Introduction
Ozone (O) and its photochemical derivative, OH, are primary oxidants and key players determining oxidation capacity within the troposphere (e.g., Berchet et al., 2013; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). A short-lived greenhouse gas, O also affects climate change and air quality (e.g., Berchet et al., 2013; Brasseur et al., 1999; IPCC, 2013; Jacobson, 2012). Exposure to high O levels is known to increase human mortality rates (Bell and Dominici, 2008; Chang et al., 2010), reduce agricultural yields, and damage natural ecosystems (e.g., Bell et al., 2011; Karnosky et al., 2007; Schaub et al., 2005; Wang and Mauzerall, 2004). Tropospheric O is primarily transported from the stratosphere upon tropopause folding and produced by in situ photochemical reactions involving carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons in the presence of nitrogen oxides (NO) (Brasseur et al., 1999). Ozone is also lost by photochemical reactions and deposition to the Earth's surface. As a result, the lifetime of O ranges from about a week in summer to several months in winter, which permits O, along with other pollutants, to be transported over long distances. In previous studies, ozone levels were observed to be enhanced episodically in polluted air masses from continental outflow in remote regions of the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans (e.g., Fischer et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Parrish et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2008).
Geographical locations of (a) Ieodo Ocean Research Station, (b) Gosan, Korea, (c) Ryori, (d) Yonagunijima, and (e) Minamitorishima, Japan.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Particularly, east Asia has experienced a rapid development in economy and industry, from which emissions of O precursors such as NO and VOCs have gradually increased (Huang et al., 2013; Monks et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2013) and the emission of O and its precursors in east Asia is expected to increase further in the near future (Zhao et al., 2013; Ohara et al., 2007). As a result, the study region became a hot spot for high O and intensive measurements have been performed there to chart O and the effects it has in conjunction with climate change. Over the North Pacific Ocean, ozone has been measured on remote islands (Kato et al., 2001; Parrish et al., 2012; Tanimoto et al., 2009; Wada et al., 2011), from ships (Ridder et al., 2012; Watanabe et al., 2005) and by aircraft (Dupont et al., 2012; Kotchenruther et al., 2001; Walker et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2008).
The impact of continental outflow upon background O is substantial in northeast Asia (Akimoto et al., 1996; Kondo et al., 2008; Tanimoto et al., 2008; Wada et al., 2011; Yamaji et al., 2006). This impact has similarly been detected near the western US (Fischer et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Parrish et al., 2009). Walker et al. (2010) estimated that Asian anthropogenic outflow and lightning-derived NO emissions contributed at least 7.2 and 3.5 ppbv to O concentration, respectively, in the North Pacific Ocean and western North America. In addition, Zhang et al. (2008) assessed that O in western North America was increased by Asian outflow 5–7 ppbv during spring 2006. The results of these studies indicate O concentrations in the North Pacific Rim are regularly affected by Asian outflow. Therefore, it is critical to understand the impact of continental outflows from east Asia on O and oxidizing power over the North Pacific Ocean. Since IORS is located in the East China Sea (32.07 N, 125.10 E) (Fig. 1) and almost equidistant from nearby South Korea, China, and Japan, it is an ideal place to observe Asian outflows without local effects (Hwang et al., 2008; Shin et al., 2007). In this study, we present long-term measurements of O at IORS, located in the boundary zone between the Yellow and East China Sea. Then, we describe their characteristic variations and evaluate the continental influence on the regional background concentrations of O.
Methodology
Ieodo Ocean Research Station is an unmanned research tower ( 40 m a.s.l.) for atmospheric and oceanographic observations. It was built on rock 36 m below sea level by the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) in 2003 (Moon et al., 2010; Shim et al., 2004). O has been measured at IORS since June 2003. In addition, meteorological parameters have been monitored, which include air pressure, air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction, and visibility. O was measured by an UV photometric analyzer (49C, Thermo Inc., USA) using the absorption of UV radiation at 253.7 nm by O molecules. The analyzer was installed in a dry lab of the main deck, which is 29 m a.s.l. Ambient air was pulled underneath the main deck through a 7 m PFA tubing (6 mm outer diameter). The detection limit of the instrument was 1.0 ppbv. Calibration was done about once every 2 months with an internal ozonator. In addition, the ozone analyzer was inter-compared with an identical instrument, which was calibrated against the primary standard. The two instruments were run side by side using a common inlet. The correlation coefficient of the two measurements was 0.99 in the range between 10 and 90 ppbv and ambient measurements were scaled using the relationship between the two.
