It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The spectacular royal tomb “Ulaankhermiin Shoroon Bumbagar” was discovered in Bulgan province, Mongolia, in 2011. Excavation of the site revealed its internal structure; a slope of 42 meters in length leading down to the underground mausoleum at a depth of 7 m below the ground. Archaeological investigations provided the site with an independent age control suggesting the construction date of the Royal tomb to the last quarter of the VII century.
In this study, we directly date different materials from the site, such as terracotta figurines, mortar and host sediment, using infrared-stimulated (IR50) and postinfrared infrared stimulated (pIRIR) luminescence techniques. The most accurate estimate of 670 ± 70AD and 550 ± 110AD was obtained for terracotta figurines using IR50 and pIRIR on aliquots of 4–11 µm polymineral grains. By comparison, sand-sized quartz single grain measurements on the embedded sediment yielded normal equivalent dose (De) distributions with a few outliers, justifying the use of the central age model (CAM) for age calculation, and yielded construction dating to the 780 ± 140AD. Finally, sand-sized quartz single grain measurements on wall mortar revealed incomplete bleaching of grains, requiring detailed analysis using statistical approaches; from this we identified the most well bleached population age of 740 ± 130AD, using the lowest 5%. The luminescence ages are in general agreement with the historically expected age.
Statement of significance The archaeological site at Ulaankhermiin Shoroon Bumbagar, Mongolia (with an independent age control) offers a great opportunity to apply luminescence dating methods, such as pIRIR on 4–11 µm polymineral fine grains, and single grain measurements on 200–250 µm quartz grains, to various materials, such as terracotta figurines, mortar-like limestone which covered the walls and embedded sediment in order to test the accuracy of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating techniques. Compared to all other datable archaeological materials, mortar has the advantage of being intentionally manufactured at each stage of construction, since it cannot be recycled. However, dating of the well bleached grains of mortar, which provided the greatest challenge in this study, was achieved using the lowest 5% estimate, yielding an age of 740 ± 130AD. pIRIR on heated polymineral (feldspar-bearing) fine grain aliquots from terracotta figurines was tested, yielding IR50 and pIRIR180 dates in agreement with the CAM estimate from the host sediment.
Cite this article Solongo, S., Ochir, A., Tengis, S., Fitzsimmons, K., and Hublin, J.-J. Luminescence dating of mortar and terracotta from a Royal Tomb at Ulaankhermiin Shoroon Bumbagar, Mongolia. STAR 2015; 1(2), STAR2015122054892315Y.0000000004
Data availability The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are contained within the paper.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; Department for Human evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
2 International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
3 Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
4 Department for Human evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany