Adhesin genes and biofilm formation among pediatric Staphylococcus aureus isolates from implant-associated infections

Abstract

Background

Microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) facilitate Staphylococcus aureus adherence to host tissue. We hypothesized that S. aureus isolates from implant-associated infections (IAIs) would differ in MSCRAMM profile and biofilm formation in vitro compared to skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) isolates.

Methods

Pediatric patients and their isolates were identified retrospectively. IAI and SSTI isolates were matched (1:4). Pulsed field gel electrophoresis was performed to group isolates as USA300 vs. non-USA300. Whole genome sequencing was performed and raw sequence data were interrogated for presence of MSCRAMMs (clfA, clfB, cna, ebh, efb, fnbpA, fnbpB, isdA, isdB, sdrC, sdrD, sdrE), biofilm-associated (icaA,D,B,C), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (lukSF-PV) genes, accessory gene regulator group, and multilocus sequence types. In vitro biofilm formation was assessed for 47 IAI and 47 SSTI isolates using a microtiter plate assay. Conditional logistic regression was performed for analysis of matched data (STATA11, College Station, TX).

Results

Forty-seven IAI and 188 SSTI isolates were studied. IAI isolates were more often methicillin susceptible S. aureus and non-USA300 vs. SSTI isolates [34 (72%) vs. 79 (42%), p = 0.001 and 38 (81%) vs. 57 (30%) p <0.001, respectively]. Greater than 98% of isolates carried clfA, clfB, efb, isdA, isdB, and icaA,D,B,C while cna was more frequently found among IAI vs. SSTI isolates (p = 0.003). Most isolates were strong biofilm producers.

Conclusions

S. aureus IAI isolates were significantly more likely to be MSSA and non-USA300 than SSTI isolates. Carriage of MSCRAMMs and biofilm formation did not differ significantly between isolates. Evaluation of genetic polymorphisms and gene expression profiles are needed to further delineate the role of adhesins in the pathogenesis of IAIs.

About the Authors:

Catherine E. Foster

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2657-039X

Melissa Kok

Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-4459

Anthony R. Flores

Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States of America

Charles G. Minard

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-6943

Ruth A. Luna

Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

Linda B. Lamberth

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

Sheldon L. Kaplan

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

Kristina G. Hulten

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a common colonizer of humans and is a ubiquitous pathogen equipped with a diverse assemblage of virulence factors. S. aureus is capable of producing a wide array of infections ranging from minor skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) to potentially life-threatening invasive infections including medical device infections. Associations between S. aureus genotypes and site specific infections or infection severity have been reported [1–6]. Cell-wall anchored proteins are important virulence factors that are involved in many aspects of the infectious process including adhesion, biofilm formation and evasion of innate and adaptive immunity [7]. S. aureus adherence to host-tissue ligands is mediated by a family of adhesins or genetically defined microbial surface proteins referred to as microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) [7]. Over twenty MSCRAMMs have been described, including fibronectin-binding proteins A (FnBpA) and B (FnBpB) which bind to fibronectin, clumping factors A (ClfA) and B (ClfB) which bind to fibrinogen, and collagen adhesin (Cna) which binds to collagen [7–9]. Historically, MSCRAMMs have been defined by their ability to adhere to the extracellular matrix of the host and display a common LPXTG motif through which they are anchored to cell wall peptidoglycan [10, 11]. Many of the host proteins to which MSCRAMMs attach remain unknown and MSCRAMMs frequently have redundant and overlapping functions. MSCRAMMs are speculated to play a role in the pathogenesis of S. aureus implant-associated infections (IAIs) by promoting colonization, invasion, and biofilm formation [7–9].

The ability of S. aureus to form biofilm contributes to the organism’s virulence and is integral to the development of indwelling medical device infections [12]. One of the most well-known mechanisms of biofilm formation is the production of a cell surface polysaccharide, polysaccharide intracellular adhesion (PIA) or poly-N-acetyl B1-6 glucosamine (PNAG), encoded by the icaADBC operon, though several ica-independent mechanisms of biofilm production have also been described [12–14]. Additional mechanisms of biofilm formation can include the release of extracellular DNA (eDNA) from lysed cells and phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) [13–15].

