It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ecological communities often show changes in populations and their interactions over time. To date, however, it has been challenging to effectively untangle the mechanisms shaping such dynamics. One approach that has yet to be fully explored is to treat the varying structure of empirical communities—i.e. their network of interactions—as time series. Here, we follow this approach by applying a network-comparison technique to study the seasonal dynamics of plant-pollinator networks. We find that the structure of these networks is extremely variable, where species constantly change how they interact with each other within seasons. Most importantly, we find the holistic dynamic of plants and pollinators to be remarkably coherent across years, allowing us to reveal general rules by which species first enter, then change their roles, and finally leave the networks. Overall, our results disentangle key aspects of species’ interaction turnover, phenology, and seasonal assembly/disassembly processes in empirical plant-pollinator communities.
Plant-pollinator interactions are not fixed but instead can change seasonally and across years. Here, the authors provide a holistic perspective on how plants and pollinators first enter, then comprise, and ultimately leave interaction networks over time.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.21006.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 4063); ETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.21006.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 4063); University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438)
3 Chicago Botanic Garden, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.421134.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0664 5801); Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, USA (GRID:grid.294303.f)
4 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.21006.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 4063)