The data logger stored 10 min averages. There were power failures and system malfunction at IORS when it was hit by typhoon several times. Thus, raw data were first filtered manually and then the measurements bigger and smaller than 2 (standard deviation) of the average for 10 neighboring values were eliminated. This method is widely used to remove local effects for long-term period measurement (Cvitaš et al., 2004). Statistical analysis was conducted using R (v.3.0.1) (R Core Team, 2014).
Backward trajectories arriving at 100 and 1500 m a.s.l. were calculated for
40 h every 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 24:00 UTC (03:00, 09:00, 18:00, and 21:00 local time) using the
NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model (version 4) (Draxler and Rolph, 2003,
Ozone variations
The mean concentration of 10 min O measurements was 52 ppbv with a maximum of 128 ppbv. The variation of monthly means is presented for 8 years, from June 2003 to December 2010 (Fig. 2), during which O increased 2.8 % year until 2009 and slightly decreased afterwards. The long-term trend of O at IORS is consistent with recent findings of slowdown in the increase of O concentrations observed in Japanese background stations at Mt. Happo and others (Parrish et al., 2012). This hemispheric baseline likely affects O distributions at IORS. Additionally, the vertical column density of tropospheric NO was reported to be decreased over east Asia in 2009, as observed by satellites GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY (Itahashi et al., 2014). In the same context, emissions of NO sharply increased in east Asia after 2000 mostly from China, but then slowed down in 2009 (Tanimoto et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2013). Gu et al. (2013) pointed out that the stagnation of NO emissions in 2009 was associated with an economic recession in China.
Monthly mean O concentrations at IORS, from June 2003 to December 2010, with smoothed trend (thick line) and estimated 95 % confidence interval (gray shading).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The O concentrations of IORS were compared with those of other remote
sites in east Asia and the North Pacific for the same period: Gosan in Korea
(National Institute of Environmental Research), and Ryori, Yonagunijima, and
Minamitorishima in Japan (World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases, WDCGG;
Comparison of diurnal and seasonal variations of O concentrations at remote sites in the northwest Pacific region including IORS, Gosan, Yonagunijima, Ryori, and Minamitorishima. All data were averaged for 8 years (2003–2010) and seasons were divided into spring (May–April), dry summer (May–June), wet summer (July–August), fall (September–November), and winter (December–February). (a) Diurnal variations of O at IORS in different seasons, (b) diurnal variations of O at five sites, and (c) monthly variations of O at five sites.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
(a) Monthly variations of O presented with median, interquartile range (IQR), 1.5 IQR, and outliers, and (b) monthly distributions of temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and visibility at IORS.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
At IORS, the monthly averaged O concentrations were the highest in April and October (62 ppbv) and lowest in August (37 ppbv) (Fig. 3c). The O concentrations remained high during March–May, resulting in a broad spring peak which was in contrast to a sharp fall peak. This is in accordance with a typical pattern that has been observed in other remote sites over northeast Asia during the past decades (Chan et al., 2002; Jaffe et al., 1996; Kanaya et al., 2015; Kondo et al., 2008; Oltmans and Levy II, 1994; Tanimoto et al., 2005, 2009; Watanabe et al., 2005; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2004). In particular, the second peak of O was the most noticeable at IORS along with Gosan in October, which was also observed in previous studies (Kanaya et al., 2015; Tanimoto et al., 2005). It is also noteworthy that outlier levels were the highest and the maximum concentration (128 ppbv) was observed in July (Fig. 4a). In summer, the study region is under the influence of the Asian monsoon system which brings moist air from the Pacific Ocean. Meteorological parameters, including relative humidity, wind speed, and visibility, indicate a clear shift in air mass from pre-monsoon to monsoon season (Fig. 4b). At IORS, O concentration was noticeably decreased during summer, even though the temperature was high. Likewise, the O level at Gosan was at a minimum in summer, when the levels of precursors were the lowest with heavy rainfall. To examine seasonal characteristics of O distributions, all measured species were divided into five seasons: March–April, May–June (pre-monsoon period), July–August, September–November, and December–February. The seasonal wind patterns are presented in Fig. 5.