IAIs are a major cause of healthcare-associated infections, including for children, with significant implications for patient morbidity as well substantial economic impacts [16, 17]. S. aureus is a common cause of IAIs, and the most frequent cause of orthopedic implant infections [15]. Data describing the molecular epidemiology of IAIs, however, are lacking, especially in children. It is unclear if S. aureus isolates causing IAIs differ from S. aureus isolates causing less complicated SSTIs in their repertoire of adhesins and biofilm-forming capabilities. A better understanding of the bacterial factors governing pathogenesis of IAIs with a focus on bacterial adherence and biofilm formation may lead to innovations or mechanisms for the prevention of pediatric IAIs.

In this study, we aimed to molecularly characterize the isolates of pediatric patients with S. aureus IAIs seen at Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) using whole genome sequencing (WGS). We hypothesized that S. aureus isolates from IAIs would differ in genotype, MSCRAMM and biofilm gene profiles, and ability to form biofilm in vitro compared to SSTI isolates.

Methods

Population and S. aureus isolates

Patients and isolates were identified retrospectively from an ongoing S. aureus surveillance study database at TCH from January 1, 2008—June 30, 2016. This surveillance study has been in place since August 1, 2001. All S. aureus isolates are stored at -80ºC in the Dr. Edward O. Mason, Jr. Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory [2]. This study was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Pediatric patients (<21 years of age), evaluated at TCH were included if they had an implant or hardware in place and the infection was related to the operative procedure by fulfilling the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/ National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria for a deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (eg involving the fascia and muscle layers) [18]. Patients with superficial incisional SSIs, exit or pin site infections, and patients with an infected tracheostomy, gastrostomy tube, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, or a peritoneal dialysis catheter were excluded. Individual charts were reviewed for operative reports, culture data, histopathology, and imaging. The clinical course and outcomes of patients with S. aureus IAIs were discussed in detail in a previous publication [19].

Patient age and date of isolation matched SSTI control isolates were selected in a 1:4 ratio of case to control isolates from the S. aureus database.

Molecular analysis

Isolates were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in order to group the isolates as USA300 vs nonUSA300 as previously described [2, 20]. Isolates were classified as USA300 if they differed by ≤ 4 bands from a USA300.0114 reference strain (TCH 1516) [21]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine agr type was performed on isolates that were nontypeable by WGS using published primers [1].

Sequencing and data analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated using the MoBio Ultraclean Microbial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). DNA libraries were prepared for WGS using Bioo Scientific NEXTflex Rapid DNA-Sequencing kit (Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. WGS was performed using a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA) platform instrument using 150-bp paired-end sequencing. De novo assembly of the isolates and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using the CLC Genomics Workbench, version 10.1.1 (Qiagen). MLST sequence types were compared using eBurst analysis (www.phyloviz.net). Accessory gene regulator (agr) groups I-IV were assigned for each isolate using agrD [22]. Assembled reads derived from raw WGS data for each isolate were interrogated for the presence of MSCRAMM (clfA, clfB, cna, ebh, efb, fnbpA, fnbpB, isdA, isdB, sdrC, sdrD, sdrE) (Table 1), biofilm-associated (icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) (lukSF-PV) genes using the Microbial Genomics module (version 2.5.1) of CLC Genomics Workbench. Criteria for gene presence was defined by 90% gene identity and a minimum 80% gene length. For surface protein genes with repetitive sequences (clfA, clfB, cna, ebh, sdrC and sdrD), the minimum gene length threshold was adjusted to 60%.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. List of selected Staphylococcus aureus surface proteins and genes studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.t001

