It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Intersections are critical decision points for wayfinders, but it is unknown how decision dynamics unfold during pedestrian wayfinding. Some research implies that pedestrians leverage available visual cues to actively compare options while in an intersection, whereas other research suggests that people strive to make decisions long before overt responses are required. Two experiments examined these possibilities while participants navigated virtual desktop environments, assessing information-seeking behavior (Experiment 1) and movement dynamics (Experiment 2) while approaching intersections. In Experiment 1, we found that participants requested navigation guidance while in path segments approaching an intersection and the guidance facilitated choice behavior. In Experiment 2, we found that participants tended to orient themselves toward an upcoming turn direction before entering an intersection, particularly as they became more familiar with the environment. Some of these patterns were modulated by individual differences in spatial ability, sense of direction, spatial strategies, and gender. Together, we provide novel evidence that deciding whether to continue straight or turn involves a dynamic, distributed decision-making process that is prompted by upcoming intersections and modulated by individual differences and environmental experience. We discuss implications of these results for spatial decision-making theory and the development of innovative adaptive, beacon-based navigation guidance systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Tufts University, Center for Applied Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531); U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, RDNS-SEW-THC, Natick, USA (GRID:grid.487082.1); Tufts University, Department of Psychology, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531)
2 Tufts University, Center for Applied Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531); U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, RDNS-SEW-THC, Natick, USA (GRID:grid.487082.1)
3 Tufts University, Center for Applied Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531); Tufts University, Department of Psychology, Medford, USA (GRID:grid.429997.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7531)