It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite the frequency and adverse effects of conflict, randomized controlled studies on interventions that could promote conflict resolution (e.g., among romantic couples) are scarce. One understudied intervention technique is mediation, which is a negotiation facilitated by a neutral third party. To test the impact of a mediator on couple conflict, we conducted a randomized controlled study involving 38 romantic couples who discussed a topic of recurrent disagreement either in the presence of a mediator or by means of a direct negotiation. The results show that romantic couples in the mediation condition, compared with those in direct negotiation, had a probability of reaching an agreement 1.39 times higher and reported higher satisfaction regarding the content and process of their discussions. In addition, the synchronicity of the couple’s skin conductance, a measure of arousal, correlated with the couple’s closeness and with the quality of their relationship. Our findings suggest that interventions based on mediation can have a beneficial impact on conflict resolution.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Geneva, Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); University of Geneva, Battelle Campus, Computer Vision and Multimedia Laboratory, Carouge, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); Melbourne Business School, Carlton, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
2 University of Geneva, Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); University of Geneva, Battelle Campus, Computer Vision and Multimedia Laboratory, Carouge, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988)
3 University of Geneva, Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); University of Geneva, Laboratory for the Study of Emotion Elicitation and Expression, Department of Psychology, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); University of Geneva, Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988); Technische Universität Dresden, Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.4488.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 7257)