Microtiter plate (MTP) biofilm assay and scoring system

In vitro biofilm formation was assessed for 47 IAI isolates and 47 SSTI isolates (the first matched control isolate per IAI) using a microtiter method [23–25]. Bacterial cultures were resuspended in normal saline and the solution diluted to achieve an optical density (OD600) of 0.9–1.1 which is equivalent to 106 colony forming units/ml. The wells of a polystyrene 96-well microtiter plate (Falcon, Corning, NY) were inoculated with 200 μL of bacterial solution + trypticase soy broth with 1% glucose. Following 24-hour incubation at 35ºC the wells were decanted and washed three times using sterile saline phosphate buffer and dried in a hybridization oven for 1 hour at 60ºC. The wells were stained with safranin for 30 minutes and excess stain removed by washing three times with sterile water. The safranin dye bound to adherent cells was dissolved in 200μL ethanol per well and results read at OD490 using a microtiter plate reader (Dynex MRX Revelation). S. aureus RN4220 was used as the positive control and uninoculated media was the negative control. All isolates were tested in quadruplicates and the experiments were done three times. Biofilm formation by isolates was classified according to a modified scoring system. In the scoring system described by Stepanovic et al., biofilm production is quantified by establishing a cutoff OD (ODc) for each microtiter plate, which is defined as the average OD of negative control + 3 x standard deviation (SD) of negative control. Strains are then classified as: a non (OD ≤ ODc), weak (ODc< OD ≤ 2 x ODc), moderate (2 x ODc< OD ≤ 4 x ODc), or strong (4 x ODc< OD ≤ 8 x ODc) producer of biofilm [24]. To further stratify biofilm production, we added a classification of very strong (OD > 8 x ODc) producer.

Statistical analysis

Conditional logistic regression was used for analysis of matched data using STATA11 software (College Station, TX). Two-tailed P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Molecular characterization

Forty-seven IAI and 186 SSTI isolates were compared (two patients were matched at a 1:3 ratio). MLST and agr group (I-IV) assignments are described in Table 2. Most isolates were either ST8 or ST5. The IAI isolates displayed 19 STs without a predominant ST. SSTI isolates were predominately ST8 (68%) and belonged to 39 STs. We identified 16 new sequence types (ST4717-4721 and ST4728-4738), and 14 of these were from SSTI isolates. Overall, the most common agr group was group I (74%) followed by group II (15%); among the IAI isolates, 40% were agr group II.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from implant-associated infection (IAI) isolates and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.t002

Molecular characteristics of the 47 IAI isolates are shown in Fig 1. The majority (34/47, 72%) of IAI isolates were MSSA versus 79/188 (42%) of the SSTI isolates (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.67–6.63, P = 0.001). IAI isolates were also more often non-USA300 (38/47, 81%) compared to SSTI isolates of which 57 (30%) were non-USA300 (OR 11.4, 95%CI 4.67–27.7, P <0.0001). Only 7 (15%) of the IAI isolates carried the pvl genes versus 136 (73%) of the SSTI isolates. Among MRSA isolates, 74% of 120 harbored pvl. In contrast, 26% of 113 MSSA carried the pvl genes.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Color schematic of the forty-seven implant-associated infection (IAI) isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.g001

The frequencies of individual MSCRAMM genes among IAI and SSTI isolates are presented in S1 Table. The majority of genes were present in all isolates with no differences observed relating to the type of infection or methicillin susceptibility. The odds of carrying cna was 3.9 times higher among the IAI versus SSTI isolates (95%CI 1.59–9.63, P = 0.003), although less than 25% of IAI isolates carried the cna gene For the fibronectin binding protein genes fnbpA and fnbpB, no significant differences were observed when comparing IAI to SSTI isolates, although a trend was observed for lesser prevalence of fnbpB among IAI isolates (fnbpA: OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.17–1.35, P = 0.17; fnbpB: OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.18–1.08, = 0.07). The biofilm-associated genes (icaA, icaB, and icaD) were present in all isolates and icaC was present among all IAI and in 99% of SSTI isolates.

Biofilm formation

Biofilm formation was assessed for 47 IAI and 47 SSTI isolates. Nearly all isolates were strong or very strong biofilm producers in vitro (Table 3 and Fig 2). Ten IAI isolates vs 25 SSTI isolates had very strong biofilm formation. Only 3 isolates were moderate biofilm producers and there were no isolates with weak or no biofilm production. All moderate biofilm producing isolates were from IAIs and belonged to agr II group.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. In vitro biofilm production among Staphylococcus aureus implant-associated infection (IAI) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) isolates.

