It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy (RS) is an emerging analytical technique that can be used to develop and deploy precision agriculture. RS allows for confirmatory diagnostic of biotic and abiotic stresses on plants. Specifically, RS can be used for Huanglongbing (HLB) diagnostics on both orange and grapefruit trees, as well as detection and identification of various fungal and viral diseases. The questions that remain to be answered is how early can RS detect and identify the disease and whether RS is more sensitive than qPCR, the “golden standard” in pathogen diagnostics? Using RS and HLB as case study, we monitored healthy (qPCR-negative) in-field grown citrus trees and compared their spectra to the spectra collected from healthy orange and grapefruit trees grown in a greenhouse with restricted insect access and confirmed as HLB free by qPCR. Our result indicated that RS was capable of early prediction of HLB and that nearly all in-field qPCR-negative plants were infected by the disease. Using advanced multivariate statistical analysis, we also showed that qPCR-negative plants exhibited HLB-specific spectral characteristics that can be distinguished from unrelated nutrition deficit characteristics. These results demonstrate that RS is capable of much more sensitive diagnostics of HLB compared to qPCR.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Texas A&M University, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, College Station, United States (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
2 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Weslaco, Texas, United States (GRID:grid.264756.4); Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stillwater, United States (GRID:grid.463419.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0946 3608)
3 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Weslaco, Texas, United States (GRID:grid.463419.d); Texas A&M University, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, College Station, United States (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
4 Texas A&M University, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, College Station, United States (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082); Texas A&M University, The Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, College Station, United States (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)




