It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Most published sleep studies use three species: human, house mouse, or Norway rat. The degree to which data from these species captures variability in mammalian sleep remains unclear. To gain insight into mammalian sleep diversity, we examined sleep architecture in the spiny basal murid rodent Acomys cahirinus. First, we used a piezoelectric system validated for Mus musculus to monitor sleep in both species. We also included wild M. musculus to control for alterations generated by laboratory-reared conditions for M. musculus. Using this comparative framework, we found that A. cahirinus, lab M. musculus, and wild M. musculus were primarily nocturnal, but exhibited distinct behavioral patterns. Although the activity of A. cahirinus increased sharply at dark onset, it decreased sharply just two hours later under group and individual housing conditions. To further characterize sleep patterns and sleep-related variables, we set up EEG/EMG and video recordings and found that A. cahirinus sleep significantly more than M. musculus, exhibit nearly three times more REM, and sleep almost exclusively with their eyes open. The observed differences in A. cahirinus sleep architecture raise questions about the evolutionary drivers of sleep behavior.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438); Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
2 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438)
3 University of Kentucky, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438)
4 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438); Signal Solutions LLC, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d)