Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

This study investigates the chemical composition of PM2.5 collected at a central location in Beijing, China, during winter 2016 and summer 2017. The samples were characterised using direct-infusion negative-nano-electrospray-ionisation ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry to elucidate the composition and the potential primary and secondary sources of the organic fraction. The samples from the two seasons were compared with those from a road-tunnel site and an urban background site in Birmingham, UK, analysed in the course of an earlier study using the same method. There were strong differences in aerosol particle composition between the seasons, particularly regarding (poly-)aromatic compounds, which were strongly enhanced in winter, likely due to increased fossil fuel and biomass burning for heating. In addition to the seasonal differences, compositional differences between high- and low-pollution conditions were observed, with the contribution of sulfur-containing organic compounds strongly enhanced under high-pollution conditions. There was a correlation of the number of sulfur-containing molecular formulae with the concentration of particulate sulfate, consistent with a particle-phase formation process.

Details

Title
Differences in the composition of organic aerosols between winter and summer in Beijing: a study by direct-infusion ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry
Author
Steimer, Sarah S 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Patton, Daniel J 2 ; Vu, Tuan V 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Panagi, Marios 4 ; Monks, Paul S 5 ; Harrison, Roy M 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fleming, Zoë L 7   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Shi, Zongbo 3 ; Kalberer, Markus 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; now at: Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 
 Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK 
 Division of Environmental Health and Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B1 52TT, UK 
 National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Earth Observation Science Group, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK 
 Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK 
 Division of Environmental Health and Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B1 52TT, UK; Department of Environmental Sciences/Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 
 National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; now at: Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Departamento de Geofísica, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 
 Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland 
Pages
13303-13318
Publication year
2020
Publication date
2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
ISSN
16807316
e-ISSN
16807324
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2458971039
Copyright
© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.