It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In underdoped cuprates, the interplay of the pseudogap, superconductivity, and charge and spin ordering can give rise to exotic quantum states, including the pair density wave (PDW), in which the superconducting (SC) order parameter is oscillatory in space. However, the evidence for a PDW state remains inconclusive and its broader relevance to cuprate physics is an open question. To test the interlayer frustration, the crucial component of the PDW picture, we perform transport measurements on charge- and spin-stripe-ordered La1.7Eu0.2Sr0.1CuO4 and La1.48Nd0.4Sr0.12CuO4 in perpendicular magnetic fields (H⊥), and also with an additional field applied parallel to CuO2 layers (H∥). We detect several phenomena predicted to arise from the existence of a PDW, including an enhancement of interlayer SC phase coherence with increasing H∥. These data also provide much-needed transport signatures of the PDW in the regime where superconductivity is destroyed by quantum phase fluctuations.
Among the exotic phases in underdoped cuprates, the evidence of a pair density wave (PDW) remains inconclusive. Here, Shi et al. report transport signatures consistent with the presence of PDW pairing correlations that compete with uniform superconductivity in two underdoped cuprate superconductors.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Florida State University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419); Duke University, Department of Physics, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
2 Florida State University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419); Florida State University, Department of Physics, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419); University of Glasgow, James Watt School of Engineering, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X)
3 Florida State University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419)
4 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Kanagawa, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
5 Florida State University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419); Florida State University, Department of Physics, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.255986.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0472 0419)