Abstract

Olfactory impairment affects ~ 20% of the population and has been linked to various serious disorders. Microbes in the nasal cavity play a key role in priming the physiology of the olfactory epithelium and maintaining a normal sense of smell by the host. The aim of this study was to explore the link between olfactory dysfunction and nasal bacterial communities. A total of 162 subjects were recruited for this study from a specialized olfactory dysfunction clinic and placed into one of three groups: anosmia, hyposmia or normosmia. Swabs from the nasal middle meatus were collected from each subject then processed for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. No overall differences in bacterial diversity or composition were observed between the three cohorts in this study. However, the relative abundances of Corynebacterium spp. and Streptococcus spp. were significantly (p < 0.05) different in subjects with olfactory loss. Furthermore, subjects with deficiencies in discriminating between smells (based on discrimination scores) had a lower bacterial diversity (Simpson’s evenness p < 0.05). While these results are preliminary in nature, potential bacterial biomarkers for olfactory loss were identified. These findings need to be further validated and biologically tested in animal models.

Details

Title
Loss of bacterial diversity in the sinuses is associated with lower smell discrimination scores
Author
Biswas, Kristi 1 ; Wagner Mackenzie Brett 1 ; Ballauf Charlotte 2 ; Draf Julia 2 ; Douglas, Richard G 1 ; Hummel, Thomas 2 

 University of Auckland, Department of Surgery, Auckland, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343) 
 Technische Universität Dresden, Smell and Taste Clinic, ENT Department, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.4488.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 7257) 
Publication year
2020
Publication date
2020
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2449452879
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.