It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Coffee, after petroleum, is the most valuable commodity globally in terms of total value (harvest to coffee cup). Here, our bioeconomic analysis considers the multitude of factors that influence coffee production. The system model used in the analysis incorporates realistic field models based on considerable new field data and models for coffee plant growth and development, the coffee/coffee berry borer (CBB) dynamics in response to coffee berry production and the role of the CBB parasitoids and their interactions in control of CBB. Cultural control of CBB by harvesting, cleanup of abscised fruits, and chemical sprays previously considered are reexamined here to include biopesticides for control of CBB such as entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae) and entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema sp., Heterorhabditis). The bioeconomic analysis estimates the potential of each control tactic singly and in combination for control of CBB. The analysis explains why frequent intensive harvesting of coffee is by far the most effective and economically viable control practice for reducing CBB infestations in Colombia and Brazil.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Bogotá, Colombia (GRID:grid.412208.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2223 8106); Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems Global (Casasglobal.Org), Kensington, USA (GRID:grid.412208.d)
2 University of California, Division of Ecosystem Science, College of Natural Resources, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems Global (Casasglobal.Org), Kensington, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f)
3 Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.5196.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9864 2490); Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems Global (Casasglobal.Org), Kensington, USA (GRID:grid.5196.b)