OD, Optical density.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Biofilm formation of pediatric Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 2008–2016.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.t003

Discussion

S. aureus is a pathogen capable of producing a wide spectrum of infections. While the importance of host factors in the infectious process has been widely recognized, the pathogenic potential deriving from the battery of virulence factors of different lineages of the bacterium have also been reported [1–6]. Previous findings among community-onset healthcare-associated (CO HCA) S. aureus infections in children at TCH, found CO HCA-MSSA isolates (24.1% of 357) to be more associated with invasive infections compared to CO HCA-MRSA isolates (8.9% of 542) (P<0.001) [2]. The USA300-ST8-agr1-pvl+ genotype has been the predominant cause of both SSTI and invasive S. aureus infections at our institution, since the early 2000’s. While USA300 is most commonly associated with MRSA, we found a proportion (25–35%) of MSSA to also to be of this genotype [3]. We have identified associations between pvl+ isolates and specific clinical presentations such as complicated pneumonia and venous thrombosis while other presentations, such as bacteremia, were less associated with USA300 or pvl+ [4–6]. In recent years, the number of infections caused by CA-MRSA has decreased as a cause of invasive CA-S. aureus infections and a recent study of invasive CA-MSSA suggested that these infections were caused by genetically diverse strains [3].

S. aureus is a common cause of IAIs, especially spinal implants or orthopedic hardware [15, 16]. To better understand genetic variation of S. aureus isolates causing IAIs in children, we investigated the presence of adhesin and biofilm-formation genes among isolates of pediatric patients with S. aureus IAIs and compared these to matched controls of S. aureus isolated from SSTIs. IAI isolates were more likely to be MSSA (72% versus 42%) and non-USA300 (81% versus 30%) when compared to SSTI isolates. Among IAI isolates only 7 carried pvl and all of the MSSA were pvl- suggesting no relevance of this toxin in implant-associated infections. MSSA is a major cause of S. aureus IAIs in both adult and pediatric patients [26, 27].

S. aureus isolates causing IAIs and SSTIs in children were genetically diverse with 45 STs identified overall. However, most SSTI isolates were ST8 (68%) and agr group I (82%) while, among IAI isolates, ST5 and ST8 were equally common (23% each) and agr group I and agr group II were identified for 45% and 40%, respectively. Five (3%) SSTI isolates were ST121 and agr group IV, a ST associated with scalded skin syndrome and recently identified as increasingly causing disease within our patient population [28]. The notion that no specific genotype was associated with device related infections suggests that the presence of implanted material alone and vulnerability of the host could outweigh differences in the pathogenicity potential between different S. aureus strains. Indeed, previously considered non-pathogenic Staphylococcus species, particularly coagulase-negative staphylococci, are significant pathogens in implant infections [29].

Few studies have investigated the profile of MSCRAMM and biofilm formation genes among S. aureus IAI isolates in children. We found the MSCRAMM encoding genes and the ica-operon to be conserved across diverse genotypes regardless of isolate origin (IAI versus SSTI). Studies of isolates from other sources showed similar findings. Ghasemian et al. used PCR to detect genes encoding select MSCRAMMs using 22 S. aureus isolates from hospitalized children with “systemic infections” in Iran. In their study, all isolates harbored clfA and clfB, while detection of other MSCRAMMs varied from 0–82%; no differences between MRSA and MSSA were detected [30]. McCarthy and Lindsay analyzed 58 whole genome sequences from 15 S. aureus lineages available in the public domain for variations within 25 S. aureus surface proteins. Fifty-four of the sequences were from human isolates (4 were avian, bovine, or porcine) including 17 isolates from an infection. For 26 of the sequences the infection status was publicly unavailable. Eight genes (including fnbpA and isdB) were present in all isolates and 16 genes (including clfA, clfB, fnbpB, isdB, sdrC, and sdrD) were found in nearly all S. aureus genomes [31].This study found that while MSCRAMM genes were present across diverse lineages, domain variants were observed. These variants could be associated with differences in protein expression and folding, which could be important to the organisms’ capacity for adherence to the host cell.

