It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Assessing features of centralized pain may prove to be clinically meaningful in pediatric populations. However, we are currently limited by the lack of validated pediatric measures.
AimWe examined the psychometric properties of the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity (SS) scale to assess features of centralized pain in youth with painful conditions from three clinical samples: (1) musculoskeletal surgery, (2) headache, and (3) chronic pain.
MethodsParticipants were 240 youth aged 10 to 18 years (Mage = 14.8, SD = 1.9) who completed the WPI and SS scale. Subsets of participants also completed additional measures of pain region, pain intensity, quality of life, pain interference, and physical function.
ResultsIncreased features of centralized pain by age were seen for the WPI (r = 0.27, P < 0.01) and SS scale (r = 0.29, P < 0.01). Expected differences in sex were seen for the WPI (sex: t132 = −3.62, P < 0.01) but not the SS scale (sex: t223 = −1.73, P = 0.09). Reliability for the SS scale was adequate (α = 0.70). Construct validity was demonstrated through relationships between the WPI and pain regions (r = 0.57, P < 0.01) and between the SS scale and quality of life (r = −0.59, P < 0.01) and pain interference (r = 0.56, P < 0.01). Criterion validity was demonstrated by differences on the WPI between the surgery sample and the headache and chronic pain samples (F2,237 = 17.55, P < 0.001). Comprehension of the SS scale items was problematic for some youth.
ConclusionsThe WPI showed adequate psychometric properties in youth; however, the SS scale may need to be modified. Our findings support the need to develop psychometrically sound instruments for comprehensive assessment of pain in pediatric samples.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2 Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
3 Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
4 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA