It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mathematical models can enable a predictive understanding of mechanism in cell biology by quantitatively describing complex networks of interactions, but such models are often poorly constrained by available data. Owing to its relative biochemical simplicity, the core circadian oscillator in Synechococcus elongatus has become a prototypical system for studying how collective dynamics emerge from molecular interactions. The oscillator consists of only three proteins, KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC, and near‐24‐h cycles of KaiC phosphorylation can be reconstituted in vitro. Here, we formulate a molecularly detailed but mechanistically naive model of the KaiA—KaiC subsystem and fit it directly to experimental data within a Bayesian parameter estimation framework. Analysis of the fits consistently reveals an ultrasensitive response for KaiC phosphorylation as a function of KaiA concentration, which we confirm experimentally. This ultrasensitivity primarily results from the differential affinity of KaiA for competing nucleotide‐bound states of KaiC. We argue that the ultrasensitive stimulus–response relation likely plays an important role in metabolic compensation by suppressing premature phosphorylation at nighttime.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Lavrentovich, Danylo O 2
; Chavan, Archana 3 ; Leypunskiy, Eugene 1
; Li, Eileen 4 ; Matthews, Charles 4 ; LiWang, Andy 5
; Rust, Michael J 6 ; Dinner, Aaron R 7
1 Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
3 School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
4 Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
5 School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA; Quantitative and Systems Biology, University of California, Merced, CA, USA; Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of California, Merced, CA, USA; Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California, Merced, CA, USA; Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Machines, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
6 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
7 Department of Chemistry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA




