It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Many volcanoes erupt compositionally homogeneous magmas over timescales ranging from decades to millennia. This monotonous activity is thought to reflect a high degree of chemical homogeneity in their magmatic systems, leading to predictable eruptive behaviour. We combine petrological analyses of erupted crystals with new thermodynamic models to characterise the diversity of melts in magmatic systems beneath monotonous shield volcanoes in the Galápagos Archipelago (Wolf and Fernandina). In contrast with the uniform basaltic magmas erupted at the surface over long timescales, we find that the sub-volcanic systems contain extreme heterogeneity, with melts extending to rhyolitic compositions. Evolved melts are in low abundance and large volumes of basalt flushing through the crust from depth overprint their chemical signatures. This process will only maintain monotonous activity while the volume of melt entering the crust is high, raising the possibility of transitions to more silicic activity given a decrease in the crustal melt flux.
In this study the authors show that monotonous basaltic volcanoes can host a range of melts in their sub-volcanic systems, extending to rhyolitic compositions. The study implies that volcanoes which have produced monotonous basaltic lavas on long timescales could transition to more explosive, silica-rich eruptions in the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Trinity College Dublin, Department of Geology, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.8217.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9705); University of Cambridge, Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
2 Colgate University, Department of Geology, Hamilton, USA (GRID:grid.254361.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0659 2404); U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Earth Sciences, Alexandria, USA (GRID:grid.431093.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 7073)
3 The University of Manchester, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000000121662407)
4 University of Cambridge, Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
5 Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Instituto Geofísico, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.440857.a)
6 United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)