It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The groundwater crisis in northwestern India is the result of over-exploitation of groundwater resources for irrigation. The Government of India has targeted a 20 percent improvement in irrigation groundwater use efficiency. In this perspective, and using a regional-scale calibrated and validated three-dimensional groundwater flow model, this article provides the first forecasts of water levels in the study area up to the year 2028, both with and without this improvement in use efficiency. Future water levels without any mitigation efforts are anticipated to decline by up to 2.8 m/year in some areas. A simulation with a 20 percent reduction in groundwater abstraction shows spatially varied aquifer responses. Tangible results are visible in a decade, and the water-level decline rates decrease by 36–67 percent in over-exploited areas. Although increasing irrigation use efficiency provides tangible benefits, an integrated approach to agricultural water management practice that incorporates use efficiency along with other measures like water-efficient cropping patterns and rainwater harvesting may yield better results in a shorter period.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Delhi, Department of Geology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.8195.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 4999)
2 University of Delhi, Department of Geology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.8195.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 4999); Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Earth Sciences, Kanpur, India (GRID:grid.417965.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8702 0100)
3 Durham University, Institute of Hazard, Risk, and Resilience and Department of Geography, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572)
4 Durham University, Institute of Hazard, Risk, and Resilience and Department of Geography, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572); Arcadis, Water and Environment Division, Amersfoort, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.507601.5)
5 Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Earth Sciences, Kanpur, India (GRID:grid.417965.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8702 0100)
6 University of Delhi, Department of Geology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.8195.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 4999); Geological Survey of India, Jaipur, India (GRID:grid.237422.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1768 2669)
7 Banaras Hindu University, Department of Geology, Varanasi, India (GRID:grid.411507.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 8816)
8 NGRI, Hyderabad, India (GRID:grid.419382.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0496 9708)