It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Groundwater provides critical freshwater supply, particularly in dry regions where surface water availability is limited. Climate change impacts on GWS (groundwater storage) could affect the sustainability of freshwater resources. Here, we used a fully-coupled climate model to investigate GWS changes over seven critical aquifers identified as significantly distressed by satellite observations. We assessed the potential climate-driven impacts on GWS changes throughout the 21st century under the business-as-usual scenario (RCP8.5). Results show that the climate-driven impacts on GWS changes do not necessarily reflect the long-term trend in precipitation; instead, the trend may result from enhancement of evapotranspiration, and reduction in snowmelt, which collectively lead to divergent responses of GWS changes across different aquifers. Finally, we compare the climate-driven and anthropogenic pumping impacts. The reduction in GWS is mainly due to the combined impacts of over-pumping and climate effects; however, the contribution of pumping could easily far exceed the natural replenishment.
Climate change may impact groundwater storage and thus the availability of freshwater resources. Here the authors use climate models to examine seven aquifers and find that storage changes are primarily the result of enhancement of evapotranspiration, reduction in snowmelt, and over-pumping rather than long-term precipitation changes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 National Taiwan University, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
2 National Taiwan University, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
3 International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (GRID:grid.75276.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 1955 9478)
4 University of Saskatchewan, School of Environment and Sustainability and Global Institute for Water Security, Saskatoon, Canada (GRID:grid.25152.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 235X)
5 California Institute of Technology, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
6 Monash University Malaysia, School of Engineering, Subang Jaya, Malaysia (GRID:grid.440425.3)
7 Sorbonne Université, CNRS, EPHE, UMR 7619 METIS, Paris, France (GRID:grid.440425.3)
8 The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)