The left panel for contour maps presenting NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis wind speed in color and wind vector at 850 mb in east Asia from 2004 to 2010 and the right panel for wind roses measured at IORS during (a) March–April, (b) May–June, (c) July–August, (d) September–November, and (e) December–February.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Frequency distributions of 10 min averaged O concentrations at IORS for (a) all data, (b) spring, (c) dry summer, (d) wet summer, (e) fall, and (f) winter with mode concentrations given.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
All O measurements showed bimodal distribution, with a little shoulder on the larger peak (Fig. 6a). In seasonal distributions, the smaller peak (25 ppbv) was the main mode of the summer monsoon season. As shown in Fig. 5, southerly winds were dominant during July–August (82 %) under the influence of North Pacific High. This pattern reveals that the decrease in O was associated with the aged marine air masses brought by the North Pacific High or tropical cyclones (Fig. 5c). In addition to aged air masses, precipitation had scavenged O precursors, possibly leading to lowered O concentrations (Hou et al., 2015). It was also observed that O was decreased in Beijing and Shanghai during the summer monsoon season (Safieddine et al., 2013). In May–June, the mode concentration was the highest at 65 ppbv with the least frequency (Fig. 6c). It is a transition period from continental air mass to oceanic air mass and, as a result, the stagnant conditions which had developed under high temperatures without prevailing wind (Fig. 5b), led to elevated O concentrations. The mode concentration was the second highest (59 ppbv) in spring, which is characterized by the most effective transport of Chinese outflow by the passage of frontal system (Hou et al., 2014; Kondo et al., 2008; Lim et al., 2012). The mode frequency was the greatest in winter, which was due to prevailing northerly winds accounting for 87 % of that period. The main mode of winter and fall, and the second mode of summer monsoon season displayed similar concentrations, which comprised the primary mode of O distributions observed at IORS. O levels are known to exhibit lower variability at remote sites and rural areas (McKendry et al., 2014; Oltmans and Levy II, 1994). However, the results of this study challenge those of previous studies. O concentrations of IORS were highly dependent on air masses, upon which anthropogenic influence was highly variable. This finding emphasizes the significant role of continental outflows in determining O concentrations in the northeast Asian region.
Source signatures of O
Cluster analysis of air mass trajectories
Trajectories were divided into several groups using an agglomerative and hierarchical clustering algorithm with an average linkage function. Average linkage minimizes the within-cluster variance while maximizing between-cluster variance and has been identified as an effective method for categorizing different synoptic situations (Kalkstein et al., 1987). Within a cluster, the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of each trajectory from the cluster center was quantified and then summed to give the total root mean square deviation (TRMSD) (Cape et al., 2000). As a result, six trajectories were identified. The cluster analysis was performed using the Openair package in R (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012, 2014). The distance matrix was calculated by the Euclidean distance.
Mean trajectories of air masses classified into six groups. Air masses of 1500 m altitude were traced backward for 40 h.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The averaged backward trajectories of each cluster are presented in a map (Fig. 7). Among the six clusters, W was the most dominant (23.0 %), followed by NW1 (19.9 %), N (17.9 %), SE (16.6 %), SW (13.4 %), and NW2 (9.2 %). The average O concentration was the highest for N (60 ppbv) and lowest for SE (40 ppbv). For the four clusters of continental air masses, the mean O concentrations were similar to the mean (52 ppbv) of the entire measurement set. In contrast, the marine air masses of SE and SW were characterized by low O concentrations, particularly during summer (32 ppbv).
Source signature by CWT (concentration weighted trajectory) analysis
The CWT (concentration weighted trajectory) method was employed to figure out the potential source of O observed at IORS. The concentration of O for each grid cell was calculated using the following equation (Carslaw, 2013): where and indicate the indices of grid, shows the entire number of backward trajectories, represents the index of trajectory, signifies the concentration of O observed upon arrival of trajectory , and is the residence time of trajectory in the grid cell () (Carslaw, 2013; Cheng et al., 2013). In Fig. 8, the average O concentrations were presented over each grid cell. The O concentration was notably higher for NW1 when air mass passed through the Beijing region. The trajectory of NW2 was similar to that of NW1 except for vertical movement, which is typical for air masses laden with Asian dusts (e.g., Kang et al., 2013).
Concentration weighted trajectory (CWT) analysis of O concentrations (ppbv).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Because the trajectory length is inversely proportional to the residence time of air in a grid cell, the clusters N and W represent stagnant conditions, which was favorable for O to build up. These two trajectories were constantly observed through the year with relatively less seasonal variation at IORS (Fig. 9b). Although the air masses of SW and SE originated from the Pacific Ocean, they were likely to pick urban emissions up when passing through southeastern China and south Japan, respectively. The result of CWT analysis confirms that the outflows from nearby lands were the source of O observed at IORS, of which the Chinese influence was the most dominant.
Influence of Asian continental outflows
For all clusters, the monthly variations of O concentrations were compared (Fig. 9a). In general, six clusters were similar in their annual pattern of O, with higher concentrations in spring and fall and lower concentrations in summer. In contrast, for NW1, which passes through the Beijing metro area, O concentrations stayed high over 60 ppbv during July–August without considerable decrease (Fig. 9a). Although the summer concentrations in SE were low, below 30 ppbv, in spring and fall the O concentrations were high and comparable to those of NW1.