A 2005 study of 191 clinical S. aureus isolates from orthopedic infections, 127 of which were device related, investigated the presence of cna, fnbpA and fnbpB by PCR. This study found cna in only 46% of isolates while nearly all isolates carried fnbpA (98.4%) or fnbpB (99.5%) [32]. The authors concluded that while fibronectin-adhesins appeared to play a critical role in bone and joint implant associated infections, Cna was of lesser importance. In our study, cna was identified from only 23% of IAI isolates and 7.5% of SSTI isolates further questioning the role of Cna in SSTI or IAIs. This finding also reflects that a large number of the IAI isolates in our study were MSSA (only 22% of MSSA harbored cna) and the fact that USA300 isolates lack cna (70% of SSTI were USA300). In our study the majority of cna+ isolates were non-USA300 MSSA.

Overall, we and others have found genes encoding MSCRAMMs to be common across S. aureus isolates of diverse genetic backgrounds regardless of the source. Therefore, other factors, such as the local tissue changes related to the presence of an implant and the patient’s immunocompetence likely play important roles in enabling S. aureus to establish a device associated infection rather than the strain type or specific adhesin(s) and/or virulence determinants.

The in vitro biofilm assay used allowed only for biofilm quantification, without the ability to evaluate the mechanism of biofilm formation and was performed to investigate whether any differences could be discerned between isolates from IAIs vs. SSTIs. We hypothesized that the device related isolates would have greater biofilm production, as this phenomenon would allow for adherence to the material. We found S. aureus isolates from both IAIs and SSTIs were equally strong producers of biofilm suggesting that biofilm production is also important for the establishment of SSTIs. Other studies have found differences between isolates using the same methods and it is possible that we could have observed a broader range of biofilm formation had we included a comparator group of carriage isolates from healthy individuals [14, 30].

There are several limitations to our study. First, the isolates came from a single pediatric institution and the results may not be representative of other geographic areas or populations. As S. aureus IAIs were identified using the S. aureus surveillance database, we cannot provide a measure of overall incidence of IAIs at TCH. Secondly, the mechanisms governing MSCRAMM expression and biofilm formation are highly complex and for this study we focused only on the presence or absence of select adhesin genes. Future analyses using the WGS data will focus on defining MSCRAMM domain variations and allelic variants. Studies of the expression of these molecules could further shed light on their role in device related infections. Finally, we used a previously described in vitro biofilm assay to quantify biofilm production among IAI and SSTI isolates. It is possible that the use of different growth conditions, for example supplementation with glucose vs sodium chloride, or the use of another binding material could have altered the production of biofilm. Furthermore, a comparator group of colonizing isolates from healthy individuals may have provided insights into the role of biofilm formation in colonization versus disease.

In summary, S. aureus IAI isolates were significantly more likely to be MSSA and non-USA300 compared to SSTI isolates. Carriage of specific MSCRAMMs or biofilm-associated genes did not differ significantly between IAI and SSTI S. aureus isolates. While further studies evaluating the complex interactions between MSCRAMMs and biofilm formation in the pathogenesis of S. aureus IAIs are needed, the role of host and technical factors related to the operative implantation of devices remain critically important areas for investigation.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Table. Presence of adhesin genes among implant-associated infection (IAI) isolates and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115.s001

(DOCX)

Citation: Foster CE, Kok M, Flores AR, Minard CG, Luna RA, Lamberth LB, et al. (2020) Adhesin genes and biofilm formation among pediatric Staphylococcus aureus isolates from implant-associated infections. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0235115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235115

References

1. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002;70(2):631–41. pmid:11796592

2. Hulten KG, Kaplan SL, Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Lamberth LB, Versalovic J, et al. Three-year surveillance of community onset health care-associated Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(4):349–53. pmid:16567988

