Full text

Turn on search term navigation

1. What Are Bacteriophages?

Bacteriophages, also known informally as phages (from the Greek word “phagein”, which means “to devour”), are viruses with the ability to infect and kill bacteria; hence, the term “bacteriophages” means “bacteria eaters”. Phages are ubiquitous; they are present in all terrestrial and aquatic habitats where their host bacteria live, controlling those bacterial populations. Bacteriophages are the most abundant biological forms in the biosphere, with an estimated number of 1031 [1]. Phage taxonomic classification is the responsibility of the Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses Subcommitee (BAVS) of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), which have extended the formal virus classification to 15 hierarchical ranks. The system has evolved from the one based on the morphology and the molecular composition of the virus genome (the main criteria for the classification at the family level) to the current system that also considers host range, pathogenity, and sequence similarity. ICTV currently defines 19 phage families, the most-well characterized being Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, Podoviridae, Inoviridae, Microviridae and the recently described ones Ackermannviridae and Herelleviridae, all of them within the Caudovirales order [2,3,4,5]. Phages, composed of a capsid that encloses the viral genome consisting of either single or double-stranded DNA or RNA [2], are classified as either virulent or temperate according to their life cycle. After infection, virulent phages take control of the metabolic machinery of the bacteria and use it to replicate themselves and synthesize new phage particles. The viral progeny is released from the host cell by lysis, resulting in the death of the host and allowing the new particles to start a new lytic cycle. Temperate phages, on the other hand, often initiate a lysogenic cycle; this involves the integration of the viral nucleic acid into the bacterial genome, remaining in the prokaryotic cell as prophages. These prophages are transmitted, together with the bacterial genome, to the descendants of the host, and this transmission continues until the lytic cycle is induced. A variant of the lysogenic cycle is the so-called carrier state or pseudolysogenic cycle, in which the nucleic acid of the phage does not replicate but instead remains inactive within the host. Probably, pseudolysogeny occurs when cells are undergoing starvation, and there is not enough available energy for viral gene expression. When nutrients are again provided, the pseudolysogenic state is resolved with either the initiation of the lytic cycle or the establishment of true lysogeny. Finally, another form of phage–host cell interaction is referred to as chronic infection. In this type of lifecycle, the phage replicates actively in the host originating the viral progeny that exit the bacteria by different mechanisms without bacterial lysis (Figure 1) [6,7]. The ability of bacteriophages to kill bacteria advocates a widespread role for phages as an alternative to antibiotics. The use of lytic phages or their products for the treatment of bacterial diseases is known as phage therapy [8], and this type of therapy presents major advantages over chemotherapy (Box 1).

Box 1. Advantages of phage therapy.

2. A Look at the Past

In 1896, Ernst Hankin demonstrated the presence of antimicrobial activity against Vibrio cholera in the waters of the Ganges river in India [9]. However, it was not until 1915–1917 that Twort and d’Herelle, independently, described the putative existence of filterable and transmissible agents with the ability to lyse bacteria [10,11,12]. According to Twort, a British pathologist, the lytic principle would be of enzymatic nature, while d’Herelle, a Canadian microbiologist, speculated that it represented a virus. However, it took an additional 30 years for the hypothesis formulated by d’Herelle to be confirmed; the potential of phages as antimicrobials was soon suspected and quickly corroborated. D’Herelle demonstrated in 1919 that phage preparations could be used to treat patients with dysentery, at the Hospital des Enfants-Malades in Paris [13]. Before treating patients with phage preparations, d’Herelle tested the safety of the treatment on himself. Subsequently, numerous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of phages treatment against a variety of diseases, including cholera, staphylococcal infections, typhoid fever, and Shigella and Salmonella colitis [14,15,16]. The treatment was so effective that it prompted many pharmaceutical companies to start marketing phage preparations to combat bacterial infections. Almost in parallel, researchers started evaluating the possibility of treating plant bacterial diseases with phages [17,18]. In 1924, Mallman and Hemstreet demonstrated that a filtrate, collected from decaying cabbages, inhibited in vitro the development of the bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, a microorganism that causes black rot in these crucifers [17]. Subsequently, a variety of phages effective against different phytopathogenic bacteria, including Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum [19], Pectobacterium atrosepticum (formerly Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica) [20] or X. malvacearum [21], were isolated. Despite the early success of bacteriophages as antimicrobials, their use as a treatment, and even phage research, declined dramatically with the discovery of antibiotics, penicillin in particular. Only some Eastern European nations, such as Poland, Georgia, and Russia, continued the research in this field and the treatment of infectious diseases with phage therapy [14,22,23]. Unfortunately, despite the demonstrated potential for phage treatment of phytopathogenic bacteria, some researchers remained skeptical and questioned the efficacy of phage therapy in this field [24]. All of this, in combination with the perception, particularly among clinicians, that antibiotic treatment was safer due to their efficacy and broad spectrum [12], led to antibiotics and copper compounds being set as the standard treatment for phytopathogenic bacteria [25,26]. The discovery of penicillin in 1928 started the antibiotic era, and these compounds enjoyed great success in the treatment of bacterial infections. However, due to their extensive application and mainly their abuse and inappropriate uses, the effectiveness of these compounds was drastically reduced due to the increase in antibiotic resistance in bacteria with the emergence of strains that are resistant to all known antibiotics [27,28]. This problem was further compounded with the appearance of phytopathogenic bacteria that are resistant to copper, as is the case for some Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas species [29,30].

The bacterial treatment predicament experienced all over the world since the 1980s, in particular the difficulty in obtaining novel antibiotics with the capacity to resolve current resistance problems [31], has resulted in a renewed interest in phage therapy [14]. In fact, phage therapy is one of the seven strategies highlighted by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to address the problem of antibiotic resistance [16]. As indicated above, since 1924, phages have been applied as agents to eliminate phytopathogenic bacteria and are considered safe for use in agriculture for the control of plant diseases since the 1970s [32,33]. The evolution and the development of phages as biocontrol agents against plant pests have been the subject of several reviews since its inception in 1963 [34,35,36].

On the other hand, the quantity and the quality of agricultural crops can be also affected by the availability of pollinating insects. Insect pollination benefits up to 75% of plant species with importance in agriculture, and it is responsible for 35% of the world’s agricultural production. In this sense, and in addition to producing honey, bees are considered the most important pollinators. In particular, in the case of agricultural crops, 80% of pollination services are attributed to honeybees (Apis mellifera) [37]. This is why the decline of bee populations may be considered as a serious problem for the world’s agricultural production. This decline may be due to several reasons, including intensive farming practices, the use of chemical pesticides, and also because bees might be affected by different parasites and microorganisms. One of the most devastating bacterial diseases affecting bee larvae worldwide is American Foulbrood (AFB) caused by Paenibacillus larvae. Discarding the use of antibiotics for the reasons already mentioned, and because they could remain in the honey for a long time, thus compromising its quality and safety, incineration of the infected hives remains as the only viable treatment [38]. In this context, phage therapy also emerges as a promising alternative. For this purpose, different phages that have proven to be effective against numerous P. larvae strains [39,40,41] as well as promising endolysins [38] have been isolated and characterized.

In addition to agriculture, phages have also been considered for the control of infectious diseases in aquaculture [42,43]. As with other living organisms, fish in crowded conditions, such as those found in aquaculture, are susceptible to infection by microorganisms. Poor hygienic conditions in the pools used for farming often result in increased fish susceptibility to infection [44,45]. Diseases caused by bacteria constitute one of the most important problems in aquaculture, causing major economic losses [46]. Traditional treatment involves the use of antibiotics; however, this approach currently has limited success, partly due to the appearance of multi-drug resistant bacterial strains [47], and entails the added collateral risks [48]. All these factors make it imperative to find alternative methods of controlling bacterial diseases in aquaculture, with phage therapy in particular, as it has already demonstrated that it can be an effective therapy. The first successful report on the use of bacteriophages to combat pathogenic bacteria in aquaculture came from Japan and involved the bacterium Lactococcus garviae [49]. This success aroused great interest among researchers, who demonstrated that this approach could also be used against additional bacterial species, in particular those belonging to the genus Vibrio [42,45,50,51,52].

3. The Path to the Future 3.1. Agriculture

Plant pathogens are responsible for reducing the yield and the quality of agricultural products, causing large economic losses globally [53]. A variety of disease-causing pathogenic microorganisms, such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi, can infect plants, including economically-important agricultural crops [54]. According to Mansfield et al. 2012 [55], Pseudomonas spp., Xanthomonas spp., Erwinia spp., Ralstonia spp., Agrobacterium spp., Xylella spp., Pectobacterium spp., and Dickeya spp. constitute the most common genera of pathogenic bacteria.

Copper-based bactericides and antibiotics have traditionally been the main compounds used to treat plant diseases [56]. However, these treatments are not free of adverse side effects while currently displaying limited efficacy. From an environmental point of view, copper has the disadvantage of accumulating in the soil, which becomes toxic for both plants and animals, including humans [57]. On the other hand, antibiotics are not specific and harm both phytopathogenic and beneficial bacteria present in the environment [58], including beneficial microorganisms associated with plants. In addition, copper has been extensively used since 1880, and its effectiveness is declining; copper resistance, mediated by either a plasmid or chromosomal genes, has been reported in a variety of phytopathogenic bacteria [59,60,61]. Similarly, resistance to the antibiotic streptomycin (used in agriculture since 1950) was reported in a variety of bacterial species, including pathogenic strains of X. versicatoria, that infects tomatoes and peppers [62], and E. amylovora, an apple pathogen [63]. The extensive use of antibiotics not only in agriculture but also in the treatment of humans and animals has considerably contributed to the increased emergence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria [64,65] as well as to the dissemination of the genes responsible for this antibiotic resistance (resistome). The spread of this resistome was facilitated by the rhizospheric microbiome [66]. The ever-growing number of AMR bacteria has resulted in a major reduction in the effectiveness of antibiotics, not only in agricultural settings but also in human health, with increasing numbers of human pathogens becoming resistant to current treatments, resulting in an escalation in mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases [64,65].

Due to the problems described above, there is currently a progressive trend to reduce the use of toxic compounds and antibiotics as pesticides, with the expectation that the use of some of these compounds may be banned in the future [67]. Furthermore, there is a widespread growing concern among consumers concerning the use of chemicals and antibiotics in the food growing industry, with some people already rejecting food produced using these products [68]. In summary, there is growing need and demand from both industry groups and consumers for new non-toxic, environmentally friendly pesticides with biological control, as part of an integrated pest management (IPM), as the most accepted alternative [54,69]. This highlights the role of phages as biological agents in the fight against phytopathogenic bacteria.

As a consequence, the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, have seen a resurgence in phage research, with numerous studies focusing on the potential for phages to control bacterial plant diseases. A selection of some of the most relevant publications on the characterization and/or the efficacy (in vitro and/or in the field) of different phages against pathogens affecting diverse agricultural crops is summarized in Table 1.

3.1.1. Potato Diseases

The most significant bacterial diseases affecting agricultural potato cultivation are soft rot and blackleg (caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species), bacterial wilt (resulting from R. solanacearum infection), and common scab (with Streptomyces scabies as the pathogen). Different phages and phage cocktails that are efficient against these diseases are shown in Table 1. These include the phage cocktail, used by Carstens et al. in 2018 [76] against soft rot caused by D. solani, which partially reduced the incidence (from 93% to 49%) and the severity (by 75%) of the disease. The bioassay carried out with the phages ΦPD10.3 and ΦPD23.1 to combat soft rot caused by D. solani and Pectobacterium species [73] resulted in an 80–95% reduction in the severity of the disease. It is worth mentioning that treatment with phage Wc5r proved effective against phage-resistant strains of P. carotovorum [77]; while phage ΦAS1 is an efficient therapy for potato common scab, produced by S. scabies, when used to treat seed tubers [70]. The study by Wei and colleagues, using a phage cocktail to combat the potato bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum, resulted in 80% of the plants protected against the bacterial pathogen [74].

3.1.2. Tomato Diseases

Bacterial spot, produced by X. campestris pv. Vesicatoria, and bacterial wilt, caused by R. solanacearum, are the most important bacterial diseases affecting cultivated tomatoes. Different phages and phage cocktails have been successfully used to treat these plant diseases, as summarized in Table 1. These include a phage cocktail that reduced the severity of bacterial spot produced by X. campestris pv vesicatoroa by 17% in field experiments, which was also an effective (reduction of 40.5% to 0.9%) treatment for the disease in greenhouse conditions [78]. In other field experiments, the combination of phages with the acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) plant activator resulted in a more efficient control of bacterial spot as compared to the standard treatment combining copper and Mancozeb [80]. Also noteworthy is the research by Bae et al., demonstrating that phage PE204 (propagated using the host strain SL341) completely inhibited the tomato bacterial wilt disease [82].

3.1.3. Additional Agricultural Crops

A variety of phages and/or combination of phages have also been effectively used against plant diseases, such as the radish common scab caused by S. scabies [83], the onion leaf blight resulting from X. axonopodis pv. allii infection [84], the lettuce soft rot caused by P. carotovorum ssp. [85], the bacterial blight in leeks infected with P. syringae pv. porri [86], and the leaf blight disease (BLB) produced in rice by X. oryzae [87], as summarized in Table 1. In addition, treatment of the cultivated mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus with phage ΦPto-bp6g resulted in effective protection of the fungi against P. tolaasii [94].

3.1.4. Fruit Trees

A variety of commercially-important fruit tree diseases have been successfully treated with a variety of either phages or phage cocktails, as summarized in Table 1. These include grapefruit Asiatic citrus canker caused by X. axonopodis pv. citri, the orange bacterial spot produced by X. axonopodis pv. citrumelo, the fire blight resulting from the infection of pear and apple trees with E. amylovora, Pierce’s disease in vines infected with Xylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa, and kiwi canker disease caused by P. syringae pv. actinidiae. These include the phage cocktail used in greenhouse experiments, which reduced the severity of grapefruit Asian citrus canker by 59% [88] and the phage cocktail used against the bacterial spot produced in oranges by X. axonopodis pv. citrumelo, shown in two trials to reduce the disease by 35–48% [88]. In addition, phages ΦEa1337-26 and ΦEa2345-6 reduced E. amylovora infection, which causes fire blight in pear trees, by 84% and 96%, respectively [89]. Additionally, the levels of X. fastidiosa (which causes the Pierce’s disease in grapes) were significantly reduced by inoculation with a cocktail consisting of four phages [90]. Furthermore, treatment with phages KHUΦ34, KHUΦ38, and KHUΦ44 produced a very effective lytic activity against different P. syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) biovars responsible for kiwi canker disease; the effectiveness of the treatment changed according to the bacteriophages used [91]. In addition, the commercially available phage Φ6 was also effective, both in vitro and ex vivo, particularly against two highly aggressive Psa strains [92]. Similarly interesting, in a recent study, it has been shown that the combination of phages PN05 and PN09 and the natural antimicrobial carvacrol (2.0 mg/mL) controlled Psa regrowth for more than 40 h, preventing the emergence of phage-resistant mutants and controlling biofilm development [93].

3.2. Aquaculture

Commercial aquaculture has progressively become one of the main sectors involved in animal production, with a major role in human diets. Approximately 50% of fish and shellfish consumed by humans comes from aquaculture (FAO, Rome, Italy, 2016) [95]. However, the development and the growth of this industry has always been limited by infectious diseases affecting animals due to the high density and the homogeneity of the fish farmed. Despite the preventive measures progressively adopted, the stress produced on the animal populations by the high density in conjunction with potentially deficient hygiene measures and environmental deterioration provide conditions that favor emergence, propagation, and prevalence of infections, causing major economic losses [45]. The situation is further complicated by the fact that some of the fish pathogens can also cause important disease in humans [96]. As is the case for other the animal production industries, antibiotics constitute an integral part of fish management and are used in aquaculture both as prophylactics and for the treatment of bacterial infections [48]. Antibiotic therapy is currently experiencing conflicting effectiveness in aquaculture and, as discussed above, the selective pressure created by overuse and abuse of these compounds has also contributed to the selection and the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in aquaculture conditions [97,98]. These difficulties, together with the warning by the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding antibiotic resistance [99], have galvanized the industry into the exploration of novel pathogen control alternatives. Although vaccination is an option for the control of infectious diseases, there are not many current vaccines authorized to use in aquaculture; furthermore, this approach is not feasible for crustaceans and mollusks, and its efficacy is either low or null for juvenile fish [100]. This makes it imperative to evaluate new options or complimentary alternatives for prevention and biocontrol of infectious diseases in aquaculture; these include the use of probiotics, phytobiotics, quorum sensing interference mechanisms, and particularly phage therapy [101,102].

Some bacterial species belonging to the genera Edwardsiella, Lactococcus, Pseudomonas, Aeromonas, and Flavobacterium, but mainly to the genus Vibrio, constitute the main bacterial pathogens of cultured fish and shellfish. Numerous in vitro assays testing the effect of phage therapy on fish pathogenic bacteria have been carried out over the last two decades; in addition, a number of in vivo studies have also evaluated the potential of bacteriophages for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. These studies include the use of phages to effectively combat multidrug resistant bacteria [103,104]. A selection of some of the most relevant studies on the characterization and/or the efficacy (in vitro and/or in the field) of phages from different families against a wide range of pathogens that cause a variety of disease in many fish and shellfish species are shown in Table 2. These include the first studies describing the protective effect of phage PLgY-16 (administered either orally or intraperitoneally) against lactococcosis, a disease of yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) infected with L. garvieae [49]. It is also worth highlighting the use of phage PPpW-4, administered in the feed, to combat the bacterial hemorrhagic ascites disease in ayu fish (Plecoglossus altivelis) [105] caused by P. plecoglossicida. Many of the diseases caused by different species belonging to the genus Vibrio have also been efficiently controlled by phages. In particular, treatment of Penaeus monodon larvae suffering from luminescent vibriosis produced by V. harveyi with phages from the Siphoviridae family (the bacteriophages were added in the tank water) resulted in an 85% survival of the larvae, as compared to 65–68% of animals surviving after antibiotic treatment [106].

Table 2 also includes an example of a lytic phage, also applied in the tank water, that was successfully used to treat Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) infected with V. anguillarum; the treatment resulted in a survival rate of up to 100%, while lessthan 10% of the untreated fish survived the disease [113]. It is also noteworthy to mention that a cocktail of phages belonging to the family Siphoviridae and applied in the water effectively controlled the vibriosis produced by Vibrio sp. Va-F3 in the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, increasing its survival from 20% (untreated group) to 91.4% (phage treated group); the success rate of the treatment was equivalent to that obtained with antibiotic therapy [116]. Phage treatment also proved effective against a variety of additional fish pathogens, with the administration by intramuscular injection of phages Φ2, and Φ5 (Myoviridae) achieving up to 100% survival in catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) infected with Motile Aeromonas Septicemia (MAS), caused by A. hydrophila; the survival rate was 18.3% in untreated fish [118]. A similar remarkable protective effect was achieved with the PAS-1 phage when used to combat the furunculosis caused by A. salmonicida in Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [119]. In in vitro studies, the use of effective phage cocktails (AS-A, AS-D, AS-E) against this pathogen showed a faster control of bacterial concentration as well as a decrease in the frequency of occurrence of phage-resistant mutants. [122]. Worthy of note is also the success obtained when the phage FCP1 was administered intramuscularly to treat the disease caused by F. columnaris in the catfish Clarias batrachus [126].

4. Challenges to Be Address in Phage Therapy

As pointed out above, phages constitute a very promising alternative for the treatment of bacterial diseases in both agriculture and aquaculture. However, the use of phages still presents a number of challenges that need to be thoroughly investigated in order to make their use a reality (summarized in Box 2).

Box 2. Phage therapy challenges to be addressed.

One important hurdle deals with the use of bacteriophages on a large scale in the natural environment. One of the major problems in agriculture is the potential instability of phages in the environment in both plant microbial habits, phyllosophere and rhizosphere, due to the effect of external factors such as temperature, desiccation and, in particular, UV light. This highlights the importance of optimizing the phage application time or season and the question of how to best administer the bacteriophage accompanied by a viable host that is harmless to the plant or protected by non-infectivity affecting compounds [79,127,128]. The challenges in aquaculture include the inability of some phages to reproduce in the environment, even when their lytic cycle is well defined and studied under in vitro conditions [129]. In addition, the advantages and the disadvantages of different methods of large scale administration, whether by injection, as a food additive, or externally by immersion, must be evaluated, not only for each pathogen and disease but also according to the development stage of the animal, in order to determine the best standards for their use and draw contingency plans for future treatment [50,130,131].

Another important point refers to the availability and the suitability of phages as safe treatments in different applications. Given the specificity of phages that often only infect one or a few bacterial strains, it is essential to develop large collections of lytic bacteriophages in order to prepare customized cocktails that can infect the pathogenic bacteria [132]. In addition, these collections must be continuously updated to include novel phages that are effective against emerging bacterial strains. These requirements can only be met by increasing the bacteriophage research, not only to obtain novel phages but also to fully understand their molecular biology and mechanisms of action. The accumulated knowledge will also help eliminate potential risks related to the use of phages; these include the possibility of transferring virulence or other harmful genes as well as any putative unwanted effects they could exert on other microorganisms that are either part of the microbiota associated with treated plants and animals or present in the environment [133].

Another aspect that needs extensive research deals with the optimization of the production processes; these procedures must not only guarantee the production of a great variety of phages, but it is also imperative that they do so at competitive pricing [134]. Another area that cannot be forgotten is the optimization of the formulation of the phage cocktails that must meet the needs of each application while guaranteeing stability and high purity of the preparations, which must be free from contaminants such as endotoxins or lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [135].

In addition, legislation on bacteriophage use must be developed in parallel to the above mentioned optimization in application and large scale production of phages; this legislation is the responsibility of governments that need to implement the relevant regulations for phage therapy under legal conditions and sanitary environment security [136].

The last and most worrisome aspect relates to the already described emergence of phage-resistant bacteria [137], and this matter could become one of the major limiting factors in the use of phages for the control of bacterial infections. Resistance can be acquired by either mutation and selection and/or by horizontal gene transfer, and this characteristic can be transferred to the descendants [138,139]. All six stages of phage infection (attachment, penetration, transcription, biosynthesis, maturation, and lysis) are susceptible to the development of resistant bacteria. The mechanisms involved in this resistance include prevention of phage adsorption, blocking DNA entry, abortive infection, and the role played by CRISPR/Cas and modification-restriction systems [140]. However, studies conducted have thus far indicate that bacterial resistance to phages is around 10 times lower than antibiotic resistance [141]. An additional advantage is that, unlike antibiotic resistance, phage resistance produces a less virulent microorganism, as phage receptors on the surface of the bacteria also act as virulence factors [142,143]. This attenuation of virulence was observed in bacterial strains from species such as F. columnare [144], F. psychrophilum [145], and V. anguillarum [146].

The emergence of phage resistant bacteria has been reported not only in plant pathogens such as E. carotovora [147] and P. atrosepticum [148] but also in fish pathogens such as P. plecoglossicidae [149], A. salmonicida [120], and Streptococcus iniae [150]. As is the case for the resistance to antimicrobial agents, this problem can be prevented or resolved by the use of different strategies. These include applying cocktails containing not just a single phage but a mixture of three to five different phages [36,151] and the use of phage endolysins [8,104] in order to prevent the appearance of resistance during phage treatments. Bacterial resistance to phages usually appears at a rate between 10−6 and 10−8. Infection with a mixture of bacteriophages reduces the rate of occurrence of resistances in a variable range (10−4–10−8 for most of the studies). The highest reductions are indeed achieved with cocktails that include several phages exhibiting different routes of infection. [96,122,152]. Additional strategies to prevent and combat the emergence of microbial resistance include the combination of different therapeutic approaches, the use of mutant phages obtained from the wild type bacteriophage that regain their activity against the bacteria [140], and the isolation of novel or modified phages [153] that are effective against the resistant microorganisms.

5. Conclusions In conclusion, phage therapy was rediscovered two decades ago to counteract the current difficulties posed by bacterial resistance to antibiotics and, in particular, the recent appearance of bacterial strains that are not only multi-resistant but can overcome treatment with all known antibiotics. Phage therapy has demonstrated its potential effectiveness in the prevention and the control of important bacterial infections, both in agriculture and aquaculture, and it has proved to represent an excellent and viable alternative to antibiotic treatment. Unfortunately, although phages were discovered more than one hundred years ago, phage research was eclipsed by the dominant role given to antibiotics in human and animal health; these compounds were hailed as “silver bullets” that could combat any human or animal diseases. This short-sighted approach truncated the development of a solid phage research in addition to considerably limiting the effort to investigation alternative approaches to antibiotic treatment. This lack of research diversity has resulted in the conundrum we are facing now, with antibiotic resistant rampant in bacteria and no viable short-term alternative to combat pathogenic organisms. It is essential to immediately rectify and direct research efforts and money into areas such as phage therapy, which have already demonstrated a great potential in the control and the elimination of bacterial pathogens. This promising technique needs increased research efforts in order to design effective and reproducible treatments that need to be customized for the different applications. In addition, it is also required that governments and organizations develop the relevant legislation to guarantee appropriate and safe use of these technologies. Finally, we must learn from the mistakes of the past in order to prevent drawbacks and problems in the treatment of pathogenic bacteria. With this in mind, we propose the use of phage cocktails as biocontrol agents in agriculture and aquaculture, combined with the use of endolysins and antibiotics within the framework of an integrated microbial infections management, to prevent the appearance of resistant bacterial strains.

Figure 1. Phage-host interactions. (1): Lytic cycle. (2): Chronic cycle. (3): Lysogenic cycle. (4): Pseudolysogeny.

Phage/Phages Cocktails (Family) Target Microorganism Plant Disease Relevant Achievements Reference
ΦAS1 (Siphoviridae)Streptomyces scabiesPotatoCommon scab
  • Isolation of a new phage from a potato field near Albany, Western Australia
  • Phage propagation by an effective mini-biorreactor
  • Efficient disinfection of seed potato tubers: phage-treated seeds significantly reduced the levels of surface lesions of scab compared with untreated tubers
[70]
vB_DsoM_LIMEstone1, vB_DsoM_LIMEstone2 (Myoviridae)Dickeya solaniPotato Soft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from soil samples from a potato field trial (Merelbeke, Belgium)

  • In laboratory assays, the phages reduced the disease incidence and the severity on potato tubers. In a field trial (using potato tubers infected with D. solani), the phage treatment resulted in higher crop yields

[71]
ΦD1, ΦD2, ΦD3, ΦD4, ΦD5, ΦD7, ΦD9, ΦD10, ΦD11 (Myoviridae)Dickeya solaniPotatoSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from soil samples collected in different regions in Poland

  • In the in vitro and potato slice assay experiments, phages were able to stop the growth and efficiently lyse D. solani cells, protecting the tuber tissue from maceration caused by the bacteria

[72]
ΦPD10.3, ΦPD23.1 (Myoviridae)Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum P. wasabiae Dickeya solaniPotatoSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from soil, rhizosphere soil, and potato plant and tuber samples obtained from different regions in Poland
  • Phage genomes were characterized and proteomes obtained
  • In potato slice and whole tuber assays, the phages (applied individually or together) were able to reproducibly and significantly reduce soft rot infections when compared to controls (inoculated with a mixture of bacteria)
[73]
P-PSG-1 (Siphoviridae), P-PSG-2, P-PSG-3, P-PSG-7 (Siphoviridae), P-PSG-8, and P-PSG-9Ralstonia solanacearumPotatoBacterial wilt
  • Isolation of new phages from different water sources in Kenya and China

  • A phage cocktail with speed and efficacy in the lysis of R. solanacearum enhanced was formulated

  • The phage cocktail was very effective protecting the potato plants from bacterial wilt by injection of the phages into the plants. The cocktail was also able to reduce the density of live bacteria in pathogen-contaminated sterilized soils
[74]
vB_PatP_CB1, vB_PatP_CB3, vB_PatP_CB4 (Podoviridae)Pectobacterium atrosepticumPotatoSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from soil samples collected from potato grading machinery and potato fields from two farms in Co. Cork, Ireland
  • Phage genomes were characterized and the proteome for CB1 obtained

  • The cocktail containing phages CB1, CB3, and CB4 showed effective protective effect, evaluated on whole tubers, against the infection caused by a mix of two strains of P. atrosepticum (DSM 18077 and DSM 30186)

[75]
Dagda, Dagda_B1, Katbat, Luksen, Mysterion, P694 (Podoviridae)Dickeya solaniPotatoSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from different environments at different time points and at different locations in Denmark

  • A phage cocktail formulated with ability to significantly decrease the incidence of soft rot and the disease severity after 5 days of storage post-infection with D. solani

[76]
Wc5r, Phage cocktailPectobacterim atrosepticum P. carotovorumPotatoSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of new phages from soil and water samples collected in Wuhan, China

  • Phage Wc5r showed cross-activity against P. atrosepticum and two phage-resistant P. carotovorum strains

  • A formulated phage cocktail applied on potato slices (before or within an hour after bacterial inoculation) was able to reduce 90% soft rot symptoms
[77]
Mixture of four h-mutant (Agriphage, Agriphi, Logan, Utah)Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoriaTomatoBacterial spot
  • Foliar applications of phages to field-grown tomatoes decreased disease severity compared with untreated control plants.
  • The incidence of bacterial spot on greenhouse-grown seedlings was also reduced in bacteriophage-treated plants
[78]
Formulated phage cocktails Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoriaTomatoBacterial spot
  • The formulations analyzed significantly increased the longevity of the phage on the plant surface
  • Protective formulations significantly improved the efficacy of phage treatments both in the greenhouse and in the field. Skim milk and Casecrete gave the best results in greenhouse and field assays, respectively
[79]
6 Phages (Agriphage, OmniLytics, Inc., Salt Lake Cith, UT) combined with plant activator (ASM) Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoriaTomato Bacterial spot

  • Formulation of a phage mixture containing six different phages specific to X. campestris pv. vesicatoria race T3 strain 91–118

  • In field experiments, application of host-specific phages was effective against the bacterial spot pathogen, showing better disease containment than with copper-Mancozeb or the untreated controls
[80]
ΦRSL1 (Myoviridae)Ralstonia solanacearumTomatoBacterial wilt
  • Alternative phage biocontrol method using a unique phage instead of a phage cocktail
  • During the experimental period, tomato plants treated with ΦRSL1 phage showed no symptoms of wilting, whereas all untreated plants had wilted by 18 days post-infection.
  • Active ΦRSL1 particles can be recovered from the roots of treated plants and from soils 4 months post-infection
[81]
PE204 (Podoviridae)Ralstonia solanacearumTomatoBacterial wilt

  • Simultaneous application of phage PE204 and R. solanacearum on tomato rhizosphere completely inhibited the occurrence of bacterial wilt.

