1. Introduction
SO2 is the major air contaminant released in industrial activities. This gas is mainly generated from the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas), which is for power generation and the smelting of mineral ores, like copper, aluminum, zinc, lead, and iron [1]. SO2 produced by industry can cause acid rain, which contributes to air pollution, soil acidification, water pollution, and destruction of building structures [2]. These environmental problems affect human health, social security, and ecological harmony [3]. Thus, several efficient technologies have been employed for the removal of SO2 in industrial production by most countries [4].
Porous solid sorbents, such as activated carbon (AC), zeolites, alumina, and zirconia, attract much attention owing to their characteristics of cheap, low energy consumption, and easy regeneration [5,6]. In the area of air pollution control, porous solids have been widely adopted for desulfurization, because of their ultra-low sulfur contents and having high selectivity for sulfur compounds [7]. Specifically, AC is one of the main SO2 adsorbents, which have abundant oxygen- containing groups, highly porous structure, and good thermal stability [8,9,10]. The characteristics of abundant oxygen-containing groups and the highly porous structure of AC can enhance the performance for SO2 physisorption and provide more active sites for SO2 removal [11,12].
AC adsorbs SO2 until it reaches its saturation limit. On most occasions, the saturated AC fails to be reused, and is landfilled or incinerated [13]. The regeneration of saturated AC has become a desired feature from academic, industrial, and economic perspectives, as it complies with both the regulations of the discharge of solid pollutants and is good for constructing a sustainable society with a clean and tidy environment [13,14]. The methods of regenerating saturated materials mainly include thermal treatment, oxidation, microwave irradiation, and electrochemical methods [15]. Thermal treatment is the best compromised method in the regeneration of spent adsorbents in the consideration of the cost, the adsorption efficiency, and the number of regeneration cycles. The method is simple and versatile, and it can obtain better environmental and industrial benefits [14]. A versatile reaction mechanism is shown in Equations (1)–(3) in the process of SO2 adsorption and desorption by AC:
SO2 + O2 + H2O→H2SO4
AC + 2H2SO4→CO2 + 2SO2 + 2H2O
AC + H2SO4→CO + SO2 + H2O
Wang et al. [16] reported an increase in the SO2 removal efficiency of AC fibers after 1173 K thermal treatment. Saleh et al. [17] showed that the bimetallic nanoparticles which are loaded on the modified AC, can simultaneous remove SO2. Jiang et al. [18] revealed that activated carbon obtained from corncob waste showed an effective performance of removal of toluene from flue gas. Li et al. [19] demonstrated that the thermal regeneration of activated coke may cause carbon consumption, which is mostly influenced by the regeneration temperature. However, the performance of AC in the process of multiple recycle regeneration, has been rarely reported.
Thus, this study investigated the influence of various experimental conditions on SO2 adsorption, and focused both on the investigation of the influence of thermal regeneration on the characteristics of AC, and the adsorption efficiency and mechanism of AC after thermal regeneration [1,2].
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials AC was supplied by Xinhua Chemical Ltd., China. SO2 was provided by Shanghai Chunyu Special Gas Co., Ltd. Before the experiment, AC was ground and sieved to 20–40 mesh. Then, AC was dried at 120 °C for 24 h, labeled as AC and stored in a desiccator. 2.2. SO2 Adsorption Experiment
The experimental device is shown in Figure 1. A single factor experiment was used to investigate the effects of activated carbon dosage, oxygen content, and flue gas flow rate on activated carbon adsorption, as shown in Table 1. A certain amount of adsorbents were placed in a 15 × 150 mm U- shaped tube and heated in a water bath at 60 °C, under a mixed gas flow (the consistent mixed gas contained 2000 ppm SO2, a certain amount of O2, and was balanced by N2. The amount of SO2 in the exhaust gas was analyzed by a portable flue gas analyzer (KANE9506, England KANE). The desulfurization efficiency of the adsorbent AC calculated, which determined the suitable adsorption conditions. The desulfurization efficiency can be evaluated by:
η=Ci −Co×100%Ci
where η is the desulfurization efficiency, Ci represents the SO2 inlet concentration, and Co the SO2 outlet concentration (ppm).
2.3. Recycle of AC
Saturated AC was placed in a quartz boat and heated in a tube furnace at 420 °C for 1.5 h, under a gas flow rate of 1.65 L/min. The AC was weighed after cooling to room temperature. After that, the regenerated adsorbent was treated to remove SO2 cyclically under the suitable experimental conditions, while the cycles were carried out ten times. The regenerated samples were marked as Reg-ACn, where n represents the number of cycles. After each regeneration, the weights of the adsorbent were recorded, and the regeneration loss and sulfur capacity calculated. The samples were characterized by several methods, and the desulfurization efficiency and adsorption capacity obtained. The adsorption capacity can be calculated as follows:
qm =F/m(Cit−∫0tCodt)
where qm is the adsorption capacity of SO2 (mg/g); F is the flue gas rate (L/min); Ci represents the SO2 inlet concentration, and Co the SO2 outlet concentration (ppm); m is the weight of AC (g); t is the time of removal of SO2 (min).
2.4. Characterization of AC The SEM images of AC were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM–6460, Japan JEOL). The textural characteristics of the AC samples were analyzed by adsorption–desorption of nitrogen at 77 K on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 auto-adsorption system (Norcross, GA, USA). 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Characterization of AC
3.1.1. SEM Analysis
The SEM images of the six AC samples after five times regeneration are shown in Figure 2a–f. From the aspects of pore structure, the surface of the samples appeared to have a structure with more micropores and mesoporous (Figure 2b) after thermal regeneration. Additionally, some micropore structures were observed within the macropores as in Figure 2e,f. After the 8th cycle, the pores were irregularly arranged and partly collapsed. Comparing the surface morphology of the AC before and after desulfurization, some white particles with irregular shape were deposited on the surface of the samples after regeneration, which could have been sulfate. Some of the micropores became clogged with these particles. The results indicated that new micropores are generated after regeneration, which is conducive to the adsorption of SO2 by AC, while the deposition of sulfate lead to a decline in desulfurization activity with continued cycles of regeneration.
3.1.2. BET Analysis
As shown in Table 2, the micropore area accounts for approximately 3/4 of the total area, which suggests that the samples mainly contained micropores. The micropore area, surface area, and pore volumes were slightly increased after thermal regeneration, owing to the continual etching of the formed micropores [20]. This case favored the improvement of the storage capacity for H2SO4 and the desulfurization efficiency of AC.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore size distribution of all samples are depicted in Figure 3. In Figure 3a, the presence of micropores was proved owing to the dramatic increase of the adsorbed volume, when the adsorbents are at low relative pressure (P/P0 < 0.2) [21,22]. According to IUPAC classification [23], the adsorption–desorption isotherms of all samples comply with typical I- type isotherms of microporous solids. A narrow and long hysteresis ring appeared in the curve at relative high pressure, and which ended at P/P0 = 1. This indicates that the samples contained both micropores and mesopores. In Figure 3b, the broadening of pore size distribution of AC after thermal regeneration was shown from the distribution of the pore size obtained by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods [20,24], which provides evidence for a slight increase of the surface area and pore volumes. Many studies suggested that the adsorption capacity is mainly affected by the micropore structure. Diez et al. reported that the main thrust in the promotion of SO2 oxidation is that micropores and mesopores exist simultaneously in the solid adsorbent [25].
3.2. SO2 Adsorption
3.2.1. Effect of AC Dosage on SO2 Adsorption
As seen in Figure 4, at amounts of 2 g, 4 g, 6 g, 8 g, and 10 g, the average SO2 adsorption rates of AC in ten minutes were 42.3%, 55.8%, 62.3%, 68.5%, and 79.7%, respectively. The desulfurization efficiency is improved by the increase of the AC amount. This indicates that the SO2 saturation adsorption capacity of the samples is highly influenced by the amount of AC. On increase of dosage, more active surface areas and sites are provided from the AC, which develops the removal capacity of SO2 [26]. The best option combines both the cost and desulfurization efficiency, so we fixed the AC dosage for the rest of the experiment at an amount of 4 g.
3.2.2. Effect of Flue Gas Flow Rate on SO2 Adsorption
The influence of gas flow rate on adsorption performance was studied by analysis of the desulfurization efficiency at flow rates of 1, 2, 3, and 4 L/min. As seen in Figure 5, the average SO2 adsorption rates of AC at the gas flow rate of 1 L/min, 2 L/min, 3 L/min and 4 L/min were 86.2%, 75.9%, 62.3%, and 57.4% in ten minutes, respectively. The slower the gas flow rate, the higher is the adsorption efficiency. It is evident that the faster the gas flow rate, the lower the retention time of the SO2 in the AC of the U-shaped tube, thus the adsorption efficiency decreases. In addition, as the gas flow rate decreases, the adsorption efficiency gradually becomes improved. The reason for this phenomenon is that the lower the flue gas rate, the bigger is the resistance [27]. So for the other experiments, the flue gas flow rate is selected at a slow flow rate of 1.65 L/min as a fixed condition.
3.2.3. Effect of Oxygen Content on SO2 Adsorption
To investigate the influence of O2 contents on the SO2 adsorption efficiency, experiments were carried out under conditions of different O2 content (0, 2.5, 5, and 7.5% O2). Below 5%, it was observed from Figure 6 that with the increase in O2 content, the desulfurization efficiency increases. It indicated that the present of O2 could improve the desulfurization efficiency. This can be explained as follows: if oxygen and water vapor exist in the process of SO2 adsorption, SO2 will be oxidized to sulfuric acid and introduced into the pores of the AC, which improves the desulfurization efficiency of AC [28]. When the pore widths in the range of microporous to mesoporous increase, the capacity for storing gas and liquid may be improved [20]. The desulfurization efficiency above 5% was less. It could be shown that a large number of oxides were produced due to the combination of too much O2 with the active components on the AC surface, thereby the AC fails to combine with more active sites, thereby its desulfurization efficiency decreases [29]. Therefore, we selected a fixed condition of oxygen content of 5% for the rest of the experiments.
3.3. AC Regeneration
The SO2 breakthrough curves after ten adsorption desorption cycles are illustrated in Figure 7. Under suitable adsorption conditions (4 g AC, 1.65 L/min flow gas, and 5% O2), the average desulfurization rate of fresh AC over the first ten minutes is about 96%, and the highest desulfurization rate of all the samples achieves more than 90%. The desulfurization efficiency decreased gradually after multiple regenerations. First, one of the reasons maybe that the micropores became disrupted after thermal treatment. This problem can be minimized in mesoporous carbon materials, such as porous carbon nanofibers, owing to their thermal and mechanical stability [30]. Second, the surface of AC produced some sulfates or oxygen groups in the regeneration [31,32], a part of the micropores of AC was blocked after this situation. In addition, a certain amount of carbon loss may occur during the process of thermal treatment. Despite this, the highest desulfurization efficiency of 95.4% was still achieved at the tenth cycle.
As shown in Figure 8, the sulfur capacity of fresh AC is 38.88 mg/g. After the first heating regeneration at 400 °C, the decrease in sulfur capacity is most obvious. Though the SO2 capacity of AC decreases continuously with multiple cycles, the regenerated AC after 10 cycles showed a sulfur capacity of 23.44 mg/g for SO2 adsorption, which only decreased by 15.44 mg/g compared to that of fresh AC, while after the seventh time, the rate of sulfur capacity decrease became slower. Zhang et al. [15] showed that the adsorption capacity of CuFe2O4/AC magnetic adsorbent is high, but the adsorption capacity of CuFe2O4/AC decreases significantly after regeneration. According to Xu et al. [33] biochar made from cow manure, sewage sludge, and rice husks showed an SO2 adsorption capacity of up to 64 mg g−1, but its specific surface area was too low (the maximum was 42 m2 g−1). In comparison, the adsorption capacity of commercial AC in the regeneration process did not significantly decrease. The reason is that in the process of sulfuric acid etching, the pore widths in the range of microporous to mesoporous increased, which improved the capacity for storing sulfuric acid, and new micropores were produced in the process of sulfuric acid etching. Those conditions are good for the recovery of the porous volume and adsorption capacity of AC after the cycles of regeneration.
4. Conclusions The effect of SO2 adsorption efficiency was experimentally studied with different carbon dosages, flue gas flow rates, and oxygen contents. Then, the characterization and desulfurization efficiency of AC was observed under the current optimum adsorption conditions for a number of 10 heated regeneration cycles. During the thermal regenerations, micropores became disrupted, and some of them became blocked by sulfate particles on the AC surface. However, owing to sulfuric acid etching, the pore widths in the range of microporous to mesoporous increased and some new micropores were produced. Therefore, the specific surface area and pore volume of AC were slightly increased. The highest desulfurization efficiency of fresh AC was 98.7%. The highest desulfurization efficiency was 95.4% after ten cycles. The results show that AC has a high SO2 adsorption efficiency and the performance of desulfurization is only slightly decreased after ten thermal regeneration cycles, so it can be concluded that AC is a suitable material for multiple adsorption–desulfurization cycles.
Figure 2. SEM image of the prepared activated carbon (AC) treated with regeneration after 0 (a), 2 (b), 4 (c), 6 (d), 8 (e), 10 (f) number of cycles.
Figure 3. The N2 sorption isotherms (a) and pore size distributions (b) of the samples (where AC. stands for fresh AC, Reg-ACn stands for the nth regenerated AC).
Figure 4. Effect of change of carbon dosage on SO2 adsorption behavior (operated at 60 °C, for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 g samples, 2000 ppm SO2, 5% O2, N2 to balance and 1.65 L/min total flow rate).
Figure 5. Effect of flue gas flow rate on SO2 adsorption (operated at 60 °C, 4 g sample, 2000 ppm SO2, 5% O2, N2 to balance and 1, 2, 3, 4 L/min total flow rate).
Figure 6. Effect of change in oxygen content on SO2 adsorption behavior (operated at 60 °C, 4 g sample, 2000 ppm SO2, N2 to balance, and 1 L/min total flow rate).
Figure 7. SO2 desulfurization efficiency of the regenerated adsorbents, where 0-10 stands for number of cycles.
Figure 8. Sulfur capacity of the regenerated adsorbents, where 0-10 stands for number of cycles.
AC Dosage/g | Flue Gas Rate/L·min−1 | Oxygen Content/% |
---|---|---|
2 | 1.65 | 5 |
4 | 1.65 | 5 |
6 | 1.65 | 5 |
8 | 1.65 | 5 |
10 | 1.65 | 5 |
4 | 1 | 5 |
4 | 2 | 5 |
4 | 3 | 5 |
4 | 4 | 5 |
4 | 1.65 | 0 |
4 | 1.65 | 2.5 |
4 | 1.65 | 5 |
4 | 1.65 | 7.5 |
Cycles | Micropore Area(m2/g) | BET Surface(m2/g) | Total Pore Volume(cm3/g) | Average Pore Size(nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 356.449 | 463.601 | 0.246 | 2.594 |
2 | 387.726 | 498.530 | 0.273 | 3.074 |
4 | 395.423 | 518.272 | 0.291 | 3.299 |
6 | 435.656 | 563.622 | 0.321 | 3.229 |
8 | 463.761 | 589.350 | 0.319 | 5.027 |
10 | 443.978 | 664.601 | 0.373 | 2.793 |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.S.; methodology, M.W.; validation, Z.S.; investigation, J.F. and Y.Z.; resources, Z.S.; writing-original draft preparation, M.W.; writing-review and editing, Z.S. and L.Z.; project administration, Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21806101), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No.16ZR1412600), Research Center of Resource Recycling Science and Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University and Gaoyuan Discipline of Shanghai-Environmental Science and Engineering (Resource Recycling Science and Engineering), Cultivate discipline fund of Shanghai Polytechnic University (No.XXKPY1601).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1. Braghiroli, F.L.; Bouafif, H.; Koubaa, A. Enhanced SO2 adsorption and desorption on chemically and physically activated biochar made from wood residues. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 138, 111456.
2. Rosas, J.M.; Ramiro, R.R.; José, R.M.; Tomás, C. Kinetic study of SO2 removal over lignin-based activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 707-721.
3. Khaniabadi, Y.O.; Daryanoosh, S.M.; Hopke, P.K.; Ferrante, M.; De Marco, A.; Sicard, P.; Oliveri Conti, G.; Goudarzi, G.; Basiri, H.; Mohammadi, M.J.; et al. Acute myocardial infarction and COPD attributed to ambient SO2 in Iran. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 683-687.
4. Zhao, Y.Q.; Dou, J.X.; Duan, X.X.; Chai, H.N.; Oliveira, J.S.; Yu, J.L. Adverse effects of inherent CaO in coconut shell-derived activated carbon on its performance during flue gas desulfurization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 1973-1981.
5. Martinez, I.; Santos, V.E.; Alcon, A.; Garcia, O.F. Enhancement of the biodesulfurization capacity of pseudomonas putida CECT5279 by co-substrate addition. Process Biochem. Chem. 2015, 50, 119-124.
6. Tawfik, A.S.; Gaddafi, I.D. Influence of acidic and basic treatments of activated carbon derived from waste rubber tires on adsorptive desulfurization of thiophenes. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 60, 460-468.
7. Shi, R.H.; Zhang, Z.R.; Zhen, T.; Shang, G.J.; Mi, J. Cu-based metal-organic framework/activated carbon composites for sulfur compounds removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 394, 394-402.
8. Jia, F.R.; Li, Z.; Wang, E.G.; He, J.C.; Dong, H.; Liu, G.X.; Jian, W.W. Preparation and SO2 adsorption behavior of coconut shell-based activated carbon via microwave-assisted oxidant activation. China Pet. Process PE 2018, 20, 67-74.
9. Rezaei, F.; Rownaghi, A.A.; Monjezi, S. SOx/NOx removal from flue gas streams by solid adsorbents: A review of current challenges and future directions. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 5467-5486.
10. Li, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.S.; Wang, H.H.; Tsai, C.J.; Yang, X.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, C.Z.; Xiao, P.N.; Webley, P.A. A numerical modelling study of SO2 adsorption on activated carbons with new rate equations. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 858-866.
11. Spessato, L.; Bedin, K.C.; Cazetta, A.L.; Souza, I.P.; Duarte, V.A.; Crespo, L.H.; Silva, M.C.; Pontes, R.M.; Almeida, V.C. KOH-super activated carbon from biomass waste: Insights into the paracetamol adsorption mechanism and thermal regeneration cycles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 499-505.
12. Li, S.; Han, K.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Lu, C. Preparation and Characterization of super activated carbon produced from gulfweed by KOH activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 243, 291-300.
13. Marques, S.C.; Marcuzzo, J.M.; Baldan, M.R.; Mestre, A.S.; Carvalho, A.P. Pharmaceuticals removal by activated carbons: Role of morphology on cyclic thermal regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 321, 233-244.
14. Yang, C.; Florent, M.; Falco, G.D.; Fan, H.L.; Bandosz, T.J. ZnFe2O4/activated carbon as a regenerable adsorbent for catalytic removal of H2S from air at room temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124906.
15. Do, M.H.; Phan, N.H.; Nguyen, T.D.; Pham, T.S.; Nguyen, V.K.; Trangvu, T.T.; Nguyen, T.K.P. Activated carbon/Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite: Fabrication, methyl orange removal and regeneration by hydrogen peroxide. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 1269-1276.
16. Wang, Z.; Jin, H.; Wang, K.; Xie, Y.H.; Ning, J.; Tu, Y.J.; Chen, Y.M.; Liu, H.; Zeng, H.Z. A two-step method for the integrated removal of HCl, SO2 and NO at low temperature using viscose-based activated carbon fibers modified by nitric acid. Fuel 2019, 239, 272-281.
17. Saleh, T.A. Simultaneous adsorptive desulfurization of diesel fuel over bimetallic nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 172, 2123-2132.
18. Zhu, J.; Li, Y.H.; Xu, L.; Liu, Z.Y. Removal of toluene from waste gas by adsorption-desorption process using corncob-based activated carbons as adsorbents. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 165, 115-125.
19. Li, Y.R.; Lin, Y.T.; Wang, B.; Ding, S.; Qi, F.; Zhu, T.Y. Carbon consumption of activated coke in the thermal regeneration process for flue gas desulfurization and denitrification. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1391-1400.
20. Gadipelli, S.; Howard, C.A.; Guo, J.; Skipper, N.T.; Zhang, H.; Shearing, P.R.; Brett, D.L. Superior Multifunctional Activity of Nanoporous Carbons with Widely Tunable Porosity: Enhanced Storage Capacities for Carbon-Dioxide, Hydrogen, Water, and Electric Charge. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903649.
21. Hu, L. Monolithic bamboo-based activated carbons for dynamic adsorption of toluene. J. Porous Mater. 2016, 24, 541-549.
22. Sui, H. Removal and recovery of oxylene by silica gel using vacuum swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 316, 232-242.
23. IUPAC Recommendations. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603-619.
24. Srinivas, G.; Krungleviciute, V.; Guo, Z.X.; Yildirim, T. Exceptional CO2 capture in a hierarchically porous carbon with simultaneous high surface area and pore volume. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 335-342.
25. Diez, N.; Alvarez, P.; Granda, M.; Blanco, C.; Gryglewicz, G.; Wróbel-Iwaniec, I.; Sliwak, A.; Machnikowski, J.; Menendez, R. Tailoring micro-mesoporosity in activated carbon fibers to enhance SO2 catalytic oxidation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 428, 36-40.
26. Hernández-Maldonado, A.J.; Yang, R.T. Desulfurization of transportation fuels by adsorption. Catal. Rev. 2004, 46, 111-150.
27. Nahma, S.W.; Shim, W.G.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, S.C. Thermal and chemical regeneration of spent activated carbon and its adsorption property for toluene. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 210, 500-509.
28. Li, B.; Ma, C.Y. Study on the mechanism of SO2 removal by activated carbon. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 471-477.
29. Ye, L.; Ping, N.; Kai, L. Simultaneous Removal of NOx and SO2 by Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction over modified activated carbon catalysts. Chem. Kinet. Catal. 2017, 91, 490-499.
30. Wang, X.; Song, Y.H. Mesoporous carbons: Recent advances in synthesis and typical applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 83239-83285.
31. Pi, X.; Sun, F.; Gao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Qu, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhao, G. Microwave irradiation induced high-efficiency regeneration for desulfurized activated coke: A comparative study with conventional thermal regeneration. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 9693-9702.
32. Li, Q.Y.; Hou, Y.Q.; Han, X.J.; Wang, J.C.; Liu, Y.J.; Xiang, N.; Huang, Z.J. Promotional effect of cyclic desulfurization and regeneration for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119392.
33. Xu, X.; Huang, D.; Zhao, L.; Kan, Y.; Cao, X. Role of inherent inorganic constituents in SO2 sorption ability of biochars derived from three biomass wastes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 12957-12965.
Zhiguo Sun*, Menglu Wang, Jiaming Fan, Yue Zhou and Li Zhang*
School of Environmental and Materials Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209, China
*Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This study explored the regenerated performance of activated carbon (AC) as SO2 adsorbent. The optimal conditions of SO2 removal were determined by experiment, and then the adsorption efficiency of AC was studied by a method of thermal regeneration. The characteristics of regenerated AC were analyzed by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) methods. The test results showed that the most suitable adsorption conditions were using 4 g of activated carbon, 1.65 L/min gas flue rate, and 5% O2. During the ten regenerations, the desulfurization efficiency and sulfur capacity of AC still maintained a high level. The characterization results showed that the increase of material surface area and pore volume were 101 m2 g−1, and 0.13 cm3 g−1, respectively, after the cycles.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer