It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The intriguing functional nature of ceramics containing rare earth sesquioxide (RES) is associated with the type of polymorphic structure they crystallize into. They prefer to be in the cubic, monoclinic or hexagonal structure in the increasing order of cation size, RRE. Since the functional properties of these ceramics varies with RRE, temperature and pressure, a systematic investigation delineating the cation size effect is indispensable. In the present work we report the structural stability and compressibility behaviour of the RES ceramics, (Eu1−xLax)2O3, of RESs with dissimilar structure and significant difference in cationic radii. The selected compositions of (Eu1−xLax)2O3 have been studied using the in-situ high pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction and the structural parameters obtained through Rietveld refinement. The cubic structure, which is stable for 0.95 Å RRE Å at ambient temperature and pressure (ATP), prefers a cubic to hexagonal transition at high pressures. The biphasic region of cubic and monoclinic structure, which is stable for 0.98 Å RRE Å at ATP, prefers a cubic/monoclinic to hexagonal transition at high pressures. Further, in the biphasic region of monoclinic and hexagonal structure, observed for 1.025 Å RRE Å, the monoclinic phase is found to be progressing towards the hexagonal phase with increasing pressure. The pure hexagonal phase obtained for 1.055 Å RRE 1.10 Å is found to be structurally stable at high pressures. The bulk moduli are obtained from the Birch–Murnaghan equation of state fit to the compressibility data and its dependance on the cation size is discussed. The microstrain induced by the difference in cation size causes an internal pressure in the crystal structure leading to a reduction in the bulk modulus of and 0.6. A pressure–concentration (P–x) phase diagram upto a pressure of 25 GPa is constructed for (Eu1−xLax)2O3. This would provide an insight to the fundamental and technological aspects of these materials and the RESs in general.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 HBNI, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, High Pressure Physics Section, Condensed Matter Physics Division, Materials Science Group, Kalpakkam, India (GRID:grid.459621.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 8574)
2 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, High Pressure and Synchrotron Radiation Physics Division, Mumbai, India (GRID:grid.418304.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 4228)