It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Closely related muntjac deer show striking karyotype differences. Here we describe chromosome-scale genome assemblies for Chinese and Indian muntjacs, Muntiacus reevesi (2n = 46) and Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis (2n = 6/7), and analyze their evolution and architecture. The genomes show extensive collinearity with each other and with other deer and cattle. We identified numerous fusion events unique to and shared by muntjacs relative to the cervid ancestor, confirming many cytogenetic observations with genome sequence. One of these M. muntjak fusions reversed an earlier fission in the cervid lineage. Comparative Hi-C analysis showed that the chromosome fusions on the M. muntjak lineage altered long-range, three-dimensional chromosome organization relative to M. reevesi in interphase nuclei including A/B compartment structure. This reshaping of multi-megabase contacts occurred without notable change in local chromatin compaction, even near fusion sites. A few genes involved in chromosome maintenance show evidence for rapid evolution, possibly associated with the dramatic changes in karyotype.
Mudd et al. provide chromosome-scale genome assemblies for the Chinese and Indian muntjac deer and demonstrate evidence for rapid evolution of genes involved in chromosome maintenance. Their comparative analyses generate new insights into rapid karyotype evolution.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of California, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 University of California, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Innovative Genomics Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f)
3 University of California, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Innovative Genomics Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f); Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, USA (GRID:grid.451309.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0449 479X); Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Molecular Genetics Unit, Onna, Japan (GRID:grid.250464.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9805 2626)