are in the process of being made publicly available via the COSYNA data
management portal CODM:
Richard Riethmüller planned and carried out the ScanFish measurements in the German Bight and took responsibility to ensure data quality. Eefke M. van der Lee conducted an intensive pre-analysis of the data. Ulf Gräwe provided hydrodynamical model results from GETM for the times of the cruises. Richard Hofmeister interpolated the 3-D GETM results to the ScanFish track. Joeran Maerz and Kai W. Wirtz discussed and outlined the general research approach. Joeran Maerz carried out the data analyses and prepared the manuscript. All coauthors contributed critically to the discussion and to the interpretation of the results and the compilation of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the crew of the research vessel R/V Heincke, H. Rink, H. Thomas, M. Heineke and R. Kopetzky for operating the ScanFish and for the processing and quality assurance of the observational data and laboratory work, and we thank L. Merckelbach and G. Flöser for fruitful discussions. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers, who helped to improve our manuscript. This work was supported (i) by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education in the framework of the projects PACE (The future of the Wadden Sea sediment fluxes: still keeping pace with sea level rise?, FKZ 030634A) and MOSSCO (Modular System for Shelves and Coasts, FKZ 03F0667A), (ii) by the Helmholtz society via the program PACES, and (iii) by the Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK) and the Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Umwelt und Klimaschutz (MUK) in the framework of the WiMo project (Scientific monitoring concepts for the German Bight), and through the Coastal Observing System for Northern and Arctic Seas (COSYNA). The financing of further developments of the IOW's Baltic Monitoring Program and adaptations of numerical models (STB-MODAT) by the federal state government of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is acknowledged by Ulf Gräwe. Supercomputing was provided by the North-German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN). The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by a Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association. Edited by: K. Juniper Reviewed by: three anonymous referees
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Marine coastal ecosystem functioning is crucially linked to the transport and fate of suspended particulate matter (SPM). Transport of SPM is controlled by, amongst other factors, sinking velocity
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht (HZG), Geesthacht, Germany; present address: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), Hamburg, Germany
2 Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht (HZG), Geesthacht, Germany
3 Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany; Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Leibniz University Hanover, Hanover, Germany