It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The ability to respond appropriately to challenges is an important contributor to fitness. Variation in the regulation of glucocorticoid hormones, which mediate the phenotypic response to challenges, can therefore influence the ability to persist in a given environment. We compared stress responsiveness in four populations of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) breeding under different environmental conditions to evaluate support for different selective pressures in driving the evolution of glucocorticoid regulation. In accordance with the environmental unpredictability hypothesis, stronger stress responses were seen in more unpredictable environments. Contrary to the reproductive value hypothesis, the stress response was not lower in populations engaging in more valuable reproductive attempts. Populations with stronger stress responses also had stronger negative feedback, which supports a “mitigating” rather than a “magnifying” effect of negative feedback on stress responses. These results suggest that combining a robust stress response with strong negative feedback may be important for persisting in unpredictable or rapidly changing environments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
2 Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
3 Franklin and Marshall College, Department of Biology, Lancaster, USA (GRID:grid.256069.e)
4 University of Colorado, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)
5 The University of Tennessee Chattanooga, Biology, Geology and Environmental Science, Chattanooga, USA (GRID:grid.267303.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9338 1949)
6 Towson University, Department of Biological Sciences, Towson, USA (GRID:grid.265122.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0719 7561)