It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ecosystem evapotranspiration (ET) has been quantified around the world by different methodologies to understand the energy balance, especially to control the evolution of climate change. It is known that the vegetation of the pampa biome is natural grasslands, it has a large variety of species (flora and fauna), however is it different in the environmental aspects related to the energy balance when compared to the grassland cultivated? In this study the objective was to analyze the environmental differences of the Pampa Biome related to the energy balance in comparison with the pastures cultivated in Barrax, Spain. In the first one the minimum daily ET is 0.99 mm/day, while in the second is 1.57 mm/day. However, the highest differences between the sites occur during the summer period, in the maximum daily ET, the maximum is 16.25 mm/day in Pampa and in Barrax is 7.31 mm/day. The results of this study have indicated that the characteristics of the Pampa biome, both in terms of soil and climatic issues and land use, generate differences in the energy balance when compared to similar vegetation in other regions of the world.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul), Laboratório de Sensoriamento Geológico (LabSRGeo), Postgraduate in Remote Sensing, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil; UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul), Laboratório de Sensoriamento Geológico (LabSRGeo), Postgraduate in Remote Sensing, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
2 UV (University of Valencia), Unidad de Cambio Global (UCG), Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Valencia, Spain; UV (University of Valencia), Unidad de Cambio Global (UCG), Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Valencia, Spain
3 UNIPAMPA (Federal University of Pampa), Laboratorio Interdisciplinar de Ciências Ambientais (LICA), São Gabriel (RS), Brazil; UNIPAMPA (Federal University of Pampa), Laboratorio Interdisciplinar de Ciências Ambientais (LICA), São Gabriel (RS), Brazil
4 Institute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; Institute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
5 UFSM (Federal University of Santa Maria), Department of Physics, Santa Maria (RS), Brazil; UFSM (Federal University of Santa Maria), Department of Physics, Santa Maria (RS), Brazil