  • Addition of Silwet L-77 to the phage suspension did not impair the disease control activity of the phage, allowing the control of the bacterial wilt
[82]
Stsc1, Stsc3 (Siphoviridae)Streptomyces scabiesRadishCommon scab
  • Isolation of new phages from soil samples

  • Phages Stsc1 and Stsc3 infected 88% and 75% of the pathogenic S. scabiei strains tested, respectively

  • Both phages prevented symptoms of S. scabiei on radish seedlings

[83]
Bacteriophage mixture (AgriPhage, OmniLytics, Salt Lake City, UT)Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. alliiOnionXanthomonas leaf blight
  • Under field conditions, applications of the mix of phages reduced disease severity in an equivalent or better manner than weekly applications of copper hydroxide plus Mancozeb.
  • Phage populations remained on onion leaves for at least 72 to 96 h under field and greenhouse conditions, respectively
[84]
PP1 (Podoviridae)Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorumLettuceSoft rot/Blackleg
  • Isolation of a new phage from soil samples (Chinese cabbage fields)
  • A rapid and strong lytic activity against its host bacteria was shown by the new phage

  • Treatment with phage PP1 significantly reduced the disease caused by P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum

[85]
vB_PsyM_KIL1, vB_PsyM_KIL2, vB_PsyM_KIL3, vB_PsyM_KIL4, and vB_PsyM_KIL5, vB_PsyM_KIL3b (Myoviridae)Pseudomonas syringae pv. porriLeekBacterial blight
  • Isolation of new phages from infected fields in Flanders
  • Phage genomes were characterized and proteomes obtained
  • Classified into a novel clade
  • Development of a phage cocktail effective against 41 tested strains
  • Specific bio-assays showed the in planta effectiveness of phages and attenuation of symptoms development in a field experiment
[86]
ΦXOT1, ΦXOT2, ΦXOM1, ΦXOM2, ΦXOF1, ΦXOF2, ΦXOF3, ΦXOF4 (Siphoviridae)Xanthomonas oryzaeRiceLeaf blight disease (BLB)
  • Isolation of new phages from diseased plant leaves and soil samples

  • The phage ΦXOF4 showed the broadest host range, killing all the pathogenic X. oryzae strains tested

  • Seedlings raised from phage-treated seeds displayed complete bacterial growth inhibition and reduced incidence of BLB disease
[87]
CP2, ΦXac2005-1, ccΦ7, ccΦ13, ΦXacm2004-4, ΦXacm2004-16, ΦX44, ΦXaacA1Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citriGrapefruitAsiatic citrus canker
  • In greenhouse assays, phage treatment significantly reduced the disease severity when applied without skim milk. If skim milk was added, no disease reduction was observed
  • In a citrus nursery no synergistic effect was observed by combining phages and copper-Mancozeb
[88]
ΦEa1337-26 (Podoviridae), ΦEa2345-6 (Myoviridae)Erwinia amylovoraPear and apple treesFire blight
  • Isolation of new phages from apple and pear orchards in the Okanagan and Fraser Valleys of British Columbia

  • Phages ΦEa1337-26 and ΦEa2345-6 reduced the bacterial infection by 84% and 96%, respectively, when applied on detached pear blossoms using as a carrier the epiphyte bacterium Pantoea agglomerans Eh21-5

  • Phage ΦEa2345-6, combined with Eh21-5, reduced infection of fire blight on apple flowers of potted apple trees with an efficacy comparable to the antibiotic streptomycin
[89]
CP2, ΦXac2005-1, ccΦ7, ccΦ13, ΦXacm2004-4, ΦXacm2004-16, ΦX44, ΦXaacA1 Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citrumeloOrangeCitrus bacterial spot
  • In a commercial citrus nursery, phages application significantly reduced the progress of the disease on Valencia oranges (a moderately susceptible culture)
  • In an experimental nursery, under low disease pressure, phage treatment significantly reduced the disease incidence providing similar levels of control than copper-Mancozeb treatment
[88]
Sano, Salvo, Prado, PazXylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosaGrapevinesPierce’s disease (PD)
  • Development of a cocktail with four lytic phages

  • The phage cocktail significantly reduced X. fastidiosa levels in grapevines and prevented the development of PD symptoms

  • No in planta phage-resistant X. fastidiosa isolates were recovered, and in vitro selected X. fastidiosa mutants did not cause PD symptoms

[90]
KHUΦ34 (Myoviridae), KHUΦ38 (Podoviridae), KHUΦ44 (Myoviridae)Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiaeKiwifruitCanker disease
  • Isolation of new phages from soils collected from kiwifruit orchards in South Korea

  • Phages showed activity against strains of P. syringae pv. actinidiae, including Psa2 and Psa3 groups. Some of them were also effective against other P. syringae pathovars

  • The effective lytic activity of phages KHUΦ34, KHUΦ38, and KHUΦ44 allows one to propose their potential use in the control of bacterial canker disease in kiwifruits
[91]
Φ6 (Cystoviridae) Leibniz- Institute DSMZ collectionPseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiaeKiwifruitCanker disease
  • Phage Φ6 was effective against two biovar 3 (a highly aggressive pathogen) Psa strains using both in vitro and ex vivo test
  • The inactivated CRA-FRU 14.10 Psa strain did not re-grow after treatment was concluded
[92]
PN05 PN09 Cocktail of both phages (Myoviridae)Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiaeKiwifruitCanker disease
  • Isolation of new phages from water samples collected in Hangzhou, China
  • The combined treatment with phages (PN05 and PN09) and carvacrol effectively reduced the Psa concentration, preventing the emergence of phage-resistant mutants and controlling biofilm development
[93]
ΦPto-bp6gPseudomonas tolaasiiPleurotus ostreatusBrown blotch disease
  • The phage ΦPto-bp6g was characterized at the genomic level

  • Phage ΦPto-bp6g showed strong bactericidal activity against P. tolaasii

  • The mushroom (P. ostreatus) buds treated with the mixture of P. tolaasii and phage ΦPto-bp6g, exhibited over time the same growing pattern that the control, developing normal mushroom fruit bodies

[94]

Entries are grouped according to the agricultural crop, and the works related to the same crop were ordered chronologically.

Phage/Phages Cocktails (Family) Target Microorganism Fish or Aquaculture Product Disease Relevant Achievements Reference
PLgY-16, PLgY-30, PLgW-1 (Siphoviridae)Lactococcus garvieaeYellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata)Lactococcosis

  • Isolation of new phages: PLgY-16 and PLgY were obtained from cultures of L. garviae isolated from diseased yellowtail; PLgW-1 was isolated from natural seawater

  • According to the results, anti-L. garvieae phage (administered orally or intraperitoneally) protected fish from experimental L. garvieae infection

[49]
PPpW-3 (Podoviridae) PPpW-4 (Myoviridae) and a mixture of PPpW-3/W-4Pseudomonas plecoglossicida PTH-9802 strainAyu fish (Plecoglossus altivelis)Bacterial hemorrhagic ascites disease

  • Phages inhibited in vitro the growth of P. plecoglossicida. The highest inhibitory activity was shown by the mixture

  • In a field trial, when phage PPpW-3/W-4 was supplied with the food to ayu in a pond where the disease occurred naturally, fish mortality decreased to one-third after a 2 week period
[105]
Viha8, Viha10 (Siphoviridae) Viha9, Viha11Vibrio harveyiShimp larvae (Penaeus monodon)Luminescent vibriosis
  • Isolation of new phages: three from oyster tissue and one from shrimp hatchery water

  • Phage Viha10 was effective in reducing the population of V. harveyi in the biofilm formed on a high density polyethylene surface

  • In hatchery trials, the application of phage treatment (Viha8 and Viha10) resulted in 85% survival of P. monodon larvae

[106]
Viha 1, Viha 2, Viha 3,Viha 5, Viha 6, Viha 7 (Siphoviridae) Viha4 (Myoviridae)Vibrio harveyiPenaeid shrimpLuminescent vibriosis
  • Isolation of new phages from shrimp farms, hatcheries, and tidal creeks along the east and the west coasts of India

  • Phages were found to be highly lytic for V. harveyi. Six of them had a broad lytic spectrum, thus they could be potential candidates for biocontrol of this bacterium in aquaculture systems

[107]
VhCCS-01, VhCCS-02, VhCCS-04, VhCCS-06, VhCCS-17, VhCCS-20 (Siphoviridae) VhCCS-19, VhCCS-21 (Myoviridae) Vibrio harveyiPhyllosoma larvae of the tropical rock lobster (Panulirus ornatus)Luminescent vibriosis
  • Isolation of new phages from water samples from discharge channels and grow-out ponds of a prawn farm in northeastern Australia

  • The host range for purified phage included V. harveyi, V. campbellii, V. rotiferianus and V. parahaemolyticus

  • The lytic ability of the isolated phages suggested that they are appropriate for phage therapy
[108]
vB_VhaS-a, vB_VhaS (Siphoviridae)Vibrio harveyiAbalone (Haliotis laevigata).Vibriosis
  • Isolation of new phages from water or tissue sample liquid

  • In in vitro assays, the phages showed different antimicrobial abilities towards different V. harveyi isolates

  • In the bioassay, the treatment with phage resulted in 70% of abalone survival, as compared to the 0% exhibited by the positive bacterial control
[109]
pVp-1 (Siphoviridae)Vibrio parahaemolyticusOystersLuminescent vibriosis

  • Both by bath immersion and oyster surface-application, the lytic phage effectively reduced the bacterial growth of a multiple-antibiotic-resistant V. parahaemolyticus pandemic strain

[110]
vB_VpS_BA3, vB-VpS_ CA8 (Siphoviridae)Vibrio parahaemolyticus--
  • Isolation of new phages from sewage collected in Guangzhou, China
  • Taking into account the determined host range and the rate of inactivation in the in vitro phage-killing assay, phages, particularly CA8, had the potential to be used in phage therapy
[111]
ΦVP-1 (Myoviridae)Multiple-drug-resistat Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticusPenaeid shrimpAntibiofilm activity
  • Isolation of a new phage from shrimp pond water samples collected from aquafarms in Cochin, India

  • Ability to infect multiple-drug-resistant strains of mangrove and seafood origin belonging to the species V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus, and showing also biofilm reducing capacity

[112]
309, ALMED, CHOED, ALME, CHOD, CHOBVibrio anguillarumFish Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)Hemorrhagic septicemia
  • Isolation of new phages from bivalve samples purchased in the central market of Santiago, Chile

  • The phages exhibited ability to infect both V. anguillarum and V. ordalii but not V. parahaemolyticus strains

  • In both experimental tanks and fish farm assays, the CHOED phage was able to protect Salmo salar against experimentally induced vibriosis

[113]
vB_VspP_pVa5 (N4-like podovirus)Vibrio splendidusFish and bivalvesSevere epizootics Skin Ulceration Syndrome (SUS)
  • Isolation of a new phage from a sea-cage aquaculture farm in Greece with a very specific host range infecting only the bacterial host

  • The phage showed an intense bactericidal activity being proposed as a potential candidate for phage cocktails, suitable for the biological control of V. splendidus

[114]
pVco-14 (Siphoviridae)Vibrio coralliilyticusPacific oyster larvae (Crassostrea gigas)Massive mortality of Pacific oyster larvae

  • Isolation of a new phage from the sewage at the oyster hatchery located at Tongyeong, Korea that specifically infects V. coralliilyticus

  • Oyster larvae pre-treated with phage pVco-14 before the bacterial challenge exhibited significantly higher survival rate when compared to the untreated groups
[115]
ValLY-3, VspDsh-1, VspSw-1, VpaJT-1, and ValSw4-1 (Siphoviridae)Vibrio sp. Va-F3 strainShrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)Vibriosis
  • Isolation of new phages from wastewater samples collected from sewage draining exits in the cities of Shenzhen, Zhanjiang, and Shanwei, China

  • A workflow of preparing a phage cocktail was described: the phage cocktail preparation showed in vitro higher efficiency in inhibiting the growth of Vibrio sp. Va-F3 than any single phage

  • In in situ experiments, the survival rate of the group of shrimp treated with the cocktail was comparable to that of the group treated with antibiotics
[116]
Different bacteriophagesAeromonas hydrophila and Edwardsiella tardaJapanese eel (Anguilla Japonica)Hemorrhagic septicaemia and edwardsiellosis
  • Isolation of new phages from water samples in southern Taiwan
  • In pure culture, the phages decreased the bacterial host by three orders of magnitude after two hours

  • In pond water, phage treatment reduced 250-fold the A. hydrophila population in 8 h, while phage population increased

[117]
Φ2, Φ5 (Myoviridae)Aeromonas hydrophilaCatfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)Motile Aeromonas Septicemia (MAS)
  • Isolation of new phages from water samples from the Saigon River of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • Phages exhibited broad activity spectra, including multiple-antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas isolates

  • Phage treatments applied to infected catfish resulted in a significant increase in the survival rates when compared to control experiments
[118]
Akh-2 (Siphoviridae)Aeromonas hydrophilaLoach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatu)Septicemia
  • Isolation of a new phage from water collected from Wahyeon Beach, Geoje Island, South Korea
  • In an experiment where the disease was artificially induced, loach treated with phage Akh-2 exhibited an increased survival rate as compared with the untreated control
[119]
HER 110 (Myoviridae)Aeromonas salmonicida HER 1107 strainBrook trout (Oncorhynchus fontinalis) formerly, (Salvelinus fontinalis)Furunculosis

  • In aquarium assays, treatment with phage HER 110 declined the population of A. salmonicida in 3 days and additionally, the onset of furunculosis in brook trout was delayed by 7 days.

  • Different phages were active against A. salmonicida HER 1107. The mutants that developed resistance to phage HER 110 were sensitive to other phages

[120]
PAS-1Aeromonas salmonicidaRainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Furunculosis

  • The phage showed in vitro efficient bacteriolytic activity against A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida strain AS05

  • In tank experiments, the administration of phage PAS-1 to A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida-infected rainbow trout exhibited notable protective effects, increasing survival rates and mean times to death

[121]
AS-A AS-D AS-E Cocktails combining two or three phagesAeromonas salmonicida-Furunculosis
  • Isolation of new phages from sewage network of Aveiro, Portugal
  • Phage cocktails developed

  • Phage cocktails reduced the population of A. salmonicida faster than single suspensions and decreased the development of phage-resistant mutants. Because of this, they were proposed to be used to control furunculosis in aquaculture

[122]
ETP-1 (Podoviridae)Multidrug resistant Edwardsiella tardaZebrafish (Danio rerio)Edwardsiellosis
  • Isolation of a new phage from marine fish farm water in Jeju Island, Korea

  • Effective against multidrug-resistant E. tarda

  • When zebrafish was bath exposed for 12 days to phage ETP-1, and simultaneously challenged with E. tarda, the survival rate in phage-exposed fish was higher than that found in the control until 4 days post challenge

[103]
ΦeiDWF, ΦeiAU, ΦeiMSLS (Siphoviridae)Edwardsiella ictaluriCatfishEnteric septicemia
  • Isolation of new phages from geographically distant aquaculture ponds at different times
  • According to the genomic analysis, the phages are members of a lineage highly stable over time and geographic regions.
  • The genome analysis also revealed that the virus were virulent phages lacking lysogeny capacity, which will facilitate therapeutic applications
[123]
FpV-1 to FpV-22: FpV2, FpV4 (Podoviridae) FpV7, FpV9, FpV10 (Siphoviridae) FpV14, FpV19 (Myoviridae)Flavobacterium psychrophilumRainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and other species of troutsRainbow trout fry syndrome (RTFS) and bacterial coldwater disease (CWD)
  • Isolation of new phages from Danish rainbow trout farms, both with and without outbreaks of RTFS when the samples were taken

  • The phages showed a broad-host-range with a strong lytic potential against a large number of pathogenic F. psychrophilum host strains, indicating that they could have potential in the treatment of RTFS and CWD

[124]
PFpW-3, PFpC-Y (Myoviridae) PFpW-6, PFpW-7 (Podoviridae) PFpW-8 (Siphoviridae) Flavobacterium psychrophilumAyu fish (Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis)Systemic bacterial coldwater disease (CWD)
  • Isolation of new phages from ayu kidneys and pond water collected from Japanese ayu farms

  • Among the phages, in in vitro assays, PFpW-3 displayed high infectivity for F. psychrophilum isolated from ayu and from other fish, indicating that it could have interest for the treatment of CWD in Japanese ayu farms

[125]
FCP1–FCP9 FCP1 (Podovariedae)Flavobacterium columnareCatfish (Clarias batrachus)Columnaris disease
  • Isolation of new phages from the water and the bottom sediments of various geo-climatic regions of North India

  • When C. batrachus was treated with a virulent bacterial isolate and with phage FCP1 (applied via intramuscular, immersion, and oral), a significant decrease in host bacterium in sera, gill, liver, and kidney of challenged fishes was observed

  • Phage treatment resulted in disappearance of gross symptoms and 100% survival in experimentally infected C. batrachus

[126]

Entries are grouped according to the pathogenic species, and the works related to the same species were ordered chronologically.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, design and writing-original draft preparation, C.S.; Screening of databases, selection of articles, critical analysis and preparation of tables and figures, C.S., L.A.-H., Á.P.-G., R.A.-G., T.d.M., S.S. and T.G.V.; Writing-critical review and editing T.G.V. and Á.S.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1. Wommack, K.E.; Colwell, R.R. Virioplankton: Viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 69-114.

2. Simmonds, P.; Adams, M.J.; Benko, M.; Breitbart, M.; Brister, J.R.; Carstens, E.B.; Davison, A.J.; Delwart, E.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Harrach, B.; et al. Consensus statement: Virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 161-168.

3. Adriaenssens, E.M.; Wittmann, J.; Kuhn, J.H.; Dann Turner, D.; Sullivan, M.B.; Dutilh, B.-E.; Jang, H.B.; Zyl, L.J.V.; Klumpp, J.; Lobocka, M.; et al. Taxonomy of prokaryotic viruses: 2017 update from the ICTV Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses Subcommittee. Arch. Virol. 2018, 166, 1125-1129.

4. Barylski, J.; Enault, F.; Dutilh, B.E.; Schuller, M.B.; Edwards, R.A.; Gillis, A.; Klumpp, J.; Knezevic, P.; Krupovic, M.; Kuhn, J.H.; et al. Taxonomy proposal to create one (1) new family, Herelleviridae, in the order Caudovirales. In ICTV Online: International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV); International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV): London, UK, 2018; p. 2018.118B.

5. Walker, P.J.; Siddell, S.G.; Lekowitz, E.J.; Mushegian, A.R.; Dempsey, D.M.; Dutilh, B.E.; Harrach, B.; Harrision, R.L.; Hendrickson, R.C.; Junglen, S.; et al. Changes to virus taxonomy and International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 2417-2429.

6. Rakonjac, J.; Bennett, N.J.; Spagnuolo, J.; Gagic, D.; Russel, M. Filamentous bacteriophage: Biology, phage display and nanotechnology applications. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2011, 13, 51-76.

7. Cenens, W.; Makumi, A.; Mebrhatu, M.T.; Lavigne, R.; Aertsen, A. Phage-host interactions during pseudolysogeny: Lessons from the Pid/dgo interaction. Bacteriophage 2013, 3, e25029.

8. Villa, T.G.; Veiga-Crespo, P. Enzybiotics: Antibiotic Enzymes as Drugs and Therapeutics; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010.

9. Hankin, E.H. An outbreak of cholera in an officers' mess. Br. Med. J. 1896, 2, 1817-1819.

10. Twort, F. An investigation on the nature of ultra-microscopic viruses. Lancet 1915, 186, 1241-1243.

11. D'Hérelle, F. Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysentériques. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 1917, 165, 373-375.

12. Summers, W.C. Bacteriophage research: Early history. In Bacteriophages: Biology and Applications; Kutter, E., Sulakvelidze, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005.

13. Brunoghe, R.; Maisin, J. Essais de therapeutique au moyen du bacteriophage du staphylocoque. C. R. Soc. Biol. 1921, 85, 1120-1121.

14. Sulakvelidze, A.; Alavidze, Z.; Morris, J.G. Bacteriophage therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 649-659.

15. Abedon, S.T.; Kuhl, S.J.; Blasdel, B.G.; Kutter, E.M. Phage treatment of human infections. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 66-85.

16. El-Shibiny, A.; El-Sahhar, S. Bacteriophages: The possible solution to treat infections caused by pathogenic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 865-879.

17. Mallmann, W.L.; Hemstreet, C.J. Isolation of an inhibitory substance from plants. Agric. Res. 1924, 69, 599-602.

18. Moore, E.S. d'Herelle's bacteriophage in relation to plant parasites. S. Afr. J. Sci. 1926, 23, 306.

19. Coons, G.; Kotila, J. The transmissible lytic principle (bacteriophage) in relation to plant pathogens. Phytopathology. 1925, 15, 357-370.

20. Kotila, J.E.; Coons, G.H. Investigations on the Blackleg Disease of Potato; Michigan State University. Agricultural Experiment Station: Urbana, IL, USA, 1925; pp. 3-29.

21. Massey, R.E. Studies on blackarm disease of cotton III. Empire Cotton Grow. Rev. 1934, 11, 188-193.

22. Kutateladze, M.; Adamia, R. Bacteriophages as potential new therapeutics or supplement antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 591-595.

23. Chanishvili, N. Literature Review of the Practical Application of Bacteriophage Research; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012.

24. Okabe, N.; Goto, M. Bacteriophages of plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1963, 1, 397-418.

25. Sundin, G.W.; Wang, N. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 161-180.

26. La Torre, A.; Iovino, V.; Caradonia, F. Copper implant protection: Current situation and prospects. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 201-236.

27. Amador, P.; Duarte, I.; da Costa, R.P.; Fernandes, R.; Prudêncio, C. Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae From Agricultural Manure and Soil in Portugal. Soil Sci. 2017, 182, 292-301.

28. Vivas, R.; Barbosa, A.A.T.; Dolabela, S.S.; Jain, S. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Alternative Methods to Control Them: An Overview. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 890-908.

29. Richard, D.; Tribot, N.; Boyer, C.; Terville, M.; Boyer, K.; Javegny, S.; Roux-Cuvelier, M.; Pruvost, O. First report of copper-resistant Xanthomonas citri pv. citri Pathotype a causing Asiatic citrus canker in Réunion, France. Plant. Dis. 2016, 101, 503.

30. Colombi, E.; Straub, C.; Künzel, S.; Templeton, M.D.; McCann, H.C.; Rainey, P.B. Evolution of copper resistance in the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae through acquisition of integrative conjugative elements and plasmids. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 819-832.

31. Chevrette, M.G.; Currie, C.R. Emerging evolutionary paradigms in antibiotic discovery. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 257-271.

32. Dunleavy, J.M.; Urs, N.V.R. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophage SBX-1 and its bacterial host, both endemic in soybeans. J. Virol. 1973, 12, 188.

33. Meaden, S.; Koskella, B. Exploring the risks of phage application in the environment. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 358.

34. Kolozsvári, N.J.; Király, L.; Schwarczinger, I. Phage therapy for plant disease control with a focus on fire blight. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2012, 7, 1-12.

35. Buttimer, C.; McAuliffe, O.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C.; O'Mahony, J.; Coffey, A. Bacteriophages and Bacterial Plant Diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 34.

36. Kering, K.K.; Kibii, B.J.; Wei, H. Biocontrol of phytobacteria with bacteriophage cocktails. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1775-1781.

37. Breezea, T.D.; Baileyb, A.P.; Balcombec, K.G.; Pottsa, S.G. Pollination services in the UK: How important are honeybees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 142, 137-143.

38. Santos, S.B.; Oliveira, A.; Melo, L.D.R.; Azeredo, J. Identification of the first endolysin Cell Binding Domain (CBD) targeting Paenibacillus larvae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2568.

39. Brady, T.S.; Merrill, B.D.; Hilton, J.A.; Payne, A.M.; Stephenson, M.B.; Hope, S. Bacteriophages as an alternative to conventional antibiotic use for the prevention or treatment of Paenibacillus larvae in honeybee hives. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 150, 94-100.

40. Ribeiro, H.G.; Melo, L.D.R.; Oliveira, H.; Boon, M.; Lavigne, R.; Noben, J.-P.; Azeredo, J.; Oliveira, A. Characterization of a new podovirus infecting Paenibacillus larvae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20355.

41. Tsourkas, P.K. Paenibacillus larvae bacteriophages: Obscure past, promising future. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6, e000329.

42. Nakai, T.; Park, S.C. Bacteriophage therapy of infectious diseases in aquaculture. Res. Microbiol. 2002, 153, 13-18.

43. Almeida, A.; Cunha, A.; Gomes, N.C.; Alves, E.; Costa, L.; Faustino, A.F.M. Phage therapy and photodynamic therapy: Low environmental impact approaches to inactivate microorganisms in fish farming plants. Mar. Drugs 2009, 7, 268-313.

44. Muroga, K. Viral and bacterial diseases of marine fish and shellfish in Japanese hatcheries. Aquaculture 2001, 202, 23-44.

45. Oliveira, J.; Castilho, F.; Cunha, A.; Pereira, M.J. Bacteriophage therapy as a bacterial control strategy in aquaculture. Aquacult. Int. 2012, 20, 879-910.

46. Hektoen, H.; Berge, J.A.; Hormazabal, V.; Yndestad, M. Persistence of antibacterial agents in marine sediments. Aquaculture 1995, 133, 175-184.

47. Defoirdt, T.; Sorgeloos, P.; Bossier, P. Alternatives to antibiotics for the control of bacterial disease in aquaculture. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 251-258.

48. Sapkota, A.; Sapkota, A.R.; Kucharski, M.; Burke, J.; McKenzie, S.; Walker, P.; Lawrence, R. Aquaculture practices and potential human health risks: Current knowledge and future priorities. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 1215-1226.

49. Nakai, T.; Sugimoto, R.; Park, K.H.; Matsuoka, S.; Mori, K.; Nishioka, T.; Maruyama, K. Protective effects of bacteriophage on experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in yellowtail. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 1999, 37, 33-41.

50. Richards, G.P. Bacteriophage remediation of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture: A review of the technology. Bacteriophage 2014, 4, e975540.

51. Letchumanan, V.; Chan, K.; Pusparajah, P.; Saokaew, S.; Duangjai, A.; Goh, B.; Mutalib, N.; Lee, L. Insights into Bacteriophage Application in Controlling Vibrio Species. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1114.

52. Kalatzis, P.G.; Castillo, D.; Katharios, P.; Middelboe, M. Bacteriophage Interactions with Marine Pathogenic Vibrios: Implications for Phage Therapy. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 15.

53. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430-439.

54. Lindsey, A.; Murugan, S.; Renitta, R.E. Microbial disease management in agriculture: Current status and future prospects. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101468.

55. Mansfield, J.; Genin, S.; Magori, S.; Citovsky, V.; Sriariyanum, M.; Ronald, P.; Dow, M.; Verdier, V.; Beer, S.V.; Machado, M.A.; et al. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2012, 13, 614-629.

56. Sundin, G.W.; Castiblanco, L.F.; Yuan, X.; Zeng, Q.; Yang, C.H. Bacterial disease management: Challenges, experience, innovation and future prospects in molecular and plant pathology. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2016, 17, 1506-1518.

57. Demayo, A.; Taylor, M.C.; Taylor, K.W.; Wiersma, G.B. Effects of copper on humans, laboratory and farm animals, terrestrial plants, and aquatic life. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 2009, 12, 183-255.

58. Grenni, P.; Ancona, V.; Caracciolo, A.B. Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review. Microchem. J. 2018, 136, 25-39.

59. Bender, C.L.; Malvick, D.K.; Conway, K.E.; George, S.; Cooksey, D.A. Characterization of pXv10A, a copper resistance plasmid in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 170-175.

60. Basim, H.; Stall, R.E.; Minsavage, G.V.; Jones, J.B. Chromosomal gene transfer by conjugation in the plant pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 1044-1049.

61. Lamichhane, J.R.; Osdaghi, E.; Behlau, F.; Köhl, J.; Jones, J.; Aubertot, J.N. Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 28.

62. Thayer, P.L.; Stall, R.E. A survey of Xanthomonas vesicatoria resistance to streptomycin. Proc. Fla. Hortic. Soc. 1961, 75, 163-165.

63. Tancos, K.A.; Villani, S.; Kuehne, S.; Borejsza-Wysocka, E.; Breth, D.; Carol, J.; Aldwinckle, H.S.; Cox, K.D. Prevalence of streptomycin-resistant Erwinia amylovora in New York apple orchards. Plant. Dis. 2016, 100, 802-809.

64. Meek, R.W.; Vyas, H.; Piddock, L.J.V. Nonmedical Uses of Antibiotics: Time to Restrict Their Use? PLoS Biol. 2015, 13, e1002266.

65. Zaman, S.B.; Hussain, M.A.; Nye, R.; Mehta, V.; Mamun, K.T.; Hossain, N. A Review on Antibiotic Resistance: Alarm Bells are Ringing. Cureus 2017, 9, e1403.

66. Chen, Q.L.; Cui, H.L.; Su, J.Q.; Penuelas, J.; Zhu, Y.G. Antibiotic Resistomes in Plant Microbiomes. Trends Plant. Sci. 2019, 24, 530-541.

67. Jess, S.; Kildea, S.; Moody, A.; Rennick, G.; Murchie, A.K.; Cooke, L.R. European Union policy on pesticides: Implications for agriculture in Ireland. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1646-1654.

68. López-Seijas, J.; García-Fraga, B.; da Silva, A.F.; Sieiro, C. Wine Lactic Acid Bacteria with Antimicrobial Activity as Potential Biocontrol Agents against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Agronomy 2020, 10, 31.

69. Ab Rahman, S.F.S.; Singh, E.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Schenk, P.M. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant. Sci. 2017, 267, 102-111.

70. McKenna, F.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Hardy, G.E.S.J.; Dell, B. Novel in vivo use of a polyvalent Streptomyces phage to disinfest Streptomyces scabies-infected seed potatoes. Plant. Pathol. 2001, 50, 666-675.

71. Adriaenssens, E.M.; VanVaerenbergh, J.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Dunon, V.; Ceyssens, P.J.; De Proft, M.; Kropinski, A.M.; Noben, J.P.; Maes, M.; Lavigne, R. T4-related bacteriophage LIMEstone isolates for the control of soft rot on potato caused by 'Dickeya solani'. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33227.

72. Czajkowski, R.; Ozymko, Z.; Lojkowska, E. Isolation and characterization of novel soilborne lytic bacteriophages infecting Dickeya spp. biovar 3 ("D. solani"). Plant. Pathol. 2014, 63, 758-772.

73. Czajkowski, R.; Ozymko, Z.; de Jager, V.; Siwinska, J.; Smolarska, A.; Ossowicki, A.; Narajczyk, M.; Lojkowska, E. Genomic, proteomic and morphological characterization of two novel broad host lytic bacteriophages ΦPD10.3 and ΦPD23.1 infecting pectinolytic Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 3.

74. Wei, C.; Liu, J.; Maina, A.N.; Mwaura, F.B.; Yu, J.; Yan, C.; Zhang, R. Developing a bacteriophage cocktail for biocontrol of potato bacterial wilt. Virol. Sin. 2017, 32, 476-484.

75. Buttimer, C.; Hendrix, H.; Lucid, A.; Neve, H.; Noben, J.P.; Franz, C.; O'Mahony, J.; Lavigne, R.; Coffey, A. Novel N4-Like bacteriophages of Pectobacterium atrosepticum. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 45.

76. Carstens, A.B.; Djurhuus, A.M.; Kot, W.; Jacobs-Sera, D.; Hatfull, G.F.; Hansen, L.H. Unlocking the potential of 46 new bacteriophages for biocontrol of Dickeya solani. Viruses 2018, 10, 621.

77. Muturi, P.; Yu, J.; Maina, A.N.; Kariuki, S.; Mwaura, F.B.; Wei, H. Bacteriophages Isolated in China for the Control of Pectobacterium carotovorum causing Potato Soft Rot in Kenya. Virol. Sin. 2019, 34, 287-294.

78. Flaherty, J.E.; Somodi, G.C.; Jones, J.B.; Harbaugh, B.K.; Jackson, L.E. Control of Bacterial Spot on Tomato in the Greenhouse and Field with H-mutant Bacteriophages. HortScience 2000, 35, 882-884.

79. Balogh, B.; Jones, J.B.; Momol, M.T.; Olson, S.M.; Obradovic, A.; King, P.; Jackson, L.E. Improved efficacy of newly formulated bacteriophages for management of bacterial spot on tomato. Plant. Dis. 2003, 87, 949-954.

80. Obradovic, A.; Jones, J.B.; Momol, M.T.; Balogh, B.; Olson, S.M. Management of tomato bacterial spot in the field by foliar applications of bacteriophages and SAR inducers. Plant. Dis. 2004, 88, 736-740.

81. Fujiwara, A.; Fujisawa, M.; Hamasaki, R.; Kawasaki, T.; Fujie, M.; Yamada, T. Biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum by treatment with lytic bacteriophages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4155-4162.

82. Bae, J.Y.; Wu, J.; Lee, H.J.; Jo, E.J.; Murugaiyan, S.; Chung, E.; Lee, S.W. Biocontrol Potential of a Lytic Bacteriophage PE204 against Bacterial Wilt of Tomato. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 1613-1620.

83. Goyer, C. Isolation and characterization of phages Stsc1 and Stsc3 infecting Streptomyces scabiei and their potential as biocontrol agents. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 2005, 27, 210-216.

84. Lang, J.M.; Gent, D.H.; Schwartz, H.F. Management of Xanthomonas leaf blight of onion with bacteriophages and a plant activator. Plant. Dis. 2007, 91, 871-878.

85. Lim, J.A.; Jee, S.; Lee, D.H.; Roh, E.; Jung, K.; Oh, C.; Heu, S. Biocontrol of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum using bacteriophage PP1. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 1147-1153.

86. Rombouts, S.; Volckaert, A.; Venneman, S.; Declercq, B.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Allonsius, C.N.; Van Malderghem, C.; Jang, H.B.; Briers, Y.; Noben, J.P.; et al. Characterization of novel bacteriophages for bio-control of bacterial blight in leek caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. porri. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 279.

87. Ranjani, P.; Gowthami, Y.; Gnanamanickam, S.S.; Palani, P. Bacteriophages: A New Weapon for the Control of Bacterial Blight Disease in Rice Caused by Xanthomonas oryzae. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 46, 346-359.

88. Balogh, B.; Canteros, B.I.; Stall, R.E.; Jones, J.B. Control of citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot with bacteriophages. Plant. Dis. 2008, 92, 1048-1052.

89. Boulé, J.; Sholberg, P.L.; Lehman, S.M.; O'gorman, D.T.; Svircev, A.M. Isolation and characterization of eight bacteriophages infecting Erwinia amylovora and their potential as biological control agents in British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 2011, 33, 308-317.

90. Das, M.; Bhowmick, T.S.; Ahern, S.J.; Young, R.; Gonzalez, C.F. Control of pierce's disease by phage. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128902.

91. Yu, J.G.; Lim, J.A.; Song, Y.R.; Heu, S.; Kim, G.H.; Koh, Y.J.; Oh, C.S. Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Causing Bacterial Canker Disease in Kiwifruit. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 385-393.

92. Pinheiro, L.A.M.; Pereira, C.M.; Barreal, M.E.; Gallego, P.P.; Balcão, V.M.; Almeida, A. Use of phage ϕ6 to inactivate Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in kiwifruit plants: In vitro and ex vivo experiments. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1319-1330.

93. Ni, P.; Wang, L.; Deng, B.; Jiu, S.; Ma, C.; Zhang, C.; Almeida, A.; Wang, D.; Xu, W.; Wang, S. Combined application of bacteriophages and carvacrol in the control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae planktonic and biofilm forms. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 837.

94. Nguyen, H.T.; Yoon, S.; Kim, M.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Yoon, M.Y.; Cho, Y.H.; Lim, Y.; Shin, S.H.; Kim, D.E. Characterization of bacteriophage φPto-bp6g, a novel phage that lyses Pseudomonas tolaasii causing brown blotch disease in mushrooms. J. Microbiol. Methods 2012, 91, 514-519.

95. Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unites Nations (FAO). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All. 2016. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf (accessed on 6 May 2020).

96. Plaza, N.; Castillo, D.; Pérez-Reytor, D.; Higuera, G.; García, K.; Bastías, R. Bacteriophages in the control of pathogenic vibrios. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 31, 24-33.

97. Cabello, F.C.; Godfrey, H.P.; Tomava, A.; Ivanova, L.; Dölz, H.; Millanao, A.; Buschamann, A.H. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: Its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1917-1942.

98. Watts, J.E.M.; Schreier, H.J.; Lanska, L.; Hale, M.S. The rising tide of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: Sources, sinks and solutions. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 158.

99. World Health Organization (WHO). Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. 2014. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112642/9789241564748_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D6530529B3B36FE8EEAF9A19CFD718AB?sequence=1 (accessed on 6 May 2020).

100. Falaise, C.; Francois, C.; Travers, M.A.; Morga, B.; Haure, J.; Tremblay, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pasetto, P.; Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial compounds from eukaryotic microalgae against human pathogens and diseases in aquaculture. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 159.

101. Pérez-Sánchez, T.; Mora-Sánchez, B.; Balcázar, J.L. Biological Approaches for Disease Control in Aquaculture: Advantages, Limitations and Challenges. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 897-903.

102. Soliman, W.S.; Shaapan, R.M.; Mohamed, L.A.; Gayed, S.S.R. Recent biocontrol measures for fish bacterial diseases, in particular to probiotics, bio-encapsulated vaccines, and phage therapy. Open Vet. J. 2019, 9, 190-195.

103. Nikapitiya, C.; Chandrarathna, H.P.S.U.; Dananjaya, S.H.S.; De Zoysa, M.; Lee, J. Isolation and characterization of phage (ETP-1) specific to multidrug resistant pathogenic Edwardsiella tarda and its in vivo biocontrol efficacy in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Biologicals 2020, 63, 14-23.

104. Matamp, N.; Bhat, S.G. Phage Endolysins as Potential Antimicrobials against Multidrug Resistant Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus: Current Status of Research and Challenges Ahead. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 84.

105. Park, S.C.; Nakai, T. Bacteriophage control of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2003, 53, 33-39.

106. Karunasagar, I.; Shivu, M.M.; Girisha, S.K.; Krohne, G.; Karunasagar, I. Biocontrol of pathogens in shrimp hatcheries using bacteriophages. Aquaculture 2007, 268, 288-292.

107. Shivu, M.M.; Rajeeva, B.C.; Girisha, S.K.; Karunasagar, I.; Krohne, G.; Karunasagar, I. Molecular characterization of Vibrio harveyi bacteriophages isolated from aquaculture environments along the coast of India. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 322-331.

108. Crothers-Stomps, C.; Hoj, L.; Bourne, D.G.; Hall, M.R.; Owens, L. Isolation of lytic bacteriophage against Vibrio harveyi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 1744-1750.

109. Wang, Y.; Barton, M.; Elliott, L.; Li, X.; Abraham, S.; O'Dea, M.; Munro, J. Bacteriophage therapy for the control of Vibrio harveyi in greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata). Aquaculture 2017, 473, 251-258.

110. Jun, J.W.; Kim, H.J.; Yun, S.K.; Chai, J.Y.; Park, S.C. Eating oysters without risk of vibriosis: Application of a bacteriophage against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2014, 188, 31-35.

111. Yang, M.; Liang, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Ye, Y.; Gao, X.; Wu, Q.; Tan, Z. Isolation and Characterization of the Novel Phages vB_VpS_BA3 and vB_VpS_CA8 for Lysing Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 259.

112. Matamp, N.; Bhat, S.G. Genome characterization of novel lytic Myoviridae bacteriophage ϕVP-1 enhances its applicability against MDR-biofilm-forming Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 387-396.