3. Hulten KG, Mason EO, Lamberth LB, Forbes AR, Revell PA, Kaplan SL. Analysis of Invasive Community-Acquired Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections During a Period of Declining Community Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections at a Large Children's Hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(3):235–41. pmid:28859018

4. Bocchini CE, Hulten KG, Mason EO Jr., Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Kaplan SL. Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes are associated with enhanced inflammatory response and local disease in acute hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):433–40. pmid:16452363

5. Gonzalez BE, Hulten KG, Dishop MK, Lamberth LB, Hammerman WA, Mason EO Jr., et al. Pulmonary manifestations in children with invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(5):583–90. pmid:16080077

6. Carrillo-Marquez MA, Hulten KG, Mason EO, Kaplan SL. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related bacteremia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29(5):410–4. pmid:20431380

7. Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Hook M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(1):49–62. pmid:24336184

8. Bartlett AH, Hulten KG. Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis: secretion systems, adhesins, and invasins. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29(9):860–1. pmid:20720472

9. Foster TJ. The remarkably multifunctional fibronectin binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(12):1923–31. pmid:27604831

10. Foster TJ, Hook M. Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6(12):484–8. pmid:10036727

11. Roche FM, Massey R, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Visai L, Speziale P, et al. Characterization of novel LPXTG-containing proteins of Staphylococcus aureus identified from genome sequences. Microbiology. 2003;149(Pt 3):643–54. pmid:12634333

12. McCarthy H, Rudkin JK, Black NS, Gallagher L, O'Neill E, O'Gara JP. Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:1. pmid:25674541

13. Zapotoczna M, O'Neill E, O'Gara JP. Untangling the Diverse and Redundant Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(7):e1005671. pmid:27442433

14. O'Neill E, Pozzi C, Houston P, Smyth D, Humphreys H, Robinson DA, et al. Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(5):1379–88. pmid:17329452

15. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(7):397–409. pmid:29720707

16. Darouiche RO. Device-associated infections: a macroproblem that starts with microadherence. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(9):1567–72. pmid:11577378

17. Tan T, Mithal L. Infections Related to Prosthetic or Artificial Devices. In: Feigin & Cherry's textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2019: 725–743.

18. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309–32. pmid:18538699

19. Foster CE, Lamberth LB, Kaplan SL, Hulten KG. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Implant-associated Infections in Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(8):808–11. pmid:31033905

20. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233–9. pmid:7494007

21. Highlander SK, Hulten KG, Qin X, Jiang H, Yerrapragada S, Mason EO Jr., et al. Subtle genetic changes enhance virulence of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:99. pmid:17986343

22. Robinson DA, Monk AB, Cooper JE, Feil EJ, Enright MC. Evolutionary genetics of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(24):8312–21. pmid:16321935

23. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40(2):175–9. pmid:10699673

24. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I, et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS. 2007;115(8):891–9. pmid:17696944

25. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22(6):996–1006. pmid:3905855

26. Deny A, Loiez C, Deken V, Putman S, Duhamel A, Girard J, et al. Epidemiology of patients with MSSA versus MRSA infections of orthopedic implants: Retrospective study of 115 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):919–23. pmid:27744001

27. Lamberet A, Violas P, Buffet-Bataillon S, Hamel A, Launay E, Lamberet R, et al. Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections in Children: Risk Factors, Characteristics and Outcome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(6):511–3. pmid:29088025

28. Hulten KG, Kok M, King KE, Lamberth LB, Kaplan SL. Increasing Numbers of Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome Cases Caused by ST121 in Houston, Texas. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(1):30–4. pmid:31725120

29. von Eiff C, Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Becker K, Campoccia D. Emerging Staphylococcus species as new pathogens in implant infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2006;29(4):360–7. pmid:16705604

30. Ghasemian A, Najar Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, Mirzaee M. The Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules (MSCRAMMs) Genes among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Hospitalized Children. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10(4):258–64. pmid:26351495

31. McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA. Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:173. pmid:20550675

32. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Gamberini S, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Prevalence of cna, fnbA and fnbB adhesin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopedic infections associated to different types of implant. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;246(1):81–6. pmid:15869965