Monthly variations of (a) O concentrations of six clusters and (b) their monthly frequency.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The influence of Chinese outflows, represented by NW1, NW2, and W, was highest in winter, with a maximum occurrence (86 %) in December. The study region is under the influence of the Asian monsoon and is characterized by winds – southerly in summer and northerly in winter. The occurrence of maritime air, SE and SW, was the most frequent in summer monsoon season. The westerlies prevalent in this region are coupled with the steady occurrence of W through the year, implying a constant influence of Chinese outflows. The cluster N was commonly observed before and after the summer monsoon season, during which a stagnant condition often developed under the influence of migratory anticyclone systems. The stagnation tends to linger over the Yellow Sea, accumulating pollutants from nearby lands including China and Japan, as well as Korea. In fact, the high concentrations of O turned out to be associated with air trajectories from Chinese coastal regions. The model results of Zhao et al. (2009) also showed that the high concentration of O can be expanded under a high pressure system in east Asia.
Annual variations of (a) O concentrations for six clusters and (b) their frequency.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The annual variation of each cluster was examined (Fig. 10a). As the O measurement began in June 2003, the measurements of 2003 were not included in this analysis. The yearly O concentrations increased from 49 ppbv in 2004 to 55 ppbv in 2009 and then decreased to 49 ppbv in 2010 (Fig. 2). This pattern was not reflected in NW1 and NW2, for which annual means were the highest in 2004 and lowest in 2010. Marine air masses, including SE and SW, showed the most visible change during this period. Particularly, their annual frequencies increased in 2010, while those of clusters W, N, NW1 decreased (Fig. 10b). These results imply that marine air masses were likely to play a significant role in decreasing O concentration in 2010. The causes underlying increased occurrence of marine air masses need to be investigated further. These results suggest that a decrease in O concentrations after 2009 was not only associated with the decrease in NO emission from China, but also a change in meteorological state in the study region.
Considering that Chinese influence is implicit in N and SW, Chinese emission was the predominant factor determining the concentrations of O at IORS. The impact of Korean and Japanese emissions was incorporated in N and SE, apparent in spring and fall, respectively.
Conclusion
Surface O concentrations were determined at Ieodo Ocean Research Station (IORS) in the East China Sea (32.07 N, 125.10 E) from June 2003 to December 2010. The IORS is a 40 m research tower roughly equidistant from Korean, Chinese, and Japanese shores. The average concentration of O for the entire period was of 52 16 ppbv. It is higher than those of remote sites in northeast Asia and implies the steady influence of continental outflows. Particularly, the seasonal differences were prominent, with two peaks in April and October (62 ppbv) and a minimum in August (37 ppbv), which are greatly dependent on synoptic-scale circulation of the atmosphere which, except for summer, expedites effective transport of Asian outflows into the northwest Pacific region. The diurnal variation of O showed a broad maximum in late afternoon, resulting in 5 ppbv of daytime build-up.
The cluster analysis of backward trajectories identified the six air masses affecting O concentrations at IORS. Among the six, four types of air masses originated from Asian continents, carrying their outflows (NW1, NW2, W, and N), and the other two were aged marine air from the Pacific Ocean (SE, SW). The O concentration of these continental and marine air masses was at a maximum (62 ppbv) in spring and at a minimum (32 ppbv) in summer, respectively. Particularly, the three clusters of NW1, NW2, and W, coming directly from mainland China, comprised 53 % of all air masses which arrived at IORS, their contribution increasing up to 86 % in winter. The clusters N and W were the most frequent under stagnant conditions before and after the summer monsoon. In summer, the occurrence of marine air reached the maximum ( 74 %). These results confirm that Chinese emissions were the dominant source of O observed at IORS.
The annual O concentrations increased until 2009, and then slightly decreased in 2010, which is in good accordance with NO observed in east Asia, where a slowdown of NO emission occurred in 2009 as a result of economic recession in China. In addition, the cluster analysis of air masses highlighted that the increased contribution of marine air masses also played a role in decreasing the mean concentration of O in 2010.
Acknowledgements
This research was a part of the project titled “Construction of Ocean Research Stations and their Application Studies” funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea. We thank the people who contributed to establish IORS and who participated in field measurements. A part of this study was done for the Master's thesis of Beomcheol Shin. Edited by: A. Perring
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Ieodo Ocean Research Station (IORS), a research tower (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
2 Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea; Environmental Meteorology Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Jeju, South Korea
3 Coastal Disaster Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan, South Korea
4 Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, South Korea
5 Korea Environment Institute, Sejong, South Korea