113. Higuera, G.; Bastías, R.; Tsertsvadze, G.; Romero, J.; Espejo, R.T. Recently discovered Vibrio anguillarum phages can protect against experimentally induced Vibriosis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquaculture 2013, 392, 128-133.

114. Katharios, P.; Kalatzis, P.G.; Kokkari, C.; Sarropoulou, E.; Middelboe, M. Isolation and characterization of a N4-like lytic bacteriophage infecting Vibrio splendidus, a pathogen of fish and bivalves. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0190083.

115. Kim, H.J.; Jun, J.W.; Giri, S.S.; Chi, C.; Yun, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, J.W.; Han, S.J.; Kwon, J.; et al. Application of the bacteriophage pVco-14 to prevent Vibrio coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. J. Invert. Pathol. 2019, 167, 107244.

116. Chen, L.; Fan, J.; Yan, T.; Liu, Q.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Deng, D.; Huang, S.; Ma, Y. Isolation and Characterization of Specific Phages to Prepare a Cocktail Preventing Vibrio sp. Va-F3 Infections in Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2337.

117. Hsu, C.H.; Lo, C.Y.; Liu, J.K.; Lin, C.S. Control of the eel (Anguilla japonica) pathogens, Aeromonas hydrophila and Edwardsiella tarda, by bacteriophages. J. Fish. Soc. Taiwan 2000, 27, 21-31.

118. Le, T.S.; Nguyen, T.H.; Vo, H.P.; Doan, V.C.; Nguyen, H.L.; Tran, M.T.; Tran, T.T.; Southgate, P.C.; Kurtböke, D.I. Protective Effects of Bacteriophages against Aeromonas hydrophila Causing Motile Aeromonas Septicemia (MAS) in Striped Catfish. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 16.

119. Akmal, M.; Rahimi-Midani, A.; Hafeez-ur-Rehman, M.; Hussain, A.; Choi, T.J. Isolation, Characterization, and Application of a Bacteriophage Infecting the Fish Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Pathogens 2020, 9, 215.

120. Imbeault, S.; Parent, S.; Lagace, M.; Uhland, C.F.; Blais, J.F. Using bacteriophages to prevent furunculosis caused by Aeromonas salmonicida in farmed Brook Trout. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2006, 18, 203-214.

121. Kim, J.H.; Choresca, C.H.; Shin, S.P.; Han, J.E.; Jun, J.W.; Park, S.C. Biological Control of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Using Aeromonas Phage PAS-1. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 81-86.

122. Duarte, J.; Pereira, C.; Moreirinha, C.; Salvio, R.; Lopes, A.; Wang, D.; Almeida, A. New insights on phage efficacy to control Aeromonas salmonicida in aquaculture systems: An in vitro preliminary study. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 970-982.

123. Carrias, A.; Welch, T.J.; Waldbieser, G.C.; Mead, D.A.; Terhune, J.S.; Liles, M.R. Comparative genomic analysis of bacteriophages specific to the channel catfish pathogen. Edwardsiella ictaluri. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 6.

124. Stenholm, A.R.; Dalsgaard, I.; Middelboe, M. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4070-4078.

125. Kim, J.H.; Gomez, D.K.; Nakai, T.; Park, S.C. Isolation and identification of bacteriophages infecting ayu Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis specific Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 109-115.

126. Prasad, Y.; Kumar, D.A.; Sharma, A.K. Lytic bacteriophages specific to Flavobacterium columnare rescue catfish, Clarias batrachus (Linn.) from columnaris disease. J. Environ. Biol. 2011, 32, 161-168.

127. Iriarte, F.; Balogh, B.; Momol, M.T.; Smith, L.M.; Wilson, M.; Jones, J.B. Factors affecting survival of bacteriophage on tomato leaf surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1704-1711.

128. Iriarte, F.; Obradovic, A.; Wernsing, M.H.; Jackson, L.E.; Balogh, B.; Hong, J.A.; Momol, M.T.; Jones, J.B.; Vallad, G.E. Soil-based systemic delivery and phyllosphere in vivo propagation of bacteriophages: Two possible strategies for improving bacteriophage persistence for plant disease control. Bacteriophage 2012, 2, 215-224.

129. Sandeep, K. Bacteriophage precision drug against bacterial infections. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90, 631-633.

130. Summers, W.C. Bacteriophage therapy. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 55, 437-451.

131. Nakai, T. References. In Bacteriophages in the Control of Food- and Waterborne Pathogens; Sabour, P.M., Griffiths, P.M., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 257-272. ISBN 978-1-55581-502-8.

132. Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T.; Loc-Carrillo, C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 769-783.

133. Koskella, B.; Taylor, T.B. Multifaceted impacts of bacteriophages in the plant microbiome. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 361-380.

134. García, R.; Latz, S.; Romero, J.; Higuera, G.; Gastón, H.; García, K.; Bastías, R. Bacteriophage production models: An overview. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1187.

135. Zhang, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhang, H.; Watts, A.B.; Ghosh, D. Manufacturing and ambient stability of shelf freeze dried bacteriophage poder formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 542, 1-7.

136. Fauconnier, A. Phage Therapy Regulation: From Night to Dawn. Viruses 2019, 11, 352.

137. Oechslin, F. Resistance Development to Bacteriophages Occurring during Bacteriophage Therapy. Viruses 2018, 10, 351.

138. Weinbauer, M.G. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 127-181.

139. Scott, A.E.; Timms, A.R.; Connerton, P.L.; Carrillo, C.L.; Radzum, K.A.; Connerton, I.F. Genome dynamics of Campylobacter jejuni in response to bacteriophage predation. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, 1142-1151.

140. Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317-327.

141. Tanji, Y.; Shimada, T.; Yoichi, M.; Miyanaga, K.; Hori, K.; Unno, H. Toward rational control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by a phage cocktail. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 270-274.

142. Barrow, P.A.; Soothill, J.S. Bacteriophage therapy and prophylaxis: Rediscovery and renewed assessment of potential. Trends Microbiol. 1997, 5, 268-271.

143. Wendling, C.C.; Piecyk, A.; Refardt, D.; Chibani, C.; Hertel, R.; Liesegang, H.; Bunk, B.; Overmann, J.; Roth, O. Tripartite species interaction: Eukaryotic hosts suffer more from phage susceptible than from phage resistant bacteria. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 98.

144. Laanto, E.; Bamford, J.K.H.; Laakso, J.; Sundberg, L.R. Phage-driven loss of virulence in a fish pathogenic bacterium. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e53157.

145. Castillo, D.; Christiansen, R.H.; Dalsgaard, I.; Madsen, L.; Middelboe, M. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms in the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum: Linking genomic mutations to changes in bacterial virulence factors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 1157-1167.

146. Rørbo, N.; Rønneseth, A.; Kalatzis, P.G.; Rasmussen, B.B.; Engell-Sørensen, K.; Kleppen, H.P.; Wergeland, H.I.; Gram, L.; Middelboe, M. Exploring the effect of phage therapy in preventing Vibrio anguillarum infections in cod and turbot larvae. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 42.

147. Tovkach, F.I. A study of Erwinia carotovora phage resistance with the use of temperate bacteriophage ZF40. Microbiology 2002, 71, 72-78.

148. Evans, T.J.; Ind, A.; Komitopoulou, E.; Salmond, G.P. Phage-selected lipopolysaccharide mutants of Pectobacterium atrosepticum exhibit different impacts on virulence. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 505-514.

149. Park, S.C.; Shimamura, I.; Fukunaga, M.; Mori, K.; Nakai, T. Isolation of bacteriophages specific to a fish pathogen, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, as a candidate for disease control. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1416-1422.

150. Matsuoka, S.; Hashizume, T.; Kanzaki, H.; Iwamoto, E.; Chang, P.S.; Yoshida, T.; Nakai, T. Phage therapy against beta-hemolytic streptococcicosis of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish. Pathol. 2007, 42, 181-189.

151. Parmar, K.M.; Hathi, Z.J.; Dafale, N.A. Control of Multidrug-Resistant Gene Flow in the Environment through Bacteriophage Intervention. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 1007-1029.

152. Gu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Han, W.; Lei, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gao, Y.; Song, J.; Lu, R.; et al. A Method for Generation Phage Cocktail with GreatTherapeutic Potential. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31696.

153. Kilcher, S.; Loessner, M.J. Engineering Bacteriophages as Versatile Biologics. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 355-367.

Carmen Sieiro1,*, Lara Areal-Hermida1, Ángeles Pichardo-Gallardo1, Raquel Almuiña-González1, Trinidad de Miguel2, Sandra Sánchez2, Ángeles Sánchez-Pérez3 and Tomás G. Villa2,*

1Department of Functional Biology and Health Sciences, Microbiology Area, University of Vigo, Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain

2Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 5706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

3Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydnay NSN 2006, Australia

*Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Word count: 12333

Show less

© 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Agriculture, together with aquaculture, supplies most of the foodstuffs required by the world human population to survive. Hence, bacterial diseases affecting either agricultural crops, fish, or shellfish not only cause large economic losses to producers but can even create food shortages, resulting in malnutrition, or even famine, in vulnerable populations. Years of antibiotic use in the prevention and the treatment of these infections have greatly contributed to the emergence and the proliferation of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This review addresses the urgent need for alternative strategies for the use of antibiotics, focusing on the use of bacteriophages (phages) as biocontrol agents. Phages are viruses that specifically infect bacteria; they are highly host-specific and represent an environmentally-friendly alternative to antibiotics to control and kill pathogenic bacteria. The information evaluated here highlights the effectiveness of phages in the control of numerous major pathogens that affect both agriculture and aquaculture, with special emphasis on scientific and technological aspects still requiring further development to establish phagotherapy as a real universal alternative to antibiotic treatment.

Details

Title
A Hundred Years of Bacteriophages: Can Phages Replace Antibiotics in Agriculture and Aquaculture?
Author
Sieiro, Carmen  VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Areal-Hermida, Lara; Pichardo-Gallardo, Ángeles; Almuiña-González, Raquel; Trinidad de Miguel  VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sánchez, Sandra  VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sánchez-Pérez, Ángeles; Villa, Tomás G  VIAFID ORCID Logo 
First page
493
Publication year
2020
Publication date
2020
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
20796382
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080493
ProQuest document ID
2432723059
Copyright
© 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.