It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Subduction zones are pivotal for the recycling of Earth’s outer layer into its interior. However, the conditions under which new subduction zones initiate are enigmatic. Here, we constructed a transdisciplinary database featuring detailed analysis of more than a dozen documented subduction zone initiation events from the last hundred million years. Our initial findings reveal that horizontally forced subduction zone initiation is dominant over the last 100 Ma, and that most initiation events are proximal to pre-existing subduction zones. The SZI Database is expandable to facilitate access to the most current understanding of subduction zone initiation as research progresses, providing a community platform that establishes a common language to sharpen discussion across the Earth Science community.
Despite numerous advances in our understanding of subduction since the theory of plate tectonics was established, the mechanisms of subduction zone initiation remain highly controversial. Here, the authors present a transdisciplinary and expandable community database of subduction zone initiation events in the last 100 Ma, which establishes a clear direction for future research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 University of Oslo, Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.5510.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8921)
2 University College London, Department of Earth Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 Cardiff University, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff, UK (GRID:grid.5600.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0807 5670)
4 Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 7477)
5 University of Queensland, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
6 Yale University, Department of Geology and Geophysics, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)
7 Utrecht University, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000000120346234)
8 University of Bayreuth, Bavarian Geoinstitute, Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)